Estudio clínico descriptivo transversal de la fiabilidad de registros intermaxilares obtenidos mediante escaneado digital intraoral

Thumbnail Image
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
Advisors (or tutors)
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Google Scholar
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
UCM subjects
Unesco subjects
Birnbaum N.S. Aaronson H.B. Stevens C. Cohen B. 3D Digital Scanners: A High-Tech Approach to More Accurate Dental Impressions. Inside Dentistry; 2009; 5: 70-74. Birnbaum N.S. Aaronson H.B. Dental Impressions Using 3D Digital Scanners: Virtual Becomes. Reality Compendium. 2008; 29(8):494-505. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; i:307-10. Breeding L.C. Dixon D.L. Kinderknecht K.E. Accuracy of three interocclusal recording materials used to mount a working cast. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1994; 71(3): 265-270. Calberson F.L. Hommez G.M. De Moor R.J. Fraudulent use of digital radiography: Methods to detect and protect digital radiographs. Journal of Endodontics. 2008; 34(5): 530-536. Carey JP. Craig M. Kerstein RB. Radke J. Determining a Relationship Between Applied Occlusal Load and Articulating Paper Mark Area. The Open Dentistry Journal. 2007; 1: 1-7. Cuperus A M R. Harms MC. Frits A. R, Ewald M. Bronkhorst, Jan G. J. H. Schols, K. Hero Breuningf. Dental models made with an intraoral scanner: A validation study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012; 142:308-13 Davies S, Al-Ani Z, Jeremiah H, Winston D, Smith P. Reliability of recording static and dynamic occlusal contact marks using transparent acetate sheet. J Prosthetic Dent. 2005; 94:458-61 Davies SJ, Gray RJ, Al-Ani MZ, Sloan P. Worthington H. Inter- and 24. intraoperator reliability of the recording of occlusal contacts using occlusal sketch acetate technique. Br Dent J. 2002; 193:397-400. Delong, R., Ko, C.C., Anderson, G.C. Hodges, J.S. Douglas, W.H. Comparing máximum intercuspal contacts of virtual dental patients and mounted dental cast. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2002; 88(6): 622-630. Delong R. Knorr S. Anderson G.C. Hodges J. Pintado M.R. Accuracy of contacts calculated from 3D images of occlusal surfaces. Journal of Dentistry. 2007; 35(6):528-534. Durbin DS, Sadowsky C. Changes in tooth contacts following or18. thodontictreatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1986; 90:375-82. Fasbinder D.J. Digital Dentistry: Innovation for Restorative Treatment. Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry. 2011. Gazit E. Fitzig S. Lieberman MA. Reproducibility of occlusal marking techniques. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1986; 55(4): 505-509. Gümüş H.O. Kılınç H.I. Tuna S.H. Özcan N. Computerized analysis of occlusal contacts in bruxism patients treated with occlusal splint therapy. J Adv Prosthodont 2013; 5:256-61. Hiew LT. Ong SH. Foong KWC. Visualizing oclussal contact points using laser surface dental scan. Proceedings. 2009; 23: 615-619. Ingervall B. Tooth contacts on the functional and non-functional side in children and young adults. Arch Oral Biol. 1972; 17: 191-200. Johnson GH. Craig RG. Accuracy of four types of rubber impression materials compared with time of pour and a repeat pour of models. J Prosthet Dent. 1985; 53: 484–490. Kifune R. Honma S. Hara K. The development of a new occlusal sound checker. Nihon Shishubyo Gakkai Kaishi. 1985; 27:482-91. Korioth TW. Number and location of occlusal contacts in intercuspal position. J Prosthet Dent. 1990; 64:206-10. Kusnoto B, Evans CA. Reliability of a 3D surface laser scanner for orthodontic applications. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2002; 122(4):342-48. Logozzo S. Franceschini G. Kilpelä A. Caponi M. Governi L. Blois L. A Comparative Analysis Of Intraoral 3d Digital Scanners For Restorative Dentistry. The Internet Journal of Medical Technology. 