Aviso: para depositar documentos, por favor, inicia sesión e identifícate con tu cuenta de correo institucional de la UCM con el botón MI CUENTA UCM. No emplees la opción AUTENTICACIÓN CON CONTRASEÑA
 

Structural and Geomechanical Analysis of Natural Caves and Rock Shelters: Comparison between Manual and Remote Sensing Discontinuity Data Gathering

dc.contributor.authorBenrabah, A.
dc.contributor.authorSenent Domínguez, S.
dc.contributor.authorCarrera-Ramírez, F.
dc.contributor.authorJorda Bordehore, L.
dc.contributor.authorÁlvarez Alonso, David
dc.contributor.authorDe Andrés Herrero, María
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-16T09:41:55Z
dc.date.available2024-04-16T09:41:55Z
dc.date.issued2024-01-01
dc.description.abstractThe stability of many shallow caves and rock shelters relies heavily on understanding rock discontinuities, such as stratification, faults, and joints. Analyzing these discontinuities and determining their orientations and dispersion are crucial for assessing the overall stability of the cave or shelter. Traditionally, this analysis has been conducted manually using a compass with a clinometer, but it has certain limitations, as only fractures located in accessible areas like the lower part of cave walls and entrances are visible and can be assessed. Over the past decade, remote sensing techniques like LiDAR and photogrammetry have gained popularity in characterizing rocky massifs. These techniques provide 3D point clouds and high-resolution images of the cave or shelter walls and ceilings. With these data, it becomes possible to perform a three-dimensional reconstruction of the cavity and obtain important parameters of the discontinuities, such as orientation, spacing, persistence, or roughness. This paper presents a comparison between the geomechanical data obtained using the traditional manual procedures (compass readings in accessible zones) and a photogrammetric technique called Structure from Motion (SfM). The study was conducted in two caves, namely, the Reguerillo Cave (Madrid) and the Cova dos Mouros (Lugo), along with two rock shelters named Abrigo de San Lázaro and Abrigo del Molino (Segovia). The results of the study demonstrate an excellent correlation between the geomechanical parameters obtained from both methods. Indeed, the combination of traditional manual techniques and photogrammetry (SfM) offers significant advantages in developing a more comprehensive and realistic discontinuity census.
dc.description.departmentDepto. de Prehistoria, Historia Antigua y Arqueología
dc.description.facultyFac. de Geografía e Historia
dc.description.refereedTRUE
dc.description.statuspub
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/rs16010072
dc.identifier.officialurlhttps://doi.org/10.3390/rs16010072
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/103136
dc.issue.number1
dc.journal.titleRemote Sensing
dc.language.isoeng
dc.page.initial72
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject.keywordremote sensing techniques; structure from motion (SfM); geomechanical analysis; caves and shelter; photogrammetry
dc.subject.ucmPrehistoria
dc.subject.unesco5505.01 Arqueología
dc.subject.unesco5504.05 Prehistoria
dc.subject.unesco2506.20 Geología Estructural
dc.titleStructural and Geomechanical Analysis of Natural Caves and Rock Shelters: Comparison between Manual and Remote Sensing Discontinuity Data Gathering
dc.typejournal article
dc.volume.number16
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication51caa4ce-fdb3-4036-89eb-7da5efdb6260
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationa727e5d7-c082-4fac-9e50-e9162e5ea719
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery51caa4ce-fdb3-4036-89eb-7da5efdb6260

Download

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
remotesensing-16-00072-v2 (2).pdf
Size:
13.11 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections