Person:
Lobato Rincón, Luis Lucio

Loading...
Profile Picture
First Name
Luis Lucio
Last Name
Lobato Rincón
Affiliation
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Faculty / Institute
Psicología
Department
Psicología Experimental, Procesos Cognitivos y Logopedia
Area
Psicología Básica
Identifiers
UCM identifierORCIDScopus Author IDDialnet ID

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Item
    Project number: 300
    Guía gráfica de afecciones oculares secundarias a patologías sistémicas
    (2023) Sánchez Ramos, Celia; Bonnin Arias, Cristina Natalia; Lobato Rincón, Luis Lucio; Llorens Casado, María Belén; Pitarch Velasco, Aída; Bueno Fernández,Sara; Blázquez Sánchez, Vanesa; Dorronzoro Ramirez, Emilio; Domínguez Valdés, Teresa; Ortín Trujillano, Francisco Javier
    Esta guía didáctica constituye una completa base de datos de patologías sistémicas generales, infecciosas y neurodegenerativas, que sirve tanto de material de aprendizaje y autoevaluación para estudiantes, así como de material de consulta y comparación para profesionales del área de Ciencias de la Visión y Oftalmología.
  • Item
    Changes in contrast sensitivity perception due to protector screens for welding tasks : conventional protective optical filter vs novel protective optical filter of selective absorbance
    (2012) Bonnin Arias, Cristina Natalia; Aguirre Vilacoro, V.; Chamorro Gutiérrez, E.; Lobato Rincón, Luis Lucio; Langa Moraga, Antonio; Navarro Valls, J.J.; Sánchez Ramos, Celia
    Purpose: To evaluate diff erences in contrast sensitivity perception in central visual field using protective optic fi lters for welding tasks. Two interposed filters are compared: a conventional protective optical fi lter and a new protective optical fi lter with selective absorption designed by University Complutense of Madrid (UCM). Methods: 36 people of working-age were included in a cross-sectional prospective observational study. Contrast sensitivity threshold in central visual fi eld was evaluated using FDT Perimeter, C-20 procedure (Humphrey systems, USA). ! ree conditions were set: a) without optical fi lters; b) with an interposition of conventional protective optical fi lter for welding (shade 2.5) and c) with an interposition of a novel protective optical fi lter of selective absorbance that fully blocks the short wavelength light and minimally attenuates the remaining bands of the visible spectrum. Results: Contrast sensitivity in all visual fi eld areas evaluated diminished 91-98% with the conventional protective optical fi lters. UCM optical fi lters provoked a low-level decrease in contrast sensitivity (9-19%). Mean contrast sensitivity thresholds were 29.5±5dB, 25.5±4dB, 1.8±2dB in conditions a, b and c respectively Conclusion: Conventional optical fi lters resulted in drastically diminished contrast sensitivity. UCM optical fi lter minimally diminish the visual function, allowing a suitable visibility and also maintaining an appropriate level of protection against phototoxic damage.