Publication:
Evaluación del comportamiento clínico, radiológico e histomorfométrico de los injertos en bloque alogénicos vs autógenos: revisión sistemática y meta-análisis.

dc.contributor.advisorLeco Berrocal, María Isabel
dc.contributor.authorLaazouzi Jellouli, Ismael
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-17T10:18:40Z
dc.date.available2023-06-17T10:18:40Z
dc.date.defense2021
dc.date.issued2021
dc.descriptionTrabajo de Fin de Máster en Ciencias Odontológicas, Facultad de Odontología UCM, Departamento de Especialidades Clínicas Odontológicas, Curso 2020/2021.
dc.description.abstract1. El comportamiento clínico tanto de los autoinjertos como de los aloinjertos es similar. 2. La tasa de supervivencia de los injertos no difiere entre los diferentes tipos de injerto. 3. La reabsorción de los injertos alogénicos está influenciada, principalmente, por la microarquitectura del injerto. Los injertos corticales se reabsorben menos que los injertos esponjosos. 4. La capacidad de formación de hueso nuevo depende, por un lado, de la microarquitectura y, por otro lado, de la capacidad osteogénica del injerto. 5. La tasa de supervivencia de los implantes no difiere entre los diferentes tipos de injerto. 6. Las complicaciones más frecuentes son la exposición del injerto y la dehiscencia de la sutura, y están asociadas a una mayor probabilidad de fracaso del injerto. 7. Los resultados obtenidos en esta revisión y meta-análisis deben interpretarse con precaución debido al alto sesgo general de los estudios, periodo de seguimiento escaso de los injertos alogénicos y diferentes métodos de medición y periodos de curación. 8. Se requieren más ensayos clínicos aleatorizados con largos periodos de seguimiento que comparen las ventajas e inconvenientes de todos los tipos de bloque alogénicos y autólogos para poder sacar conclusiones definitivas.
dc.description.departmentDepto. de Especialidades Clínicas Odontológicas
dc.description.facultyFac. de Odontología
dc.description.refereedTRUE
dc.description.statusunpub
dc.eprint.idhttps://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/69608
dc.identifier.citation1. Tolstunov L, Hamrick JFE, Broumand V, Shilo D, Rachmiel A. Bone Augmentation Techniques for Horizontal and Vertical Alveolar Ridge Deficiency in Oral Implantology. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2019; 31(2):163–91. 2. Kumar P, Vinitha B, Fathima G. Bone grafts in dentistry. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2013;5: S125–S127. 3. Chiapasco M, Zaniboni M, Boisco M. Augmentation procedures for the rehabilitation of deficient edentulous ridges with oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:136–59 4. Jensen SS, Terheyden H. Bone augmentation procedures in localized defects in the alveolar ridge: clinical results with different bone grafts and bone-substitute materials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24(Suppl):218–36. 5. Pape HC, Evans A, Kobbe P. Autologous bone graft: properties and techniques. J Orthop Trauma 2010;24(Suppl 1):S36–40. 6. Giannoudis PV, Dinopoulos H, Tsiridis E. Bone substitutes: an update. Injury. 2005; 36(Suppl 3):S20–S27. 7. Saima S, Jan S, Shah A, Yousuf A, Batra M. Bone Grafts and Bone Substitutes in Dentistry. J Oral Res Rev 2016;8(1):36–38. 8. Khan SN, Cammisa FPJ, Sandhu HS, Diwan AD, Girardi FP, Lane JM. The biology of bone grafting. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2005;13(1):77–86. 9. Rodella LF, Cocchi MA, Rezzani R, et al. Fresh frozen bone in oral and maxillofacial surgery. J Dent Sci 2015;10:115–122 10. Delloye C, Cornu O, Druez V, Barbier O. Bone allografts: What they can offer and what they cannot. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89(5):574–579. 11. Wang, W.; Yeung, K.W.K. Bone grafts and biomaterials substitutes for bone defect repair: A review Bioact Mater 2017, 2, 224–247. 12. Titsinides S, Agrogiannis G, Karatzas T. Bone grafting materials in dentoalveolar reconstruction: a comprehensive review. Jpn Dent Sci Rev 2019;55:26–32. 13. Carlson E, Marx R, Buck B. The potential for HIV transmission through allogeneic bone: a review of risks and safety. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995;80:17- 23 14. Roth D, Fernandez J, Babischkin S, et al. Detection of hepatitis C virus infection among cadaver organ donors: evidence for low transmission of disease. Ann Intern Med 1992;117:470-5. 15. Kattz, J. The effects of various cleaning and sterilization processes on allograft bone incorporation. J Long-Term Eff Med Implants 2010, 20, 271–276. 