CLIL students' affectivity in the transition between education levels: the effect of streaming at the beginning of secondary education
dc.contributor.author | Fernández Agüero, María | |
dc.contributor.author | Hidalgo Mc Cabe, Elisa Ana | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-01-24T11:13:30Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-01-24T11:13:30Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.description | Agencia de financiación : Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad Proyectos de investigación : FECYT -- TRANS-CLIL: INTEGRACION Y EVALUACION DE CONTENIDOS CURRICULARES. This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competition under grant FFI2014-55590-R. | |
dc.description.abstract | This study looks into the affective factors influencing students’ experiences in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) at the beginning of bilingual secondary education (at the age of 11–12), when being streamed into two strands with a different degree of exposure to CLIL, depending on their linguistic competence. Results were drawn from 10 structured interviews with students spotted as salient cases in 157 validated questionnaires. Students’ responses to the interviews were analyzed following Grounded Theory. The categories emerging from the analysis are related to students’ values, attitudes and beliefs towards bilingual education, their motivation, perceptions on learning and degree of satisfaction with their strand. Our findings indicate that instrumental motivation plays an important role in these students’ views, which vary depending on the strand: i.e., students in the high-exposure strand seem to see themselves more at ease and in control of their choices, whereas low-exposure strand students experience more ambivalence over the transition. | |
dc.description.department | Depto. de Didáctica de las Lenguas, Artes y Educación Física | |
dc.description.faculty | Fac. de Educación | |
dc.description.refereed | TRUE | |
dc.description.sponsorship | Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (España) | |
dc.description.status | pub | |
dc.identifier.citation | Fernández-Agüero, M., & Hidalgo-McCabe, E. (2022). CLIL Students’ Affectivity in the Transition between Education Levels: The Effect of Streaming at the Beginning of Secondary Education. Journal of Language, Identity and Education, 21(6), 363-377. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2020.1795864 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/15348458.2020.1795864 | |
dc.identifier.essn | 1534-8458 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1532-7701 | |
dc.identifier.officialurl | https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2020.1795864 | |
dc.identifier.relatedurl | https://produccioncientifica.ucm.es/documentos/6223bb4c5af2aa3bfdb85eab | |
dc.identifier.relatedurl | https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85090453938&origin=resultslist | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/116009 | |
dc.issue.number | 6 | |
dc.journal.title | Journal of Language, Identity & Education | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.page.final | 377 | |
dc.page.initial | 363 | |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis Online | |
dc.relation.projectID | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//FFI2014-55590-R/ES/TRANS-CLIL: INTEGRACION Y EVALUACION DE CONTENIDOS CURRICULARES Y LENGUA EXTRANJERA EN LA TRANSICION DE LA EDUCACION PRIMARIA A SECUNDARIA EN CONTEXTOS BILINGUES/ | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | en |
dc.rights.accessRights | open access | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
dc.subject.cdu | 159.942.3 | |
dc.subject.cdu | 159.953.5 | |
dc.subject.cdu | 81'246.2:37 | |
dc.subject.cdu | 37.015.3 | |
dc.subject.cdu | 81 | |
dc.subject.cdu | 373.5 | |
dc.subject.keyword | Affective factors | |
dc.subject.keyword | Bilingual education | |
dc.subject.keyword | CLIL | |
dc.subject.keyword | Educational transition | |
dc.subject.keyword | Streaming | |
dc.subject.keyword | Student self-image | |
dc.subject.keyword | High school | |
dc.subject.keyword | Factores emocionales | |
dc.subject.keyword | Educación bilingüe | |
dc.subject.keyword | Transición escolar | |
dc.subject.keyword | Transmisión | |
dc.subject.keyword | Autoimagen del alumno | |
dc.subject.keyword | Enseñanza secundaria | |
dc.subject.ucm | Lingüística | |
dc.subject.ucm | Enseñanza de la lengua y la literatura | |
dc.subject.ucm | Psicología de la educación (Educación) | |
dc.subject.ucm | Aprendizaje | |
dc.subject.ucm | Enseñanza secundaria | |
dc.subject.unesco | 5701 Lingüística Aplicada | |
dc.subject.unesco | 5701.11 Enseñanza de Lenguas | |
dc.subject.unesco | 5799 Otras Especialidades Lingüísticas | |
dc.title | CLIL students' affectivity in the transition between education levels: the effect of streaming at the beginning of secondary education | |
dc.type | journal article | |
dc.type.hasVersion | AM | |
dc.volume.number | 21 | |
dcterms.references | Referencias bibliográficas: • Admiraal, W., Westhoff, G., & De Bot, K. (2006). Evaluation of bilingual secondary education in The Netherlands: Students’ language proficiency in English. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12 (1), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610500392160 • Alonso, E., Grisaleña, J., & Campo, A. (2008). Plurilingual education in secondary schools: Analysis of results. International Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Research Journal, 1 (1), 36–49. https://www.icrj.eu/11/article3.html • Alonso-Belmonte, I., & Fernández-Agüero, M. (forthcoming). Teachers’ narratives of resistance to Madrid’s Bilingual Programme: An exploratory study in secondary education. Article submitted for publication. • Apsel, C. (2012). Coping with CLIL: Dropouts from CLIL streams in Germany. International CLIL Research Journal, 1 (4), 47–56. https://www.icrj.eu/14/contents.html • Arnold, J. (Ed.). (1999). Affect in language learning. Cambridge University Press. • Baker, E. L. (2012). Mandated tests: Educational reform or quality indicator? In B. R. Gifford (Ed.), Test policy and test performance: Education, language and culture (pp. 3–24). Kluwer Academic Publishers. • Barcelos, A. M. F. (2015). Unveiling the relationship between language learning beliefs, emotions, and identities. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 5 (2), 301–325. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2015.5.2.6 • Block, D. (2007). Second language identities. Continuum. • Block, D. (2011). Citizenship, education and global spaces. Language and Intercultural Communication, 11 (2), 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2011.556743 • Block, D. (2012). Class and SLA: Making connections. Language Teaching Research, 16 (2), 188–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168811428418 • Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Polity Press. • Bruton, A. (2011). Is CLIL so beneficial, or just selective? Re-evaluating some of the research. System, 39 (4), 523–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.08.002 • Bruton, A. (2013). CLIL: Some of the reasons why and why not. System, 41 (3), 587–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.07.001 • Callahan, R. (2005). English language proficiency and track placement: Variable effects on academic achievement. In J. Cohen, K. T. McAlister, K. Rolstad, & J. MacSwan (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Bilingualism (pp. 429–451). Cascadilla Press. • Cenoz, J., Genesee, F., & Gorter, D. (2014). Critical analysis of CLIL: Taking stock and looking forward. Applied Linguistics, 35 (3), 243–262. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt011 • Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage. • Clarke, A. E. (2003). Situational analysis: Grounded theory mapping after the postmodern turn. Symbolic Interaction, 26 (4), 553–576. https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2003.26.4.553 • Coyle, D. (2007). The CLIL quality challenge. In D. Marsh & D. Wolff (Eds.), Diverse contexts-converging goals: CLIL in Europe (pp. 47–58). Peter Lang. • Coyle, D. (2011). The ITALIC research report: Investigating student gains in content and language integrated learning. University of Aberdeen. • Coyle, D. (2012). Listening to learners: An investigation into successful learning across CLIL contexts. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16 (3), 244–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2013.777384 • Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design. Sage. • Dafouz, E., & Guerrini, M. (Eds.). (2009). CLIL across educational levels: Experiences from primary, secondary and tertiary contexts. Richmond. • Dalton-Puffer, C., Hüttner, J., Schindelegger, V., & Smit, U. (2009). Technology-geeks speak out: What students think about vocational CLIL. International CLIL Research Journal, 1 (2), 18–25. https://www.icrj.eu/12/contents.html • Dalton-Puffer, C., Nikula, T., & Smit, U. (Eds.). (2010). Language use and language learning in CLIL classrooms. John Benjamins. • Dendrinos, B. (2013). Social meanings in global-glocal language proficiency exams. In D. Tsagari, S. Papadima-Sophocleous, & S. Ioannu-Georgiou (Eds.), International experiences in language testing and assessment (pp. 33–57). Peter Lang. • Doiz, A., Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M. (2014). CLIL and motivation: The effect of individual and contextual variables. The Language Learning Journal, 42 (2), 209–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2014.889508 • Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (Eds.). (2009). Motivation, language identity and the L-2 self. Multilingual Matters. • Escobar-Urmeneta, C., & Nussbaum, L. (Eds.). (2011). Learning in a different language. Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona. • European Commission. (1995). White paper on education and training. Teaching and learning. Towards the learning society. Brussels. • European Commission. (2009). Include-ED; Actions for success in schools in Europe. • European Commission. (2017). Key data on teaching languages at school in Europe. Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency. • European Commission (n.d.). About multilingualism policy. Multilingualism. European Commission. Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/education/policies/multilingualism/about-multilingualism-policy_en (accessed 11February 2019). • Fernández-Barrera, A. (2017). Language appropriations, ideologies and identities in bilingual schools in Castilla-La Mancha (Spain). Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & Literature, 10 (2), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/jtl3.731 • Fernández-Río, J., Hortigüela-Alcalá, D., & Pérez-Pueyo, A. (2017). Bilingual education, streaming and secondary education students’ social goals. Revista De Educación, 377, 30–53. http://www.educacionyfp.gob.es/revista-de-educacion/en/numeros-revista-educacion/numeros-anteriores/2017/377/377-2.html • García-Mayo, M. P. (2003). Age, length of exposure and grammaticality judgments in the acquisition of English as a foreign language. In M. P. García-Mayo & M. L. García-Lecumberri (Eds.), Age and the acquisition of English as a foreign language (pp. 94–114). Multilingual Matters. • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Aldine. • Horn, D. (2013). Diverging performances: The detrimental effects of early selection on equality of opportunity in Hungary. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 32, 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2013.01.002 • Hunt, M. (2011). Learners’ perceptions of their experiences of learning subject content through a foreign language. Educational Review, 63 (3), 365–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2011.571765 • Hüttner, J., Dalton-Puffer, C., & Smit, U. (2013). The power of beliefs: Lay theories and their influence on the implementation of CLIL programs. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16 (3), 267–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2013.777385 • Kalaja, P., Barcelos, A. M. F., & Ruohotie, M. (2016). Beliefs, agency and identity in foreign language learning and teaching. Palgrave McMillan. • Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews. An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Sage. • Lasagabaster, D., & López Beloqui, R. (2015). The impact of type of approach (CLIL vs. EFL) and methodology (book-based vs. project work) on motivation. Porta Linguarum, 23, 41–57. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5188930 • Lincoln, Y. S., & Denzin, N. K. (2003). Turning points in qualitative research: Tying knots in a handkerchief. Altamira. • Llinares, A., & Dafouz, E. (2010). Content and language integrated programmes in the Madrid region. Overview and research findings. In D. Lasagabaster & Y. Ruiz de Zarobe (Eds.), CLIL in Spain: Implementation, results and teacher training (pp. 95–114). Cambridge Scholar Publishing. • Lorenzo, F., Casal, S., & Moore, P. (2010). The effects of content and language integrated learning in European education: Key findings from the Andalusian bilingual sections evaluation project. Applied Linguistics, 31 (3), 418–442. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp041 • Madrid Regional Authorities. (2010). Orden 5958/2010, de 7 de diciembre, de la Consejería de Educación, por la que se regulan los colegios públicos bilingües de la Comunidad de Madrid [Order 5958/2010, of December 7, of the Ministry of Education, which regulates bilingual public schools in the Community of Madrid]. Official Regional Government of Madrid Gazette, 17, 36–66. Retrieved from: http://w3.bocm.es/boletin/CM_Boletin_BOCM/2011/01/21/01700.PDF (accessed 11 February 2019). • Madrid Regional Authorities (2018). Madrid, a bilingual community 2017-2018. Dirección General de Innovación, Becas y Ayudas a la Educación de la Consejería de Educación, Juventud y Deporte de la Comunidad de Madrid. • Martín Rojo, L. (2013). (De)capitalising students through linguistic practices: A comparative analysis of new educational programmes in a global era. In A. Duchêne, M. Moyer, & C. Roberts (Eds.), Language, migration and social inequalities:A critical sociolinguistic perspective on institutions and work (pp. 118–146). Multilingual Matters. • Martín Rojo, L. (2017). Neoliberalism and linguistic governmentality. In J. W. Tollefson & M. Pérez-Milans (Eds.), Oxford handbook of language policy and planning (pp. 544–567). Oxford University Press. • Massler, U. (2012). Primary CLIL and its stakeholders: What children, parents and teachers think of the potential merits and pitfalls of CLIL modules in primary teaching. International CLIL Research Journal, 1 (4), 36–46. • Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage. • Mosteller, F., Light, R., & Sacher, A. (1996). Sustained inquiry in education: Lessons from skill grouping and class size. Harvard Educational Review, 66 (4), 797–842. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.4.36m328762x21610x • Navés, T. (2010, September). What makes good CLIL teaching and learning? 25th GRETA Convention: Celebrating 25 years of teacher inspiration. University of Granada. • Otwinowska, A., & Foryś, M. (2017). They learn the CLIL way, but do they like it? Affectivity and cognition in upper-primary CLIL classes. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 20 (5), 457–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2015.1051944 • Papaja, K. (2012). The impact of students’ attitude on CLIL: A study conducted in higher education. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 5 (2), 28–56. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2012.5.2.10 • Papaja, K., & Rojczyk, A. (2013). Motivation from the perspective of a CLIL teenage learner. In D. Gabrys-Barker & J. Bielska (Eds.), The affective dimension in second language acquisition (pp. 241–253). Multilingual Matters. • Paran, A. (2013). Content and language integrated learning: Panacea or policy borrowing myth? Applied Linguistics Review, 4 (2), 317–342. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2013-0014 • Pavlenko, A., & Norton, B. (2007). Imagined communities, identity, and English language learning. In J. Cummins & C. Davison (Eds.), Kluwer handbook of English language teaching (pp. 669–680). Springer. • Pérez-Cañado, M. L. (2012). CLIL research in Europe: Past, present, and future. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15 (3), 315–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2011.630064 • Phillipson, R. (2003). English-only Europe? Challenging language policy. Routledge. • Pladevall-Ballester, E. (2015). Exploring primary school CLIL perceptions in Catalonia: Students’, teachers’ and parents’ opinions and expectations. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 18 (1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2013.874972 • Relaño-Pastor, A. M. (2015). The commodification of English in “Madrid, Comunidad Bilingüe”: Insights from the CLIL classroom. Journal of Language Policy, 14 (2), 131–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-014-9338-7 • Ruiz de Zarobe, Y., & Jiménez-Catalán, R. M. (Eds.). (2009). Content and language integrated learning: Evidence from research in Europe. Multilingual Matters. • Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage. • Schmidt, R., & Watanabe, Y. (2001). Motivation, strategy use, and pedagogical preferences in foreign language learning. In Z. Dörnyei & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Motivation and language acquisition (pp. 313–359). University of Hawaii. • Seikkula-Leino, J. (2007). CLIL learning: Achievement levels and affective factors. Language and Education, 21 (4), 328–341. https://doi.org/10.2167/le635.0 • Shohamy, E. (2006). Language policy: Hidden agendas and new approaches. Routledge. • Somers, T., & Llinares, A. (2018). Students’ motivation for content and language integrated learning and the role of program intensity. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1517722 | |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 37d89b71-a6b1-41fd-8943-7218853ef94f | |
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 37d89b71-a6b1-41fd-8943-7218853ef94f |
Download
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- CLIL students' affectivity. 2020.pdf
- Size:
- 655.21 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format