Pactos, alianzas electorales y trashumancias: patrones de la cooperación estratégica en el sistema de partidos de la República Dominicana
Loading...
Full text at PDC
Publication date
2015
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Centro de Investigación y Docencia económicas
Citation
Abstract
¿Cómo negocian y qué intercambian los partidos políticos dominicanos? A partir del examen de los pactos, alianzas y experiencias transfuguistas en República Dominicana, se presenta un modelo de cooperación estratégica en el que se clasifican las modalidades de interacción según los protagonistas (élites, partidos o candidatos), en una orientación dicotómica (particularista versus generalista) determinada por el repertorio de incentivos y costos asociados. La experiencia dominicana demuestra que la capacidad de negociación no siempre se pone al servicio de la gobernabilidad democrática, sino que puede reforzar el proceso de institucionalización perversa.
How do Dominican political parties negotiate and what do they exchange? Analyzing the political agreements, electoral alliances and party shifting in Dominican Republic, this article presents a model of strategic cooperation, his types of interaction based on the principal actors (elites, parties or candidates), in a dual orientation (particularistic versus universalistic) determined by incentives and associate costs. The Dominican experience shows that the negotiate skills not always are used in the name of democratic governance, but reinforce the perverse institutionalization process.
How do Dominican political parties negotiate and what do they exchange? Analyzing the political agreements, electoral alliances and party shifting in Dominican Republic, this article presents a model of strategic cooperation, his types of interaction based on the principal actors (elites, parties or candidates), in a dual orientation (particularistic versus universalistic) determined by incentives and associate costs. The Dominican experience shows that the negotiate skills not always are used in the name of democratic governance, but reinforce the perverse institutionalization process.