16. Shibuya, N.; Jupiter, D.C. Bone graft substitute: allograft and xenograft. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 2015, 32, 21–34. 17. Nguyen H, Morgan DA, Forwood MR. Sterilization of allograft bone: is 25 kGy the gold standard for gamma irradiation? Cell Tissue Bank 2007;8(2):81e91. 18. Nguyen H, Morgan D, Forwood M. Sterilization of allograft bone: effects of gamma irradiation on allograft biology and biomechanics. Cell Tissue Banking 2007;8:93e105. 19. Ball ST, Amiel D, Bugbee WD. The effects of storage on fresh human osteochondral allografts. Clin Orthop 2004;418:246-252. 20. Boyce T, Edwards J, Scarborough N. Allograft bone. The influence of processing on safety and performance. Orthop Clin North Am 1999;30: 571– 581. 21. Gazdag AR, Lane JM, Glaser D, Forster RA. Alternatives to autogenous bone graft: efficacy and indications. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1995; 3(1):1–8. 22. Pelker RR, Friedlaender GE. Biomechanical aspects of bone autografts and allografts. Orthop Clin North Am 1987;18:235–239. 23. Wood R, Mealey B. Histologic comparison of healing after tooth extraction with ridge preservation using mineralized versus demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft. J Periodontol 2012;83(3):329-36. 24. Lafzi A, Vahabi S, Ghods S, et al. In vitro effect of mineralized and demineralized bone allografts on proliferation and differentiation of MG-63 osteoblast-like cells. Cell Tissue Bank 2016;17:91–104 25. Chavda S, Levin L. Human studies of vertical and horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation comparing different types of bone graft materials: A systematic review. J Oral Implantol 2018;44:74-84. 26. de Azambuja Carvalho PH, dos Santos Trento G, Moura LB, et al. Horizontal ridge augmentation using xenogenous bone graft- systematic review. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019;23:271–279 27. Fu JH, Wang HL. Horizontal bone augmentation: the decision tree. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2011;31:429-36 28. Ozkan Y, Ozcan M, Varol A, Akoglu B, Ucankale M, Basa S. Resonance frequency analysis assessment of implant stability in labial onlay grafted posterior mandibles: a pilot clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:235-42. 29. Pikos MA. Block autografts for localized ridge augmentation: Part II. The posterior mandible. Implant Dent 2000;9:67-75. 30. Tresguerres FGF, Tresguerres IF, Iglesias O, Leco I, Tamimi F, Torres J. The role of cortical perforations in allogeneic block grafting for lateral augmentation in maxilla: A randomized clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2021;1–13 doi: 10.1111/cid.12996. 31. Monje A, Pikos MA, Chan HL, Suarez F, Gargallo-Albiol J, Hernandez-Alfaro F, Galindo-Moreno P, Wang HL. On the feasibility of utilizing allogeneic bone blocks for atrophic maxillary augmentation. Biomed Res Int 2014:2014:814578 32. Nissan J, Ghelfan O, Mardinger O, Calderon S, Chaushu G. Efficacy of cancellous block allograft augmentation prior to implant placement in the posterior atrophic mandible. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2011;13: 279–85. 33. Novell J, Novell-Costa F, Ivorra C, Fariñas O, Munilla A, Martinez C. Five-year results of implants inserted into freeze-dried block allografts. Implant Dent 2012;21:129-35 34. Chiapasco M, Di Martino G, Anello T, Zaniboni M, Romeo E. Fresh frozen versus autogenous iliac bone for the rehabilitation of the extremely atrophic maxilla with onlay grafts and endosseous implants: preliminary results of a prospective comparative study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2013: 17: e251– e266. 35. Lumetti S, Galli C, Manfredi E, et al. Correlation between density and resorption of fresh-frozen and autogenous bone grafts. Biomed Res Int 2014;2014:1-6 36. Oppenheimer AJ, Tong L, Buchman SR. Craniofacial bone grafting: Wolff's law revisited. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 2008;1(1):49-61. 37. Whitaker LA. Biological boundaries: a concept in facial skeletal restructuring. Clin Plast Surg 1989;16:1-10. 38. Fernández-Tresguerres-Hernández-Gil I, Alobera Gracia MA, del Canto Pingarrón M, Blanco Jerez L. Physiological bases of bone regeneration I. Histology and physiology of bone tissue. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2006;11:E47-51. 39. Contar CM, Sarot JR, Costa MB, et al. Fresh-frozen bone allografts in maxillary ridge augmentation: Histologic analysis. J Oral Implantol 2011;37:223–231. 40. Nissan J, Mardinger O, Strauss M, Peleg M, Sacco R, Chaushu G. Implant- supported restoration of congenitally missing teeth using cancellous bone block- allografts. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011;111:286– 291. 41. Franco M, Viscioni A, Rigo L, Guidi R, Zollino I, Avantaggiato A, Carinci F. Clinical outcome of narrow diameter implants inserted into allografts. J Appl Oral Sci 2009;17:301-6. 42. Carinci F, Brunelli G, Franco M, et al. A retrospective study on 287 implants installed in resorbed maxillae grafted with fresh frozen allogenous bone. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2010; 12:91–98. 43. Welch V, Petticrew M, Tugwell P, Moher D, O'Neill J, Waters E, White H. PRISMA-Equity Bellagio group. PRISMA-Equity 2012 extension: reporting guidelines for systematic reviews with a focus on health equity. PLoS Med. 2012;9(10):e1001333. 44. Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2019;366:l4898 45. Munn Z, Barker TH, Moola S, Tufanaru C, Stern C, McArthur A, et al. . Methodological quality of case series studies: an introduction to the JBI critical appraisal tool. JBI Evid Synth 2020; 18:2127–2133. 46. Sterne JAC, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ 2016;355:i4919. 47. Orsini G, Stacchi C, Visintini E, Di Iorio D, Putignano A, Breschi L, et al. Clinical and histologic evaluation of fresh frozen human bone grafts for horizontal reconstruction of maxillary alveolar ridges. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2011;31:535–44. 48. Silva ER, Ferraz EP, Neto EC, Chaushu G, Chaushu L, Xavier SP. Volumetric atability of fresh frozen bone blocks in atrophic posterior mandible augmentation. J Oral Implantol 2017;43:25–32. 49. Dias RR, Sehn FP, de Santana Santos T, Silva ER, Chaushu G, Xavier SP. Corticocancellous fresh-frozen allograft bone blocks for augmenting atrophied posterior mandibles in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016, 27:39–46. 50. Barone A, Varanini P, Orlando B, Tonelli P, Covani U. Deep-frozen allogeneic onlay bone grafts for reconstruction of atrophic maxillary alveolar ridges: a preliminary study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67:1300–06. 51. Pereira E, Messias A, Dias R, et al. Horizontal resorption of freshfrozen corticocancellous bone blocks in the reconstruction of the atrophied maxilla at 5 months. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015;17:444–458. 52. Ahmadi RS, Sayar F, Rakhshan V, Iranpour B, Jahanbani J, Toumaj A, Akhoondi N. Clinical and histomorphometric assessment of lateral alveolar ridge augmentation using a corticocancellous freeze-dried allograft bone block. J Oral Implantol 2017:43(3):202-210. 53. Peleg M, Sawatari Y, Marx RN, Santoro J, Cohen J, Bejarano P, et al. Use of corticocancellous allogeneic bone blocks for augmentation of alveolar bone defects. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:153–62. 54. Nissan J, Marilena V, Gross O, Mardinger O, Chaushu G. Histomorphometric analysis following augmentation of the posterior mandible using cancellous bone-block allograft. J Biomed Mater Res A 2011;97:509–13. 55. Wallace S, Gellin R. Clinical evaluation of freeze-dried cancellous block allografts for ridge augmentation and implant placement in the maxilla. Implant Dent 2010;19:272–9 56. Nissan J, Gross O, Mardinger O, Ghelfan O, Sacco R, Chaushu G. Post- traumatic implant-supported restoration of the anterior maxillary teeth using cancellous bone block allografts. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011 Dec;69(12):e513- 8. 57. Chaushu G. Analysis of complications following augmentation with cancellous block allografts. J Periodontol 2010; 81:1759–1764. 58. Chaushu L, Chaushu G, Kolerman R, Vered M, Naishlos S, Nissan J. Anterior atrophic mandible restoration using cancellous bone block allograft. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2019;21(5):903-909. 59. Verdugo F, Simonian K, Frydman A, D’Addona A, Ponto´ n J. Long-term block graft stability in thin periodontal biotype patients: A clinical and tomographic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011; 26:325-332. 60. Sakkas A., Ioannis K., Winter K., Schramm A., Wilde F. Clinical results of autologous bone augmentation harvested from the mandibular ramus prior to implant placement. An analysis of 104 cases. GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW 2016;5:Doc21. 