Para depositar en Docta Complutense, identifícate con tu correo @ucm.es en el SSO institucional. Haz clic en el desplegable de INICIO DE SESIÓN situado en la parte superior derecha de la pantalla. Introduce tu correo electrónico y tu contraseña de la UCM y haz clic en el botón MI CUENTA UCM, no autenticación con contraseña.

Evidence of microalgal isotopic fractionation through enrichment of depleted uranium

Citation

Baselga-Cervera, B., García-Balboa, C., López-Rodas, V., Fernández Díaz, M., & Costas, E. (2019). Evidence of microalgal isotopic fractionation through enrichment of depleted uranium. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 1973. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-38740-2

Abstract

Resulting from the nuclear fuel cycle, large amounts of depleted uranium (DU) tails are piling up, waiting for possible use or final disposal. To date, the recovery of the residual 235U isotope contained in DU has been conducted only marginally by physical processes. Relative isotope abundances are often mediated by biological processes, and the biologically driven U isotopic fractionation has been previously identified in reducing bacteria. Our results indicate that the cells of two microalgal strains (freshwater Chlamydomonas sp. (ChlGS) and marine Tetraselmis mediterranea (TmmRU)) took up DU from the exposure solutions, inducing U isotopic fractionation with a preference for the fissile 235U isotope over 238U. The n(235U)/n(238U) isotopic fractionation magnitudes (δ235) were 23.6 ± 12.5‰ and 370.4 ± 103.9‰, respectively. These results open up new perspectives on the re-enrichment of DU tailings, offering a potential biological alternative to obtain reprocessed natural-equivalent uranium. Additionally, the findings present implications for identifying biological signatures in the geologic records

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Description

Author's Contributions B.B., C.G., V.L. and E.C. conceived the presented idea and the experiments. B.B., C.G., V.L. and E.C. carried out the experiments. M.F. contributed to reagents/materials/analysis tools and samples analyzed. B.B., C.G., V.L., M.F. and E.C. contributed to the interpretation of the results. B.B., M.F. and C.G. wrote the manuscript supervised by V.L. and E.C. B.B., C.G., M.F., V.L. and E.C. made important intellectual contributions

UCM subjects

Keywords

Collections