Los límites de la teoría dominante del valor
| dc.contributor.author | Peláez Gramajo, José Guillertmo | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-06-17T13:36:06Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-06-17T13:36:06Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Este artículo examina la teoría dominante del valor propuesta por Walras, que desemboca en una teoría subjetiva del valor con valor de uso absoluto, rareté, y valor de cambio constreñido a una expresión relativa determinada por el ingrediente absoluto, el rareté. El máximo apogeo de esta propuesta del análisis del equilibrio general se alcanza en 1954 con la demostración de existencia de Arrow y Debreu; sin embargo, a finales de esa década este proyecto empieza a mostrar sus limitaciones en el terreno del desequilibrio con las críticas de Koopmans (1957) y Scarf (1960). Posteriormente, Arrow y Hahn (1971) evidencian las limitaciones de esta teoría del equilibrio general respecto a resultados de alcance general y, finalmente, la teoría dominante del valor colapsa con los aportes de Sonnenschein (1972, 1973); Mantel (1974 y 1976); y Debreu en (1974). En conclusión, la falla fundamental de la teoría económica dominante radica en el carácter absoluto de la subjetividad del valor, valor de uso; en efecto, el axioma fundamental de la teoría económica es la teoría del valor. | |
| dc.description.abstract | This paper analyses the dominant theory of value proposed by Walras, which leads to a subjective theory of value with absolute use value, rareté, and exchange value constrained to a relative expression determined by the absolute ingredient, the rareté, accordingly the determinant of value is use value. This proposal of general equilibrium analysis got the boom in 1954 with prove of its existence posed by Arrow and Debreu; nevertheless, at the end of that decade this project begins to show its limitations in the field of disequilibrium with the criticisms of Koopmans (1957) and Scarf (1960). Later, Arrow and Hahn (1971) highlight the limitations of this general equilibrium theory, in terms of its lack results of general scope and finally, the dominant theory of value collapses with the contributions of Sonnenschein (1972, 1973); Mantel (1974 and 1976); and Debreu in (1974). In conclusion, the fundamental flaw of the dominant economic theory lies in the absolute nature of the subjectivity of value, use value; in effect, the fundamental axiom of economic theory is the theory of value. | |
| dc.description.department | Depto. de Economía Aplicada, Estructura e Historia | |
| dc.description.faculty | Fac. de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales | |
| dc.description.refereed | TRUE | |
| dc.description.status | pub | |
| dc.eprint.id | https://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/58120 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.5209/ijhe.66196 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2386-5768 | |
| dc.identifier.officialurl | https://dx.doi.org/10.5209/ijhe.66196 | |
| dc.identifier.relatedurl | https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/IJHE | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/13833 | |
| dc.issue.number | 2 | |
| dc.journal.title | Iberian Journal of the History of Economic Thought | |
| dc.language.iso | spa | |
| dc.page.final | 212 | |
| dc.page.initial | 189 | |
| dc.publisher | Universidad Complutense de Madrid | |
| dc.rights | Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0 España | |
| dc.rights.accessRights | open access | |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/es/ | |
| dc.subject.jel | C62 | |
| dc.subject.jel | D46 | |
| dc.subject.jel | D5 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | Teoría del valor | |
| dc.subject.keyword | Teoría del equilibrio general | |
| dc.subject.keyword | Desequilibrio | |
| dc.subject.keyword | Existencia y estabilidad del equilibrio. | |
| dc.subject.keyword | Theory of value | |
| dc.subject.keyword | General equilibrium theory | |
| dc.subject.keyword | Disequilibrium | |
| dc.subject.keyword | Existence and stability of equilibrium. | |
| dc.subject.ucm | Optimización matemática | |
| dc.subject.ucm | Microeconomía | |
| dc.subject.unesco | 5307.15 Teoría Microeconómica | |
| dc.title | Los límites de la teoría dominante del valor | |
| dc.title.alternative | The limits of the dominant theory of value | |
| dc.type | journal article | |
| dc.volume.number | 6 | |
| dcterms.references | Arrow, K. and Hahn, F. (1971 [1991]). General Competitive Analysis. North–Holand Sixth Printing. Arrow, K. and L. Hurwicz (1958). “On the Stability of the Competitive Equilibrium, I”. Econometrica, 26, pp.522-552. Arrow, Kenneth; Block, H. D. y Hurwicz, Leonid (1959). “On The Stability of the Competitive Equilibrium, II”. Econometrica, 27, pp. 82-109. Arrow, Kenneth; Block, H. D. y Hurwicz, Leonid (1972 [1974]). “General Economic Equilibrium: Purpose, Analytic Techniques, Collective Choice”. The American Economic Review, Vol. 64, No. 3, pp. 263-272. Benassy J. P. (1986). “On Competitive Market Mechanisms”. Econometrica, Vol. 54, No. 1, pp. 95-108. Clower, R. W. (1967). “A reconsideration of the microfundations of monetary Theory” , in Money And Markets, Essays by Robert W. Clower. Edited By Donald A. Walker. Cambridge University Press 1984. Debreu, G. y H. Scarf (1963). “A limit Theorem on the Core of an Economy”. International Economic Review, 4 (3), 235-246. Debreu, G. y H. Scarf (1970). “Economies With a finite set of Equilibria”. Econometrica, Vol. 38 (May), No 3, P. 387-393. Debreu, G. y H. Scarf (1974). “Excess Demand Functions”. Journal of Mathematical Economics, Vol. I, pp. 15-21. Debreu, G. y H. Scarf (1991). “The Mathematization of Economic Theory”. The American Economic Review, Vol. 81, No. 1, pp. 1-7. Descartes, R. (1668). A discourse on the method of correctly conducting one’s reason and seeking truth in the sciences; translated with an introduction and notes by Ian Maclean. Printed in Great Britain by Clays Ltd, St. Ives plc., Suffolk. Dierker, Edgerbert (1972). “Two Remarks on the number of Equilibria of an Economy”. Econometrica, Vol. 40, No 5 (September 1972). P. 951-953. Edgeworth, Francis Ysidro (1881). Mathematical Psychics, an essay on the application of mathematics to the moral sciences. Augustus M. Kelley Publishers, New York 1967. Edgeworth, Francis Ysidro (1925). Papers Relating to Political Economy, Burt Franklin, New York. Feyerabend, Paul (1978). Science in a Free Society, London: New Left Books. Fisher F. (1978). “Quantity Constraints, Spillovers and the Hahn Process”. The Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 46, P. 19-31. Fisher F. (1981). “Stability, Disequilibrium Awareness, and the Perception of new Opportunities”, Econometrica, Vol. 49, No. 2, pp. 279-317. Fisher F. (1983). Disequilibrium Foundations of Equilibrium Economics. Cambridge University Press. Fisher F. (2005). Liquid Assets, An Economic Approach for Water Management and Conflict Resolution in the Middle East and Beyond. Fisher F. (2011). “The Stability of general equilibrium – what do we know and why is it important”, in General Equilibrium Analysis, A Century after Walras. Edited by Pascal Bridel. Routledge, 34-45. Gode, D. K., and S. Sunder. 1993. Allocative Efficiency of Markets with Zero Intelligence Traders: Market as a Partial Substitute for Individual Rationality. Journal of Political Economy 101:119-37. Grodal, Birgit (1996). Profit Maximization and Imperfect Competition. In Economics in a Changing World. Vol. 2 of Microeconomics, edited by B. Allen. New York: St. Martin’s. Hahn, F. (1958). “Gross Substitutes and the Dynamic Stability of General Equilibrium”. Econometrica, 26, pp.169-170. Hahn, F. (1982). “Stability”, in K. Arrow and M. Intrilligator (eds), Handbook of Mathematical Economics, Vol. II, Chapter 16, P. 745-793. Hahn, F. and T. Negishi (1962). “Theorem on Non-Tâtonnement Stability”, Econometrica, Vol. 30, P. 463-469. Hicks, J. R. (1939 [1946]). Value and Capital (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. Hume, D (1739). Tratado sobre la naturaleza humana, Ensayo para introducir el método del razonamiento experimental en los asuntos morales. LIBROS EN LA RED Edición Electrónica: Diputación de Albacete – Servicio de Publicaciones – Gabinete Técnico www.dipualba.es/publicaciones 2001. Ingrao, B., and G. Israel. 1990. The Invisible Hand: Economic Equilibrium in the History of Science. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Jevons, W. S. (1871 [1970]). The Theory of Political Economy. Edited with an introduction by R. D. Collison Black. Penguin Books Inc. 1970. Jevons, W. S. (1875 [1896]). Money and the Mechanism of Exchange. Appleton and Company, New York, 1896. The International Scientific Series, Volume XVII. The Online Library Of Liberty. Kant, Immanuel (1781). Critique of Pure Reason up to the end of the Analytic. Copyright © Jonathan Bennett 2017. All rights reserved. http://www.earlymoderntexts.com/assets/pdfs/kant1781part1.pdf. Kehoe, Timothy J. 1985. Multiplicity of Equilibria and Comparative Statics. Quarterly Journal of Economics 100:119-48. Kehoe, Timothy J. (1991). Computation and Multiplicity of Equilibria. In vol. 4 of Handbook of Mathematical Economics, edited by W. Hildenbrand and H. Sonnenschein. Amsterdam: North-Holland. Kemp, Murray C., and Koji Shimomura. 