González López, ArtemioTanaka, Toshiaki2023-06-202023-06-202006-04-07[1] C. M. Bender and S. Boettcher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 5243. physics/9712001. [2] K. C. Shin, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 38 (2005) 6147. math.SP/0407018. [3] U. Günther, F. Stefani, and M. Znojil, J. Math. Phys. 46 (2005) 063504. math-ph/0501069. [4] P. K. Ghosh, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 38 (2005) 7313. quant-ph/0501087. [5] T. D. Tai, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 38 (2005) 3665. math-ph/0502009. [6] B. Bagchi, C. Quesne, and R. Roychoudhury, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 38 (2005) L647. quantph/0508073. [7] C. M. Bender, H. F. Jones, and R. J. Rivers, Phys. Lett. B 625 (2005) 333. hep-th/0508105. [8] A. Mostafazadeh, J. Math. Phys. 43 (2002) 205. math-ph/0107001. [9] A. Sinha and P. Roy, J. Math. Phys. 46 (2005) 032102. quant- ph/0505221. [10] A. A. Andrianov and A. V. Sokolov, Nucl. Phys. B 660 (2003) 25. hep- th/0301062. [11] A. Mostafazadeh, J. Math. Phys. 43 (2002) 2814. math-ph/0110016. [12] A. Mostafazadeh, J. Math. Phys. 43 (2002) 3944. math-ph/0203005. [13] A. Mostafazadeh, Nucl. Phys. B 640 (2002) 419. math-ph/0203041. [14] A. Mostafazadeh, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 17 (2002) 1973. math- ph/0204013. [15] A. Mostafazadeh, J. Math. Phys. 43 (2002) 6343. Erratum-ibid. 44 (2003) 943, mathph/0207009. [16] A. Mostafazadeh, J. Math. Phys. 44 (2003) 974. math-ph/0209018. [17] A. Mostafazadeh, J. Math. Phys. 45 (2004) 932. math-ph/0302050. [18] H. Aoyama, M. Sato, and T. Tanaka, Nucl. Phys. B 619 (2001) 105. quant-ph/0106037. [19] A. González-López and T. Tanaka, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 38 (2005) 5133. hep-th/0405079. [20] H. Aoyama, N. Nakayama, M. Sato, and T. Tanaka, Phys. Lett. B 519 (2001) 260. hepth/0107048. [21] T. Tanaka, Nucl. Phys. B 662 (2003) 413. hep-th/0212276. [22] A. V. Turbiner, Commun. Math. Phys. 118 (1988) 467. [23] V. G. Bagrov and B. F. Samsonov, Phys. Part. Nucl. 28 (1997) 374. [24] B. F. Samsonov, Phys. Lett. A 263 (1999) 274. quant-ph/9904009. [25] D. J. Fernández C., J. Negro, and L. M. Nieto, Phys. Lett. A 275 (2000) 338. [26] D. J. Fernández C., B. Mielnik, O. Rosas-Ortiz, and B. F. Samsonov, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 35 (2002) 4279. quant-ph/0303051. [27] D. J. Fernández C., R. Muñoz, and A. Ramos, Phys. Lett. A 308 (2003) 11. quant-ph/0212026. [28] T. Tanaka, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 39 (2006) 219. quant-ph/0509132. [29] O. von Roos, Phys. Rev. B 27 (1983) 7547. [30] A. Mostafazadeh, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 38 (2005) 3213. quant-ph/0410012. [30] A. Mostafazadeh, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 38 (2005) 3213. quant-ph/0410012.0305-447010.1088/0305-4470/39/14/014https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/51544©IOP Publishing. This work was partially supported by Spain’s DGI under the grant No. BFM2002-02646 (AG-L) as well as by the National Science Council of the Republic of China under the grant No. NSC-93-2112-M-032-009 (TT).We recall the importance of recognizing the different mathematical nature of various concepts relating to PT -symmetric quantum theories. After clarifying the relation between supersymmetry and pseudo-supersymmetry, we prove generically that nonlinear pseudo-supersymmetry, recently proposed by Sinha and Roy, is just a special case of N -fold supersymmetry. In particular, we show that all the models constructed by these authors have type A 2-fold supersymmetry. Furthermore, we prove that an arbitrary one-body quantum Hamiltonian which admits two (local) solutions in closed form belongs to type A 2-fold supersymmetry, irrespective of whether or not it is Hermitian, PT -symmetric, pseudo-Hermitian, and so on.engjournal articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/39/14/014http://iopscience.iop.orghttp://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0602177open access51-73Non-hermitian hamiltoniansQuantum-mechanicsPt-symmetryPeriodic potentialsReal spectraSystemsTransformationsFísica-Modelos matemáticosFísica matemática