Democracia finalista y defensa de la Constitución española
Loading...
Download
Full text at PDC
Publication date
2012
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
UNED
Citation
Abstract
La doctrina del Tribunal constitucional rechaza, para nuestro ordenamiento jurídico, el concepto de «democracia militante» y predica un procedimiento de reforma de la Constitución no sujeto a ningún límite material. Con ello el Estado constitucional y democrático se coloca ante uno de sus más peligrosos dilemas: modelo meramente formal o democracia axiológica y finalista. Sin embargo, la interpretación sistemática y teleológica de la Constitución puede permitir una mejor defensa de la ciudadanía y de su democracia.
The jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court in Spanish Juridical Order rejects the concept of «militant democracy» and presents a procedure of constitutional reform without any material limit. A dangerous dilemma exists for the Constitutional Democratic State; a choice between a merely formal model and an axiological finalist democracy. However, a systematic and teleological interpretation of the Constitution could improve the defence of citizenship and democracy
The jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court in Spanish Juridical Order rejects the concept of «militant democracy» and presents a procedure of constitutional reform without any material limit. A dangerous dilemma exists for the Constitutional Democratic State; a choice between a merely formal model and an axiological finalist democracy. However, a systematic and teleological interpretation of the Constitution could improve the defence of citizenship and democracy