Aviso: para depositar documentos, por favor, inicia sesión e identifícate con tu cuenta de correo institucional de la UCM con el botón MI CUENTA UCM. No emplees la opción AUTENTICACIÓN CON CONTRASEÑA
 

Analysis of the Influence of Diabetic Nephropathy in Patients with Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis

dc.contributor.authorGarcía Álvarez, Yolanda
dc.contributor.authorÁlvaro Afonso, Francisco Javier
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Madrid Martín De Almagro, Marta
dc.contributor.authorTardaguila García, Aroa
dc.contributor.authorLópez Moral, Mateo
dc.contributor.authorLázaro Martínez, José Luis
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-24T19:38:24Z
dc.date.available2025-03-24T19:38:24Z
dc.date.issued2023-08-26
dc.descriptionSpecial Issue Updates on Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis)
dc.description.abstractThis study analyzed the influence of diabetic nephropathy on the healing prognosis after conservative surgery in diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO). A retrospective observational study was carried out between January 2021 and December 2022 and involved 278 outpatients with a diagnosis of DFO at a specialized diabetic foot unit, including 74 (26.62%) patients with DN (group 2) and 204 (73.38%) patients without DN (group 1). There were 266 (95.70%) ulcers on the forefoot, 8 (2.90%) on the midfoot, and 4 (1.45%) on the hindfoot (p = 0.992). The healing rates were 85.1% (n = 63) for group 2 and 81.3% (n = 165) for group 1 (p = 0.457). When exploring the influence of DN on the risk of delayed ulcer healing, the results did not show a significant effect [12 (6; 28) weeks among patients with DN vs. 12 (6; 21) weeks among patients without DN; p = 0.576]. No significant differences were observed in complications, with one (2.59%) death occurring in group 1 (p = 0.296) and three minor amputations being performed in both groups [two (5.13%) amputations in group 1 vs. one amputation (9.09%) in group 2; p = 0.217]. Bone cultures were performed for a total of 190 patients (133 in group 1 and 57 in group 2). Of these, 176 positive bone cultures were isolated: 71 positive bone cultures (57.7%) were monomicrobial cultures in group 1, with 30 (56.6%) in group 2. There were 52 (42.3%) that had at least two microorganisms in group 1, and 23 (43.4%) in group 2 (p = 0.890). The most frequently prescribed oral antibiotic was amoxicillin/clavulanate (43.89%), followed by levofloxacin (28.4%), and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (14.7%). This study shows that DN does not have a significant influence on the healing prognosis of patients with DFO after conservative surgery.
dc.description.departmentDepto. de Enfermería
dc.description.facultyFac. de Enfermería, Fisioterapia y Podología
dc.description.refereedTRUE
dc.description.statuspub
dc.identifier.citationGarcía-Álvarez, Y.; Álvaro-Afonso, F.J.; García-Madrid, M.; Tardáguila-García, A.; López-Moral, M.; Lázaro-Martínez, J.L. Analysis of the Influence of Diabetic Nephropathy in Patients with Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 5557. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12175557
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/jcm12175557
dc.identifier.issn2077-0383
dc.identifier.officialurlhttps://doi.org/10.3390/JCM12175557
dc.identifier.relatedurlhttps://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/17/5557
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/118922
dc.issue.number17
dc.journal.titleJournal of Clinical Medicine
dc.language.isoeng
dc.page.final11
dc.page.initial1
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.cdu616.718.7/.9
dc.subject.keyworddiabetic foot
dc.subject.keyworddiabetic foot ulcers
dc.subject.keyworddiabetic foot infection
dc.subject.keyworddiabetic foot osteomyelitis
dc.subject.keyworddiabetic nephropathy
dc.subject.keywordconservative surgery
dc.subject.ucmPodología
dc.subject.unesco3299 Otras Especialidades Médicas
dc.titleAnalysis of the Influence of Diabetic Nephropathy in Patients with Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis
dc.typejournal article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number12
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication2fc5c1f3-4cec-46e7-94af-0ce91bd7ea75
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationa27b946b-f7c8-4c5c-83e2-8d55eb03be12
relation.isAuthorOfPublication140eaeb5-d999-4908-90af-8e9f8376c897
relation.isAuthorOfPublication61d4fe0a-d8de-4690-8e48-3f49dd22293e
relation.isAuthorOfPublication38430380-ceed-4c8f-a40e-39bef50a5c51
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery2fc5c1f3-4cec-46e7-94af-0ce91bd7ea75

Download

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Analysis_of_the_Influence.pdf
Size:
564.4 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections