Aviso: para depositar documentos, por favor, inicia sesión e identifícate con tu cuenta de correo institucional de la UCM con el botón MI CUENTA UCM. No emplees la opción AUTENTICACIÓN CON CONTRASEÑA
 

Sugar Content in Processed Foods in Spain and a Comparison of Mandatory Nutrition Labelling and Laboratory Values

dc.contributor.authorYusta-Boyo, María José
dc.contributor.authorBermejo López, Laura María
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Solano, Marta
dc.contributor.authorLópez Sobaler, Ana María
dc.contributor.authorOrtega Anta, Rosa María
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Pérez, Marta
dc.contributor.authorDal-Re Saavedra, María Ángeles
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-17T09:21:25Z
dc.date.available2023-06-17T09:21:25Z
dc.date.issued2020-04-13
dc.description.abstractTo reduce the sugar content of processed foods through reformulation, the first step is to determine the content of the largest sources of sugars in each country’s diet. The aim of this work was to describe the sugar content in the most commonly consumed processed foods in Spain and to compare that sugar’s labelling and laboratory analysis values (LVs and AVs, respectively) to confirm its adequacy. A sample of the 1173 most commonly consumed processed foods in Spain (28 groups; 77 subcategories) was collected. For each product, the total sugar content was compared according to its AV and LV. The median (25th –75th percentiles, interquartile range) sugar content by group was calculated for the total sample, and the groups were classified as “high sugar content” when this value was above 22.5 g/100g of product. The adequacy of the LV, according to the European Union (EU) tolerance requirements, was then evaluated, and each subcategory median was compared with the AV to determine its appropriateness via a median test for independent samples (p < 0.05). In total, 10 out of 28 groups presented high sugar content. Moreover, 98.4% of the products met the EU tolerance ranges. Finally, only one subcategory (“cured ham”) presented significant differences between the AV and LV median values (0.4 g vs. 0.1 g sugar/100g, p < 0.05). The groups of food products whose sugar content reduction could have the greatest impact on public health were identified. In addition, our study showed the high adequacy of LV with the EU labeling tolerance requirements, as well as the LV’s appropriateness as a tool to implement actions aimed at reducing sugar consumption.
dc.description.departmentDepto. de Nutrición y Ciencia de los Alimentos
dc.description.facultyFac. de Farmacia
dc.description.refereedTRUE
dc.description.sponsorshipSpanish Food Safety and Nutrition Agency
dc.description.statuspub
dc.eprint.idhttps://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/69663
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/nu12041078
dc.identifier.issn2072-6643
dc.identifier.officialurlhttps://doi.org/10.3390/nu12041078
dc.identifier.relatedurlhttps://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/12/4/1078
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/8649
dc.issue.number4
dc.journal.titleNutrients
dc.language.isoeng
dc.page.initial1078
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.rightsAtribución 3.0 España
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
dc.subject.cdu612.39
dc.subject.keywordnutrition labeling
dc.subject.keywordfood labeling
dc.subject.keywordfood processing
dc.subject.keywordnutrition policy
dc.subject.keywordSpain
dc.subject.keywordfood analysis
dc.subject.keyworddietary sugars
dc.subject.keywordreformulation
dc.subject.ucmDietética y nutrición (Farmacia)
dc.titleSugar Content in Processed Foods in Spain and a Comparison of Mandatory Nutrition Labelling and Laboratory Values
dc.typejournal article
dc.volume.number12
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication0d7f9370-6879-4fde-bd82-e1c6bcd4f2f9
relation.isAuthorOfPublication5a1f67d3-9556-473b-bbaa-eebec1ff7b4f
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationa582404e-c3fe-4a54-9a7a-88caeb81a064
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery0d7f9370-6879-4fde-bd82-e1c6bcd4f2f9

Download

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
nutrients-12-01078-v2.pdf
Size:
1.91 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections