Orejudo Prieto De Los Mozos, PatriciaDiez Hochleitner, J.2023-06-152023-06-152012https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/214The main question that arises in Pammer/Hotel Alpenhof is the characterization of contracts as consumer contracts. Indeed, the relevance of the judgment relies on the criteria it gives in order to interpretate the specific provision concerning electronic consumer contracts that Article 15.1 c) Brussels I Regulation settles.spaComments on Savin’s “Jurisdiction in Electronic Contracts and Torts- the Development of the European Court’s Case LawComentarios a "Competencia en contratos e ilícitos electrónicos- el desarrollo de la jurisprudencia del TJUE"book partopen access341.9Private International Law- Jurisdiction- Consumer contracts - ECJ Case Law - Pammer Hotel AlpenhofDerecho internacional privado - Competencia- Contratos de consumo- Jurisprudencia TJUE - Pammer Hotel AlpenhofDerecho internacional privado5603 Derecho Internacional