Choice of Magnetometers and Gradiometers after Signal Space Separation
Loading...
Download
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication date
2017
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
MDPI
Citation
Garcés, P., López Sanz, D., Maestu Unturbe, F. & Pereda, E. et al. «Choice of Magnetometers and Gradiometers after Signal Space Separation». Sensors, vol. 17, n.o 12, diciembre de 2017, p. 2926. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.3390/s17122926.
Abstract
Background: Modern Elekta Neuromag MEG devices include 102 sensor triplets containing one magnetometer and two planar gradiometers. The first processing step is often a signal space separation (SSS), which provides a powerful noise reduction. A question commonly raised by researchers and reviewers relates to which data should be employed in analyses: (1) magnetometers only, (2) gradiometers only, (3) magnetometers and gradiometers together. The MEG community is currently divided with regard to the proper answer.
Methods: First, we provide theoretical evidence that both gradiometers and magnetometers result from the backprojection of the same SSS components. Then, we compare resting state and task-related sensor and source estimations from magnetometers and gradiometers in real MEG recordings before and after SSS.
Results: SSS introduced a strong increase in the similarity between source time series derived from magnetometers and gradiometers (r2 = 0.3–0.8 before SSS and r2 > 0.80 after SSS). After SSS, resting state power spectrum and functional connectivity, as well as visual evoked responses, derived from both magnetometers and gradiometers were highly similar (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient > 0.8, r 2 > 0.8).
Conclusions: After SSS, magnetometer and gradiometer data are estimated from a single set of SSS components (usually ≤ 80). Equivalent results can be obtained with both sensor types in typical MEG experiments.