2002. The Sonnenschein-Debreu-Mantel Proposition and the Theory of International Trade. Review of International Economics 10:671-79. Keynes, J. M. (1936). (1936 [2003]). Teoría General de la Ocupación, el Interés y el Dinero. Fondo de Cultura Económica, México D. F. 1992, duodécima reimpresión de la segunda edición en español, corregida, 1965. Keynes, J. M. (1938 [1994]). Letter to Harrod on 4 July 1938. In The Philosophy of Economics, an Anthology, Second Edition, Edited by Daniel M. Hausman 1994, pp. 287, Cambridge University Press. Kirman, Alan (1989). The Intrinsic Limits of Modern Economic Theory: The Emperor Has No Clothes. Economic Journal 99:126-39. Kirman, Alan (1992). Whom or What Does the Representative Individual Represent? Journal of Economic Perspectives 6:117–36. Kirman, Alan (2004). Economics and Complexity. Advances in Complex Systems 7:139–55. Kirman, Alan, and Karl Josef Koch. 1986. Market Excess Demand in Exchange Economies with Collinear Endowments. Review of Economic Studies 174:457-63. Lakatos, I (1971). “History of Science and Its Rational Reconstruction.” In Buck and Cohen, 1971, pp. 91-136. Lakatos, I (1978). “The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes”. Vol. 1 of his Philosophical Papers. Edited by John Worrall and Gregory Currie. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Lange, O. (1938). “On the Economic Theory of Socialism”. B. Lippincott, ed., University of Minnesota Press, pp. 57-142. Lange, O. (1942). “Say Law: A Restatement and Criticism”. In Lange et al., eds., Studies in Mathematical Economics and Econometrics, University of Chicago Press, pp. 49-68. Leibniz, Gottfried W. (1686) Discurso de metafísica. Traducción de Alfonso Castaño Piñán, file:///F:/BACK%20UP/KINGSTON/LIBROS%20Y%20ARTICULOS/Captura%20de%20Libros/LEIBNIZ/Leibniz%20Discurso-de-Metafisica.pdf. Mantel, R. (1974). “On the Characterization of Aggregate Excess Demand”. Journal of Economic Theory 7, pp. 348-353. Mantel, R. (1976). “Homothetic Preferences and Community Excess Demand Functions”. Jounal of Econoic Theory, Vol. 12, pp.197-201. Marx, K. (1859 [1993]). A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy. Translated by S.W. Ryazanskaya. On–Line Version: Marx.org 1993 (Preface, 1993), Marxists.org 1999. Transcribed: Tim Delaney, Zodiac HTML Markup: Tim Delaney 1999. Marx, K. (1863). Theories of Surplus–Value [Volume IV of Capital]. Written: 1863; Source: Theories of Surplus Value, Progress Publishers; Past Work: Julio Huato Scan: YongLee Goh Mark-up: Hans G. Ehrbar. eBooks: ePub version, PRC version. Marx, K. (1867 [2001]). El Capital. Tomo I, Volumen I, Traducción de Siglo Veintiuno Editores S.A., México D.F. Vigésimo cuarta edición en español, 2001. Mas-Colell, A.; M. Whinston and J. Green (1995). Microeconomic Theory. Oxford University Press. Metzler, L. (1945). “Stability of Multiple Markets: The Hicks Conditions”. Econometrica, 13, pp.277-292. Morishima (1957). “Notes on the Theory of Stabillity of Multiple Exchange”. Review of Economic Studies, XXIV, pp.203-208. Morishima (1958). “A Note on the Stability of an Economy where all Goods are Gross Substitutes”. Econometrica, 26, pp. 445-447. Nachbar, John H. 2002. General Equilibrium Comparative Statics. Econometrica 79:2065-74. Nachbar, John H. (2004). General Equilibrium Comparative Statics: The Discrete Case with Production. Journal of Mathematical Economics 40:153-63.i Negishi, T. (1958). “A Note on the Stability of an Economy where all Goods are Gross Substitutes”. Econometrica, 26, pp. 445-447. Negishi, T. (1985). “Jevons, Edgeworth, and the Competitive Equilibrium of Exchange”. In Economic Theories in non–walrasian tradition. Cambriedge University Press. Nozick, R. (1974). “Anarchy, State and Utopia”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, vol. 4, num. 3, pp. 223-47. Peláez J. G. (1996). “Estabilidad y conciencia de desequilibrio”, Análisis Económico, Volumen XIII. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Unidad Azcapotzalco, México. Peláez J. G. (2004) “El tanteo de Léon Walras y la hipótesis diagonal dominante”, Economía, teoría y práctica, vol. 21, pp. 61-83. