Aviso: para depositar documentos, por favor, inicia sesión e identifícate con tu cuenta de correo institucional de la UCM con el botón MI CUENTA UCM. No emplees la opción AUTENTICACIÓN CON CONTRASEÑA
 

Intratissue Percutaneous Electrolysis vs Corticosteroid Infiltration for the Treatment of Plantar Fasciosis

dc.contributor.authorIborra Marcos, Álvaro
dc.contributor.authorRamos Álvarez, Juan José
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Fabián, Guillermo
dc.contributor.authorLópez Román, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorPolo Portés, Carlos Eduardo
dc.contributor.authorVillanueva, Manuel
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-17T12:27:33Z
dc.date.available2023-06-17T12:27:33Z
dc.date.issued2018-02
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Corticosteroid infiltration (CI) is commonly used for treatment of plantar fasciosis. In recent years, however, interest has grown in the use of intratissue percutaneous electrolysis (EPI) for the treatment of tendinopathies. The aim of our study was to compare the effectiveness of the above techniques in the treatment of plantar fasciosis. METHODS: The results achieved over a period of 1 year following the use of these techniques to treat plantar fasciosis were examined. There were 64 patients; 32 of whom were treated with ultrasound-guided EPI and 32 with ultrasound-guided CI. A clinical examination was performed and ultrasound taken before treatment and at 3, 6, and 12 months. Clinical assessments were made using a visual analog scale (VAS) to record pain and the Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI) to evaluate function. Ultrasound was used to determine the thickness of the plantar fascia. RESULTS: Both the ultrasound-guided EPI and CI techniques were associated with significant clinical and echographic improvements at 12 months post-treatment ( P < .001). CONCLUSION: Both techniques were effective in the treatment of PF, providing excellent VAS pain and FADI results at 12 months. However, CI required fewer patient visits and appeared to provide somewhat better VAS and FADI results.
dc.description.departmentDepto. de Radiología, Rehabilitación y Fisioterapia
dc.description.facultyFac. de Medicina
dc.description.refereedTRUE
dc.description.statusinpress
dc.eprint.idhttps://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/47624
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1071100718754421
dc.identifier.issn1071-1007
dc.identifier.officialurlhttp://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1071100718754421
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/12121
dc.journal.titleFoot and Ankle International
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rights.accessRightsrestricted access
dc.subject.keywordCorticosteroid infiltration
dc.subject.keywordintratissue percutaneous electrolysis
dc.subject.keywordplantar fasciosis
dc.subject.ucmDiagnóstico por imagen y medicina nuclear
dc.subject.ucmMedicina del deporte
dc.subject.ucmMedicina Física y Rehabilitación
dc.subject.ucmSistema musculoesquelético
dc.subject.unesco3204.01 Medicina Nuclear
dc.subject.unesco3204.04 Rehabilitación (Medica)
dc.subject.unesco2411.10 Fisiología del Músculo
dc.titleIntratissue Percutaneous Electrolysis vs Corticosteroid Infiltration for the Treatment of Plantar Fasciosis
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication02a1231b-8d6f-4292-8698-a08094953ddb
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery02a1231b-8d6f-4292-8698-a08094953ddb

Download

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
EPI.IC.2018.pdf
Size:
515.75 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections