Person:
Lobato Rincón, Luis Lucio

Profile Picture
First Name
Luis Lucio
Last Name
Lobato Rincón
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/80224
Affiliation
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Faculty / Institute
Psicología
Department
Psicología Experimental, Procesos Cognitivos y Logopedia
Area
Psicología Básica
Identifiers
UCM identifierORCIDScopus Author IDDialnet ID

Filters

2012 - 201922020 - 20231
Reset filters

Settings

Author: Sánchez Ramos, Celia ×

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Project number: 300
    Guía gráfica de afecciones oculares secundarias a patologías sistémicas
    (2023) Sánchez Ramos, Celia; Bonnin Arias, Cristina Natalia; Lobato Rincón, Luis Lucio; Llorens Casado, María Belén; Pitarch Velasco, Aída; Bueno Fernández,Sara; Blázquez Sánchez, Vanesa; Dorronzoro Ramirez, Emilio; Domínguez Valdés, Teresa; Ortín Trujillano, Francisco Javier
    Esta guía didáctica constituye una completa base de datos de patologías sistémicas generales, infecciosas y neurodegenerativas, que sirve tanto de material de aprendizaje y autoevaluación para estudiantes, así como de material de consulta y comparación para profesionales del área de Ciencias de la Visión y Oftalmología.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Changes in contrast sensitivity perception due to protector screens for welding tasks : conventional protective optical filter vs novel protective optical filter of selective absorbance
    (2012) Bonnin Arias, Cristina Natalia; Aguirre Vilacoro, V.; Chamorro Gutiérrez, E.; Lobato Rincón, Luis Lucio; Langa Moraga, Antonio; Navarro Valls, J.J.; Sánchez Ramos, Celia
    Purpose: To evaluate diff erences in contrast sensitivity perception in central visual field using protective optic fi lters for welding tasks. Two interposed filters are compared: a conventional protective optical fi lter and a new protective optical fi lter with selective absorption designed by University Complutense of Madrid (UCM). Methods: 36 people of working-age were included in a cross-sectional prospective observational study. Contrast sensitivity threshold in central visual fi eld was evaluated using FDT Perimeter, C-20 procedure (Humphrey systems, USA). ! ree conditions were set: a) without optical fi lters; b) with an interposition of conventional protective optical fi lter for welding (shade 2.5) and c) with an interposition of a novel protective optical fi lter of selective absorbance that fully blocks the short wavelength light and minimally attenuates the remaining bands of the visible spectrum. Results: Contrast sensitivity in all visual fi eld areas evaluated diminished 91-98% with the conventional protective optical fi lters. UCM optical fi lters provoked a low-level decrease in contrast sensitivity (9-19%). Mean contrast sensitivity thresholds were 29.5±5dB, 25.5±4dB, 1.8±2dB in conditions a, b and c respectively Conclusion: Conventional optical fi lters resulted in drastically diminished contrast sensitivity. UCM optical fi lter minimally diminish the visual function, allowing a suitable visibility and also maintaining an appropriate level of protection against phototoxic damage.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Controlled pupilar miosis to improve mesopic visual function in drivers over 40 years old.
    (2012) Navarro Valls, J; Ramírez Mercado, G.; Pérez Carrasco, María Jesús; Lobato Rincón, Luis Lucio; Chamorro, E.; Sánchez Ramos, Celia
    Purpose: To evaluate the influence of a difuse illumination device located outside the field of vision that provokes a controlled pupillar miosis, on the visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in drivers tested in mesopic conditions Methods: Cross‐sectional prospective observational study in which visual Acuity 100% and 20% contrast by ETDRS Test (VA100 and VA20) and Contrast Sensitivity by Pelli‐ Robson Test (CS) were evaluated in 39 drivers individuals under 40 years old and 30 drivers over 40. The study was carried out in a simulated setting for night driving with and without the interposition of the difuse illumination device Results: In individuals aged over 40 years, an statistically significant improvement of visual function was exhibit. Baseline visual acuity and contrast sensitivity scores were: VA100=0.02±0.18logMAR, VA20=0.21±0.2logMAR, and CS=0.62±0.32, whereas values for the interposition of difuse illumination device were: VA100=‐0.03±0.14logMAR(p=0.02), VA20=0.19±0.17logMAR(p=0.3), and CS=0.76±0.33(p=0.0003). On the other hand, in drivers aged under 40, statistically significance was not found. In this condition, baseline visual function was: VA100=‐0.1±0.11logMAR, VA20=0.13±0.19logMAR, and CS=1.06±0.2, whereas the interposition of the mentioned system showed the following values: VA100=0.01±0.09logMAR(p=0.9), VA20=0.09±0.14logMAR(p=0.3), and CS=1.08±0.16(p=0.6) Conclusion :Using difuse illumination device in the interior of the vehicle, provides significant improvement in both high contrast visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in the group older than 40 years