Del Río Carrillo, Regina MaríaMolinero-Mourelle, PedroVera, VicenteRomero Villaba, PabloCasañas, ElizabethManrique FonsecaVera González, VicenteMourelle Martínez, Rosa2023-07-182023-07-182021Del Río Carrillo, R.M.; Molinero-Mourelle, P.; Vera, V.; Romero Villaba, P.; Casañas, E.; Fonseca, M.; Vera-Gonzalez, V.; Mourelle-Martinez, M.R. Micro Push-Out Bond Strength of Resin Composite to Dentin in Primary Dentition Using Three Universal Adhesives with Different pH: An In Vitro Study. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 6349. https://doi.org/10.3390/app111463492076-341710.3390/app11146349https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/87272To evaluate the bond strength of different universal adhesives on deciduous tooth dentineand their relationship with the composition and potential of hydrogen (pH). Methods: An in vitromicro push-out test on 150 samples (n = 50) per group per adhesive, namely, Adhese Universal(ADH; Ivoclar Vivadent), Futurabond U (FUT; Voco GmbH) (Test), and Scotchbond Universal withpre-conditioning (SCO; 3M) (Control), to record bond strength (BS) and type of adhesive failure.Results: The results of the different adhesives (megapascals (MPa)) varied, showing no statisticalsignificance. The corresponding averages are in MPa: ADH, 13.66 2.81; FUT, 14.48 2.88; SCO,14.98 3.96. Additionally, the frequency of type of failure was as follows: mixed (60.7%), adhesive(27.3%), and cohesive (12%). Conclusions: SCO, with a pH of 2.7, showed greater resistance tofracture, while FUT, with a pH of 2.3 and no pre-conditioning, approached the same values, being aone-step adhesive. No relationship was found between failure and type of adhesive.engjournal articlehttps://doi.org/10.3390/app11146349open access616.314-053.2616.314-74Universal adhesivesMicro push-outDeciduous dentitionDentineMateriales dentalesOdontología infantil3213.13 Ortodoncia-Estomatología