2011; 5 (1). DOI: 10.5580/1b90 McDevitt W.E. Warreth A.A. Oclusal contacts in máximum intercuspation in normal dentitions. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 1997; 24: 725-734. McCullock. A.J. Making Occlusion Work: 1. Terminology, Occlusal Assessment and Recording. Dent Update 2003; 30: 150-157. McCullock. A.J. Making Occlusion Work: 2. Terminology, Occlusal Assessment and Recording. Dent Update 2003; 30: 211-219. Millstein PL. Maya A. An evaluation of occlusal contact marking indicators: a descriptive, qualitative method. JADA. 2001; 132: 1280-1286. Okeson. JP. Criterios de Oclusión Funcional Óptima. En: Okeson JP. Tratamiento de olcusión y afecciones temporomandibulares. 5ª ed. Madrid: Elsevier; 2003. p. 109-125. Persson A.S.K. Andersson M. Oden A. Sandborgh-Englunda G. Computer aided analysis of digitized dental stone replicas by dental CAD/CAM technology. Dental Materials. 2008; 24: 1123-1130. Persson A.S.K. Andersson M. Oden A. Sandborgh-Englunda G. A three-dimensional evaluation of a laser scanner and a touch-probe scanner. J Prosthet Dent. 2006; 95:194-200 Prasad DK. Prasad BR. Prasad DA. Mehra D. Interocclusal Records in Prosthodontic Rehabilitations - Materials and Techniques - A Literature Review. Nitte University Journal of Health Science. NUJHS. 2012; 2(3): 54-60. Quaas S. Rudolph H. Luthardt R.G. Direct mechanical data acquisition of dental impressions for the manufacturing of CAD/CAM restorations. Journal of Dentistry. 2007; 35:903–908. Redmond. Vasudavan. Sullivan. Sonis. Comparison of Intraoral 3D Scanning and Conventional Impressions for Fabrication of Orthodontic Retainers. 2010; 8: 495-498. Saracoglu A. Özpinar B. In vivo and in vitro evaluation of occlusal indicator sensitivity. J Prosthet Dent. 2002; 88: 522-6. Sharma A. Rahul G.R. Poduval S.T. Shetty K. Gupta B. Rajora V. History of materials used for recording static and dynamic occlusal contact marks: a literature review. J Clin Exp Dent. 2013; 5(1): 48-53. Skurnik H. Accurate interocclusal records. J Prosth Dent. 1969; 21(2): 154-165. Sohmura T. Kojima T. Wakabayashi K. Takahashi J. Use of an ultrahigh-speed laser scanner for constructing three-dimensional shapes of dentition and occlusion. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2000; 84(3):345-52. Stragga R.W. Comparison of oclussal contacts on mounted dental models to contacts identified on digital 3D models using a new virtual alignment method. A Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Science in The Faculty of Graduate Studies (Dental Science) The University of Bristish Columbia (Vancouver) April 2009 Sturb JR, Rekow ED WS. Computer-aided design and fabrication of dental restoration. Current systems and future possibilities. JADA. 2006; 137(9):1289–96. Takai A. Nakano M. Bando E. Hewlett ER. Evaluation of three occlusal examination methods used to record tooth contacts in lateral excursive movements. J Prosthet Dent. 1993; 70:500-5 Van der Meer W.J. Andriessen F.S. Wismeijer D. Ren Y. (2012) Application of Intra-Oral Dental Scanners in the Digital Workflow of Implantology. PLoSONE 7(8): e43312. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0043312 Wilson C. Andrade F. Buarque WA. Brait A. Buarque L. Comparison between two methods to record occlusal contacts in habitual maximal intercuspation. Braz J Oral Sci. 2006; 5(19):1239-1243. Yuzbasioglu E. Kurt H. Turunc R. Bilir H. Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: evaluation of patients’ perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes BMC Oral Health. 2014; 14(10). Ziebert GJ, Donegan SJ. Tooth contacts and stability before and after occlusal adjustment. J Prosthetic. 1979; 42:276-81.