Nikolakopoulos, A.Jachowicz, N.Van Dessel, N.Niewczas, K.González Jiménez, RaúlUdías Moinelo, José ManuelPandey, V.2023-06-172023-06-172019-07-310031-900710.1103/PhysRevLett.123.052501https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/13810© 2019 American Physical Society. This work was supported by the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO-Flanders), and by the Special Research Fund, Ghent University. The computational resources (Stevin Supercomputer Infrastructure) and services used in this work were provided by Ghent University, the Hercules Foundation and the Flemish Government. R. G. J. was supported by Comunidad de Madrid and UCM under Contract No. 2017-T2/TIC-5252. K. N. was partially supported by the Polish National Science Center (NCN), under Opus Grant No. 2016/21/B/ST2/01092, as well as by the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education, Grant No. DIR/WK/2017/05. V. P. acknowledges the support by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. PHY-1352106.Differences between nu(e) and nu(mu) quasielastic cross sections are essential in neutrino oscillation analyses and CP violation searches for experiments such as DUNE and T2HK. The ratio of these is however poorly known experimentally and for certain kinematic regions theoretical models give contradictory answers. We use two independent mean-field based models to investigate this ratio using Ar-40 and C-12 targets. We demonstrate that a proper treatment of the final nucleon's wave function confirms the dominance of nu(mu) over nu(e) induced cross sections at forward lepton scattering.engjournal articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.052501https://journals.aps.org/prl/open access539.1OrthogonalityFísica nuclear2207 Física Atómica y Nuclear