Analysis of the Influence of Diabetic Nephropathy in Patients with Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis
dc.contributor.author | García Álvarez, Yolanda | |
dc.contributor.author | Álvaro Afonso, Francisco Javier | |
dc.contributor.author | García-Madrid Martín De Almagro, Marta | |
dc.contributor.author | Tardaguila García, Aroa | |
dc.contributor.author | López Moral, Mateo | |
dc.contributor.author | Lázaro Martínez, José Luis | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-03-24T19:38:24Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-03-24T19:38:24Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-08-26 | |
dc.description | Special Issue Updates on Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis) | |
dc.description.abstract | This study analyzed the influence of diabetic nephropathy on the healing prognosis after conservative surgery in diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO). A retrospective observational study was carried out between January 2021 and December 2022 and involved 278 outpatients with a diagnosis of DFO at a specialized diabetic foot unit, including 74 (26.62%) patients with DN (group 2) and 204 (73.38%) patients without DN (group 1). There were 266 (95.70%) ulcers on the forefoot, 8 (2.90%) on the midfoot, and 4 (1.45%) on the hindfoot (p = 0.992). The healing rates were 85.1% (n = 63) for group 2 and 81.3% (n = 165) for group 1 (p = 0.457). When exploring the influence of DN on the risk of delayed ulcer healing, the results did not show a significant effect [12 (6; 28) weeks among patients with DN vs. 12 (6; 21) weeks among patients without DN; p = 0.576]. No significant differences were observed in complications, with one (2.59%) death occurring in group 1 (p = 0.296) and three minor amputations being performed in both groups [two (5.13%) amputations in group 1 vs. one amputation (9.09%) in group 2; p = 0.217]. Bone cultures were performed for a total of 190 patients (133 in group 1 and 57 in group 2). Of these, 176 positive bone cultures were isolated: 71 positive bone cultures (57.7%) were monomicrobial cultures in group 1, with 30 (56.6%) in group 2. There were 52 (42.3%) that had at least two microorganisms in group 1, and 23 (43.4%) in group 2 (p = 0.890). The most frequently prescribed oral antibiotic was amoxicillin/clavulanate (43.89%), followed by levofloxacin (28.4%), and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (14.7%). This study shows that DN does not have a significant influence on the healing prognosis of patients with DFO after conservative surgery. | |
dc.description.department | Depto. de Enfermería | |
dc.description.faculty | Fac. de Enfermería, Fisioterapia y Podología | |
dc.description.refereed | TRUE | |
dc.description.status | pub | |
dc.identifier.citation | García-Álvarez, Y.; Álvaro-Afonso, F.J.; García-Madrid, M.; Tardáguila-García, A.; López-Moral, M.; Lázaro-Martínez, J.L. Analysis of the Influence of Diabetic Nephropathy in Patients with Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 5557. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12175557 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/jcm12175557 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2077-0383 | |
dc.identifier.officialurl | https://doi.org/10.3390/JCM12175557 | |
dc.identifier.relatedurl | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/17/5557 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/118922 | |
dc.issue.number | 17 | |
dc.journal.title | Journal of Clinical Medicine | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.page.final | 11 | |
dc.page.initial | 1 | |
dc.publisher | MDPI | |
dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International | en |
dc.rights.accessRights | open access | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
dc.subject.cdu | 616.718.7/.9 | |
dc.subject.keyword | diabetic foot | |
dc.subject.keyword | diabetic foot ulcers | |
dc.subject.keyword | diabetic foot infection | |
dc.subject.keyword | diabetic foot osteomyelitis | |
dc.subject.keyword | diabetic nephropathy | |
dc.subject.keyword | conservative surgery | |
dc.subject.ucm | Podología | |
dc.subject.unesco | 3299 Otras Especialidades Médicas | |
dc.title | Analysis of the Influence of Diabetic Nephropathy in Patients with Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis | |
dc.type | journal article | |
dc.type.hasVersion | VoR | |
dc.volume.number | 12 | |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 2fc5c1f3-4cec-46e7-94af-0ce91bd7ea75 | |
relation.isAuthorOfPublication | a27b946b-f7c8-4c5c-83e2-8d55eb03be12 | |
relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 140eaeb5-d999-4908-90af-8e9f8376c897 | |
relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 61d4fe0a-d8de-4690-8e48-3f49dd22293e | |
relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 38430380-ceed-4c8f-a40e-39bef50a5c51 | |
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 2fc5c1f3-4cec-46e7-94af-0ce91bd7ea75 |
Download
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- Analysis_of_the_Influence.pdf
- Size:
- 564.4 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format