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, México. Tanteo walrasiano https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tanteo_walrasiano. Peláez J. G. (2009) “Desequilibrio y tendencia al equilibrio en la teoría de Walras Hipótesis implícita de información limitada”, Economía, teoría y práctica, vol. 21, pp. 61-83. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, México. Rader, T. (1972). Theory of Microeconomics, Academic Press, New York, 1972. Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justicie. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Ricardo, David (1817 [1821, 1973]). Principios de Economía Política y Tributación. Traducción al Español del Fondo de Cultura Económica, de la tercera edición, segunda reimpresión 1973. Rebeyrol, A. (1999). La pensée économique de Walras, Dunod, París. Rizvi, S. Abu Turab 1990. Essays on Supply-and-Demand Theory: Mathematical Determinateness and Economic Relevance. PhD diss., New School for Social Research. Versión en español de S. Abu Turab Rizvi, https://read.dukeupress.edu/hope/article-abstract/38/Suppl_1/228/38306/The-Sonnenschein-Mantel-Debreu-Results-after. Rizvi, S. Abu Turab (1994a). Game Theory to the Rescue? Contributions to Political Economy 13:1-28. Rizvi, S. Abu Turab (1994b). The Microfoundations Project in General Equilibrium Theory. Cambridge Journal of Economics 18:357-77. Robbins, Lionel (1932 [1935]). An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. Macmillan 2nd Edition. Roberts, J. and H. Sonnenschein (1977). “On the Foundations of the Theory of Monopolistic Competition.” Econometrica, 45, pp. 101-113. Samuelson, Paul (1941). “The Stability of Equilibrium”. Econometrica, Vol. 9, No 2, pp. 97-120. Samuelson, P. y W. Nordhaus (1948 [2002]). Economía, Traducción de la décimo séptima Edición en español por McGraw–Hill/Interamericana de España S.A.U. Scarf, H. (1960). “Some Examples of Global Instability of the Competitive Equilibrium”. International Economic Review, Vol. I, 157-172. Sent, E.–M. (2004). Behavioral Economics: How Psychology Made Its (Limited) Way Back into Economics. HOPE 36.4:735-60. Sent, E.–M. (2005). Pluralisms in Economics. In Scientific Pluralism, edited by S. Kellert, H. Longino, and K. Waters. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Smith, Adam (1776 [1987]). Investigación sobre la Naturaleza y Causas de la Riqueza de las Naciones. Fondo de Cultura Económica, S.A. de C.V. México D.F, 1987. Sonnenschein, Hugo (1972). “Market Excess Demand Functions”. Econometrica, Vol. 40, pp.549-563. Sonnenschein, Hugo (1973a). “Do Walras’ Identity and Continuity Characterize the Class of Community Excess Demand Functions?” Journal of Economic Theory, No. 6, pp. 345-354. Sonnenschein, Hugo (1973b). “The Utility Hypothesis and Market Demand Theory”. Western Economic Journal, 404-410. Spinoza, Baruch (1663). Una nueva ética para la liberación humana. Editorial Biblioteca Nueva, S. L., Madrid, 2015 Almagro, 38 28010 Madrid www.bibliotecanueva.es editorial@bibliotecanueva.es Sraffa, Piero (1960). Production of Commodities by means of Commodities, Prelude to a Critique to Economic Theory. Vora & Co., Publishers PVT. LTD 3, Round Building, Bobay 2. Indian Edition, 1963. Published by K. K. Vora, Vora & Co. Stigler, George (1982). Do economists matter? In The Economist as Preacher, and Other Essays. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Stoker, Thomas M. (1984a). Completeness Distribution Restrictions and the Form of Aggregate Functions. Econometrica 52:887-907. Stoker, Thomas M. (1984b)). Exact Aggregation and Generalized Slutsky Conditions. Journal of Economic Theory 33:368-77. Varian, R. Hal (1975 [1979]). “Distributive Justice, Welfare Economics, and the Theory of Fairness”, in Hahn and Hollis (eds.) (1979) Philosophy and Economic Theory, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 1346-54. Walras, Léon (1873). “Principe d’une théorie mathématique de l’échange”, mémoire lu à l’Académie des sciencés morales et politiques, à Paris. Publié dans les Séances et travaux de cette académie en janvier 1874; republié in Walras, 1993. Walras, Léon (1874 [1900]). Elements of Pure Economics or The Theory of Social Wealth. Translated for William Jaffé (1954). Richard D. Irwin, INC, Second Impression 1965. | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication |
Download
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
