Person:
Berrendero Dávila, Santiago

Profile Picture
First Name
Santiago
Last Name
Berrendero Dávila
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/86554
Affiliation
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Faculty / Institute
Odontología
Department
Odontología Conservadora y Prótesis
Area
Estomatología
Identifiers
UCM identifierScopus Author IDDialnet ID

Filters

2021 - 20234
Reset filters

Settings

Author: Berrendero Dávila, Santiago × Start date: 2020 ×

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Project number: 352
    Integración de las redes sociales en la comunicación y la visibilidad de la Facultad de Odontología UCM
    (2023) Figuero Ruiz, Elena; Martínez Rus, Francisco; Salido Rodríguez-Manzaneque, María Paz; Pérez-Higueras Sánchez-Escalonilla, Juan; Berrendero Dávila, Santiago; Alonso Álvarez, Bettina María; Iniesta Albentosa, Margarita Isabel; Ríoboo Crespo, María Del Rosario; Barahona Vara, Tommy; Galán Santos, Paloma; Martínez Ferrero, María; Díaz Martínez, Daniel Enrique
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Accuracy of five different 3D printing workflows for dental models comparing industrial and dental desktop printers
    (Clinical Oral Investigations, 2022) Morón Conejo, Belén; López Vilagran, Jesús; Cáceres, David; Berrendero Dávila, Santiago; Pradies Ramiro, Guillermo
    Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy, in terms of trueness and precision, of printed models using five different industrial and dental desktop 3D printers. Materials and methods Full-arch digital models with scanbodies of 15 patients were printed with five different 3D printers. The industrial printers were 3D system Project MJP2500 (3DS) and Objet30 OrthoDesk (Obj). The dental desktop printers were NextDent 5100 (ND), Formlabs Form 2 (FL) and Rapidshape D30 (RS). A total of 225 printed models were analysed. The printed models were digitized and compared with the reference cast model using the Control X software (Geomagic). The descriptive statistics and one-way ANOVA with the post hoc Tukey test were performed (α = 0.05). Results The one-way ANOVA for the trueness and precision of the printed model presented the best results for the 3DS, followed by ND, Obj, FL and RS (P < 0.01). In the scanbody zone, the best results were for the 3DS group, followed by Obj, ND, FL and RS (P < 0.01). Comparing the technologies, the Multijet technology used in industrial printers presented better results than the DLP and SLA technologies used in dental desktop printers (P > 0.01). Conclusions There were statistically significant differences in terms of the accuracy of the printed models, with better results for the industrial than the dental desktop 3D printers. Clinical relevance The industrial 3D printers used in dental laboratories presented better accuracy than the in-office dental desktop 3D printers, and this should be considered when the best accuracy is needed to perform final prosthetic restorations.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Project number: 399
    Uso del escáner facial en odontología para el conocimiento de parámetros estéticos en docencia de Prótesis I
    (2021) Ferreiroa Navarro, Alberto; Pradies Ramiro, Guillermo; Martinez Rus, Francisco; Salido Rodriguez-Manzaneque, María Paz; Gómez Cogolludo, Pablo; Valverde Espejo, Arelhys; Berrendero Dávila, Santiago
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Project number: 322
    Integración de un equipamiento de escaneado intraoral en la actividad docente de la asignatura de Prótesis I
    (2022) Ferreiroa Navarro, Alberto; Pradies Ramiro, Guillermo; Salido Rodriguez-Manzaneque, María Paz; Valverde Espejo, Arelhys; Gómez Cogolludo, Pablo; Martinez Rus, Francisco; Berrendero Dávila, Santiago; García Naranjo, Ana María