Defining a Target Population to Effectively Test a Neuroprotective Drug

dc.contributor.authorOlivé-Gadea, Marta
dc.contributor.authorRubiera, Marta
dc.contributor.authorHernández Jiménez, Macarena
dc.contributor.authorRibo, Marc et al.
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-09T15:44:14Z
dc.date.available2025-01-09T15:44:14Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-11
dc.description.abstractBackground and purpose: We aim to identify the subgroup of acute ischemic stroke patients with higher probabilities of benefiting from a potential neuroprotective drug using baseline outcome predictors and test whether different selection criteria strategies can improve detected treatment effect. Methods: We analyzed the association between final infarct volume (FIV), measured on 24- to 72-hour computed tomography, and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale at discharge/day 5 of acute stroke patients who underwent endovascular treatment. Models were adjusted for age, sex, and affected hemisphere. We analyzed the impact of absolute (5-15 mL) and relative (33%) FIV reductions in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale in the whole population and in different subsets of patients selected according to baseline imaging criteria using computed tomography perfusion. Results: We analyzed 627 patients; association between FIV and 5-day National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale was best described with a quadratic function, with a regression coefficient β=1.56 ([95% CI, 1.45-1.67] P<0.001) in the adjusted analysis. In the models considering a fixed absolute (5/15 mL) FIV reduction, treatment effect was highest when patients with predicted larger FIV were excluded, whereas in a 33% FIV reduction model, treatment effect increased with the exclusion of patients with expected excellent outcomes. Conclusions: Patients either with excellent outcomes after endovascular thrombectomy or with large infarcts may dilute the treatment effect in stroke neuroprotective drug trials. Computed tomography perfusion on admission may help selecting adequate patients according to expected drug effect profile.
dc.description.departmentDepto. de Farmacología y Toxicología
dc.description.facultyFac. de Medicina
dc.description.refereedTRUE
dc.description.statuspub
dc.identifier.citationOlivé-Gadea M, Requena M, Campos D, Garcia-Tornel A, Deck M, Muchada M, Boned S, Rodríguez N, Juega J, Rodríguez-Luna D, Pagola J, Rubiera M, Hernández-Jiménez M, Molina CA, Ribo M. Defining a Target Population to Effectively Test a Neuroprotective Drug. Stroke. 2021 Jan;52(2):505-510. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.032025. Epub 2021 Jan 11. PMID: 33423513.
dc.identifier.doi10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.032025
dc.identifier.officialurlhttps://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.032025
dc.identifier.relatedurlhttps://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.032025?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/113565
dc.issue.number2
dc.journal.titleStroke
dc.language.isoeng
dc.page.final510
dc.page.initial505
dc.publisherAHA Journals
dc.rights.accessRightsrestricted access
dc.subject.cdu61
dc.subject.keywordInfarction
dc.subject.keywordIschemia
dc.subject.keywordNeuroprotection
dc.subject.keywordPatient selection
dc.subject.keywordProbability
dc.subject.ucmCiencias Biomédicas
dc.subject.unesco32 Ciencias Médicas
dc.titleDefining a Target Population to Effectively Test a Neuroprotective Drug
dc.typejournal article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number52
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication52bbca1a-0ef1-446c-888f-38f558932b65
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery52bbca1a-0ef1-446c-888f-38f558932b65

Download

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
olivé-gadea-et-al-2021-defining-a-target-population-to-effectively-test-a-neuroprotective-drug.pdf
Size:
375.63 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections