Aviso: para depositar documentos, por favor, inicia sesión e identifícate con tu cuenta de correo institucional de la UCM con el botón MI CUENTA UCM. No emplees la opción AUTENTICACIÓN CON CONTRASEÑA
 

Study on new FR silicone stabilizer for liquid CO2 technology

dc.contributor.authorMelle Hernández, Alejandro
dc.contributor.authorDesnier, M.C.
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-20T17:01:30Z
dc.date.available2023-06-20T17:01:30Z
dc.date.issued1999
dc.description.abstractSince the implementation of the Montreal Protocol and the Clean Air Act Amendment of 1990, the polyurethane industry has been searching for ways to reduce or eliminate auxiliary blowing agents (ABAs) from foam manufacturing processes. Many possible solutions have been explored, both mechanical and chemical, with no simple cost-effective solution for total elimination. Alternative blowing agents have been explored for many years, which include: HCFCs, acetone and most recently carbon dioxide. Although these materials are reasonable options, carbon dioxide has shown the most promise because it is safe (i.e. non-flammable) to use and also inexpensive. Also CO2 is a non-hazardous chemical which can be incorporated in the system and used to blow the foam down to low densities. Today there are three machine manufacturers with commercial equipment to produce flexible foam using auxiliary CO2 as a blowing agent: Cannon CarDio(R), Hennecke NovaFlex(R) and Beamech CO-2(TM) machines. With the introduction of these machines it is clear that this is a viable, inexpensive method to reduce and/or eliminate regulated blowing agents. Since these are new manufacturing processes, chemical manufacturers are diligently working with the technologies to identify the best raw materials for trouble-free processing and optimum foam quality. The mechanical and chemical differences between conventional and the CO2-based foaming processes indicate that the role of the silicone stabilizer is process dependent. Laboratory froth and foam experiments have been conducted to evaluate and predict which silicone stabilizers are the most viable for this new foaming process.
dc.description.departmentDepto. de Álgebra, Geometría y Topología
dc.description.facultyFac. de Ciencias Matemáticas
dc.description.refereedTRUE
dc.description.statuspub
dc.eprint.idhttps://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/16847
dc.identifier.issn0262-4893
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/57644
dc.issue.number4
dc.journal.titleCellular polymers
dc.page.final283
dc.page.initial271
dc.publisherRapra Technology Ltd.
dc.rights.accessRightsmetadata only access
dc.subject.cdu544
dc.subject.keywordFoam(plastics)
dc.subject.keywordPolyurethane
dc.subject.keywordFlexible structure
dc.subject.keywordFoaming process
dc.subject.keywordProperty formulation relationship
dc.subject.keywordBlowing agent
dc.subject.keywordCarbon dioxide
dc.subject.keywordAdditive
dc.subject.keywordStabilizer agent
dc.subject.keywordSurfactant polymer
dc.subject.keywordSiloxane polymer
dc.subject.keywordPorosity
dc.subject.keywordExperimental study
dc.subject.ucmQuímica física (Química)
dc.titleStudy on new FR silicone stabilizer for liquid CO2 technology
dc.typejournal article
dc.volume.number18
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationc5f952f6-669f-4e3d-abc8-76d6ac56119b
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryc5f952f6-669f-4e3d-abc8-76d6ac56119b

Download

Collections