Person: Estrada Pérez, Vicente
Loading...
First Name
Vicente
Last Name
Estrada Pérez
Affiliation
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Faculty / Institute
Medicina
Department
Medicina
Area
Medicina
Identifiers
4 results
Search Results
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
Item Endotelina : un nuevo péptido regulador cardiovascular(2002) Estrada Pérez, Vicente; Fernández-Cruz Pérez, ArturoItem Clinical profile and prognosis in patients on oral anticoagulation before admission for COVID-19(European Journal of Clinical Investigation, 2021) Rivera Caravaca, José Miguel; Nuñez Gil, I. J.; Vivas Balcones, Luis David; Macaya Miguel, Carlos; Fernández Ortiz, Antonio Ignacio; Estrada, Vicente; Estrada Pérez, VicenteEstudio observacional donde se compararon en 1.002 pacientes con COVID-19 durante la primera ola de la pandemia el efecto del tratamiento anticoagulante previo sobre la mortalidad intrahospitalaria. El estudio concluyó que los pacientes hospitalizados con COVID-19 y que tomaban previamente anticoagulación presentaron menor supervivencia y muchas más comorbilidades. Background The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) shows high morbidity and mortality, particularly in patients with concomitant cardiovascular diseases. Some of these patients are under oral anticoagulation (OAC) at admission, but to date, there are no data on the clinical profile, prognosis and risk factors of such patients during hospitalization for COVID-19. Design Subanalysis of the international ‘real-world’ HOPE COVID-19 registry. All patients with prior OAC at hospital admission for COVID-19 were suitable for the study. All-cause mortality was the primary endpoint. Results From 1002 patients included, 110 (60.9% male, median age of 81.5 [IQR 75-87] years, median Short-Form Charlson Comorbidity Index [CCI] of 1 [IQR 1-3]) were on OAC at admission, mainly for atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism. After propensity score matching, 67.9% of these patients died during hospitalization, which translated into a significantly higher mortality risk compared to patients without prior OAC (HR 1.53, 95% CI 1.08-2.16). After multivariate Cox regression analysis, respiratory insufficiency during hospitalization (HR 6.02, 95% CI 2.18-16.62), systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) during hospitalization (HR 2.29, 95% CI 1.34-3.91) and the Short-Form CCI (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.03-1.49) were the main risk factors for mortality in patients on prior OAC. Conclusions Compared to patients without prior OAC, COVID-19 patients on OAC therapy at hospital admission showed lower survival and higher mortality risk. In these patients on OAC therapy, the prevalence of several comorbidities is high. Respiratory insufficiency and SIRS during hospitalization, as well as higher comorbidity, pointed out those anticoagulated patients with increased mortality risk.Item Use of Monoclonal Antibodies in Immunocompromised Patients Hospitalized with Severe COVID-19: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort(Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2023) Calderón Parra, Jorge; Guisado Vasco, Pablo; Montejano Sánchez, Rocío; Estrada Pérez, Vicente; Cuevas Tascón, Guillermo; Aguareles Gorines, José; Arribas, José; Erro Iribarren, Marta; Calvo Salvador, Marina; Fernández Cruz, Ana; Ramos Martínez, Antonio; Muñez Rubio, ElenaObjective: We aim to describe the safety and efficacy of sotrovimab in severe cases of COVID-19 in immunocompromised hosts. Methods: We used a retrospective multicenter cohort including immunocompromised hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 treated with sotrovimab between October 2021 and December 2021. Results: We included 32 patients. The main immunocompromising conditions were solid organ transplantation (46.9%) and hematological malignancy (37.5%). Seven patients (21.9%) had respiratory progression: 12.5% died and 9.4% required mechanical ventilation. Patients treated within the first 14 days of their symptoms had a lower progression rate: 12.0% vs. 57.1%, p = 0.029. No adverse event was attributed to sotrovimab. Conclusions: Sotrovimab was safe and may be effective in its use for immunocompromised patients with severe COVID-19. More studies are needed to confirm these preliminary data.Item Specific Cellular and Humoral Immune Responses to the Neoantigen RBD of SARS-CoV-2 in Patients with Primary and Secondary Immunodeficiency and Healthy Donors(Biomedicines, 2023) Mohamed, Kauzar Mohamed; Guevara Hoyer, Kissy; Jiménez García, Carlos; García Bravo, Laura; Rodríguez de la Peña, Antonia; Mediero Valeros, Beatriz; Cañizares Velázquez, Cristina; Culebras López, Esther; Cabello, Noemí; Estrada Pérez, Vicente; Fernández Arquero, Miguel; Ocaña, Alberto; Delgado-Iribarren García-Campero, Albert; Martínez-Novillo González, Mercedes; Bolaños, Estefanía; Anguita Mandly, Eduardo Luis; Peña Cortijo, Ascensión; Benavente Cuesta, Celina; Benítez Fuentes, Javier David; Pérez Segura, Pedro; Sánchez Ramón, Silvia MaríaPatients with antibody deficiency disorders, such as primary immunodeficiency (PID) or secondary immunodeficiency (SID) to B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder (B-CLPD), are two groups vulnerable to developing the severe or chronic form of coronavirus disease caused by SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19). The data on adaptive immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 are well described in healthy donors, but still limited in patients with antibody deficiency of a different cause. Herein, we analyzed spike-specific IFN-γ and anti-spike IgG antibody responses at 3 to 6 months after exposure to SARS-CoV-2 derived from vaccination and/or infection in two cohorts of immunodeficient patients (PID vs. SID) compared to healthy controls (HCs). Pre-vaccine anti-SARS-CoV-2 cellular responses before vaccine administration were measured in 10 PID patients. Baseline cellular responses were detectable in 4 out of 10 PID patients who had COVID-19 prior to vaccination, perceiving an increase in cellular responses after two-dose vaccination (p < 0.001). Adequate specific cellular responses were observed in 18 out of 20 (90%) PID patients, in 14 out of 20 (70%) SID patients and in 74 out of 81 (96%) HCs after vaccination (and natural infection in some cases). Specific IFN-γ response was significantly higher in HC with respect to PID (1908.5 mUI/mL vs. 1694.1 mUI/mL; p = 0.005). Whereas all SID and HC patients mounted a specific humoral immune response, only 80% of PID patients showed positive anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG. The titer of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG was significantly lower in SID compared with HC patients (p = 0.040), without significant differences between PID and HC patients (p = 0.123) and between PID and SID patients (p =0.683). High proportions of PID and SID patients showed adequate specific cellular responses to receptor binding domain (RBD) neoantigen, with a divergence between the two arms of the adaptive immune response in PID and SID patients. We also focused on the correlation of protection of positive SARS-CoV-2 cellular response to omicron exposure: 27 out of 81 (33.3%) HCs referred COVID-19 detected by PCR or antigen test, 24 with a mild course, 1 with moderate symptoms and the remaining 2 with bilateral pneumonia that were treated in an outpatient basis. Our results might support the relevance of these immunological studies to determine the correlation of protection with severe disease and for deciding the need for additional boosters on a personalized basis. Follow-up studies are required to evaluate the duration and variability in the immune response to COVID-19 vaccination or infection.