Comparison of visual performance between two aspheric monofocal intraocular lens models

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorPoyales Galán, Francisco
dc.contributor.authorGarzón Jiménez, Nuria
dc.contributor.authorZhou, Ying
dc.contributor.authorMillán García Varela, María Sagrario
dc.contributor.authorVega Lerin, Fidel
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-16T14:17:52Z
dc.date.available2023-06-16T14:17:52Z
dc.date.issued2021-11-18
dc.descriptionReceived 1 September 2021; Revised 12 October 2021; Accepted 18 November 2021.
dc.description.abstractClinical relevance: It is important to distinguish between visual acuity, optical quality and quality of vision when outcomes obtained with intraocular lenses are evaluated. These parameters, that include objective and subjective tests, should be assessed to obtain results that is not biased. Background: To assess the difference in visual and optical quality between two monofocal intraocular lens models. Methods: : This was a prospective, parallel and randomised clinical study conducted at Miranza IOA, a private clinic in Madrid, Spain. Sixty patients were implanted bilaterally, 30 per group, with two aspheric IOLs with induced spherical aberration of −0.27 μm for Group A and −0.20 μm for Group B. Visual outcomes obtained at 1 and 3 months after surgery included both uncorrected (UCVA) and corrected monocular distance visual acuity (DCVA), objective scattering index (OSI), modulation transfer function (MTF) cut-off, Strehl Ratio (SR), contrast sensitivity defocus curve (CSDC), intraocular lens spherical aberration (SA), and longitudinal chromatic aberration of the eye. Activity limitations in daily life was assessed using CatQuest-9SF questionnaire. Results: There were statistically significant differences for DCVA (004 LogMAR; p = .008) and SR (0.03;p = .003) between groups. Outcomes related to CSDC showed statistically significant differences for vergences between −0.50 D and +1.00 D (3mmpupil) and for vergences of 0.00 D and +0.50 D (4.5 mm pupil) between groups. Overall, Group A showed better results regarding visual and optical quality, including a lower longitudinal chromatic aberration result in comparison to Group B. Patient satisfaction evaluated with CatQuest-9SF showed that Group A achieved better outcomes, although the differences were statistically significant only for the ‘Reading text on television’ item (p = 0.027). Conclusions: Both intraocular lens models showed excellent quantity of vision, optical and visual quality as well as high patient satisfaction. Despite this, the the Group A model provided slightly better outcomes than the Group B model.
dc.description.departmentDepto. de Optometría y Visión
dc.description.facultyFac. de Óptica y Optometría
dc.description.refereedTRUE
dc.description.sponsorshipJohnson and Johnson Vision
dc.description.statuspub
dc.eprint.idhttps://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/69103
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/08164622.2021.2009737
dc.identifier.issn1444-0938
dc.identifier.officialurlhttps://doi.org/10.1080/08164622.2021.2009737
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/4571
dc.journal.titleClinical and Experimental Optometry
dc.language.isoeng
dc.page.initial8 p.
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis y Optometrists Association Australia
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/
dc.subject.cdu617.7-089.243
dc.subject.cdu617.751
dc.subject.cdu681.7.066.3
dc.subject.cdu681.732.066
dc.subject.cdu612.843.6
dc.subject.keywordMonofocal intraocular lens
dc.subject.keywordoptical quality
dc.subject.keywordquantity of vision
dc.subject.keywordvisual quality
dc.subject.ucmOptometría
dc.subject.ucmÓptica oftálmica
dc.subject.ucmMateriales ópticos
dc.subject.unesco2209.15 Optometría
dc.subject.unesco2209.14 Propiedad ópticas de los sólidos
dc.titleComparison of visual performance between two aspheric monofocal intraocular lens models
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication367ce491-287f-4b2a-ba6a-870a393c5609
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery367ce491-287f-4b2a-ba6a-870a393c5609
Download
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
TCEO_A_2009737_PROOF vN_rM.pdf
Size:
1.34 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
downoload Download
Collections
Artículos