Haroyan Darbinyan, EvelinaRomeo Rubio, MartaRío Highsmith, Jaime DelLynch, Christopher D.Castillo De Oyague, Raquel2023-06-222023-06-222022-010300-571210.1016/j.jdent.2021.103902https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/71294CRUE-CSIC (Acuerdos Transformativos 2021)Objectives: This in vitro study aimed to find the best combination of mesostructure and veneering materials for full-arch implant-supported hybrid prostheses (HPs) in terms of the fracture resistance (FR) of their cantilevers. Methods: Three groups (n = 5 each) of maxillary HPs were fabricated: Group-1 (CC-A, control): Co-Cr frameworks coated with acrylic resin; Group-2 (CF-A): carbon fiber veneered with acrylic resin; and Group-3 (CF-R): carbon fiber coated with composite resin. All specimens were submitted to 5,000 thermal cycles (5 ◦C – 55 ◦C, dwell time: 30 s), and subjected to a single cantilever bending test in a universal testing machine (crosshead speed: 0.5 mm/min) until failure. The fracture pattern was assessed using stereo microscope and SEM. The one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni tests were run (α= 0.05). Results: The FR yielded significant differences among the three groups (p< 0.001). CC-A samples reached the highest FR values (p ≤ 0.001), whereas both CF-A and CF-R HPs exhibited the comparably (p = 0.107) lowest FR. CC-A specimens failed cohesively (100%): mostly without chipping (80%). CF-A mesostructures were always broken at the connections of the distal implants. CF-R prostheses often failed adhesively (80%). Conclusions: The HPs made of Co-Cr veneered with acrylic demonstrated the best mechanical behavior, being the only group whose 13-mm long cantilevers exceeded the clinically acceptable FR of 900 N. The HPs constructed with carbon fiber frameworks showed, additionally, more unfavorable fracture patterns. Clinical significance: For HPs with cantilevers up to 13 mm, Co-Cr mesostructures coated with acrylic may represent the optimum combination of materials.engAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 EspañaFracture resistance of cantilevered full-arch implant-supported hybrid prostheses with carbon fiber frameworks after thermal cyclingjournal articlehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103902open accessFull-arch implant-supported hybrid prosthesesCantileverProsthetic frameworksCarbon fiberCobalt-chromiumResin veneeringOdontología (Odontología)Prótesis dental3213.13 Ortodoncia-Estomatología3314.02 Prótesis