61. Acocella A, Bertolai R, Colafranceschi M, Sacco R. Clinical, histological and histomorphometric evaluation of the healing of mandibular ramus bone block grafts for alveolar ridge augmentation before implant placement. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2010; 38:222–30. 62. Barone A, Covani U. Maxillary alveolar ridge reconstruction with nonvascularized autogenous block bone: Clinical results. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65:2039–46. 63. Ersanli S, Arısan V, Bedeloğlu E. Evaluation of the autogenous bone block transfer for dental implant placement: Symphysal or ramus harvesting? BMC Oral Health 2016;16:4. 64. Spin-Neto R, Stavropoulos A, Coletti FL, Pereira LA, Marcantonio E, Jr, Wenzel A. Remodeling of cortical and corticocancellous fresh-frozen allogeneic block bone grafts--a radiographic and histomorphometric comparison to autologous bone grafts. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26: 747-52. 65. Spin-Neto R, Stavropoulos A, Coletti FL, Faeda RS, Pereira LA, Marcantonio E., Jr Graft incorporation and implant osseointegration following the use of autologous and fresh-frozen allogeneic block bone grafts for lateral ridge augmentation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:226–33. 66. Spin-Neto R, Stavropoulos A, Dias Pereira LA, Marcantonio E, Jr, Wenzel A. Fate of autologous and fresh-frozen allogeneic block bone grafts used for ridge augmentation. A CBCT-based analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;24:167–73. 67. Deluiz D, Santos Oliveira L, Ramôa Pires F, et al. Incorporation and remodeling of bone block allografts in the maxillary reconstruction: A randomized clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2017;19:180–194. 68. Deluiz D, Oliveira LS, Pires FR, Tinoco EM. Time-dependent changes in fresh- frozen bone block grafts: Tomographic, histologic, and histomorphometric findings. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015;17:296–306. 69. Lumetti S. Consolo U. Galli C, Multinu A, Piersanti L, Bellini, P, Manfredi E, Corinaldesi G, Zaffe D, Macaluso G.M, et al. Fresh-frozen bone blocks for horizontal ridge augmentation in the upper maxilla: 6-month outcomes of a randomized controlled trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012, 16, 116–123. 70. Tresguerres FGF, ARG C, Hernandez Vallejo G, Cabrejos-Azama J, Tamimi F, Torres J. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of allogeneic block grafts for maxillary lateral ridge augmentation: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2019;21(5):1087-1098. 71. Zhao X., Zou L., Chen Y., Tang Z. Staged horizontal bone augmentation for dental implants in aesthetic zones: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial comparing a half-columnar bone block harvested from the ramus versus a rectangular bone block from the symphysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2020;49:1326–1334. 72. Hartlev J, Norholt SE, Spin-Neto R, Kraft D, Schou S, Isidor F. Histology of augmented autogenous bone covered by a platelet-rich fibrin membrane or deproteinized bovine bone mineral and a collagen membrane: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2020;8:694–704. 73. Guyatt G, Oxman A, Akl E, Kunz R, Visit G, Brozek J, et al. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64(4):383-94. 74. Kloss FR, Offermanns V, Kloss-Brandstätter A. CEComparison of allogeneic and autogenous bone grafts for augmentation of alveolar ridge defects-A 12- month retrospective radiographic evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018 Oct 10. 75. Dellavia C, Giammattei M, Carmagnola D, Musto F, Canciani E, Chiapasco M. Iliac crest fresh-frozen allografts versus autografts in oral pre-prosthetic bone reconstructive surgery: histologic and histomorphometric study. Implant Dent 2016;25(6):731-738. 76. Carinci F, Brunelli G, Zollino I, et al. Mandibles grafted with fresh-frozen bone: An evaluation of implant outcome. Implant Dent 2009;18:86–95. 77. Ozaki W, Buchman SR. Volume maintenance of onlay bone grafts in the craniofacial skeleton: micro-architecture versus embryologic origin. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998: 102: 291–299. 78. Ozaki W, Buchman SR, Goldstein SA, Fyhrie DP. A comparative analysis of the microarchitecture of cortical membranous and cortical endochondral onlay bone grafts in the craniofacial skeleton. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;104:139-147. 79. Khoury F, Hanser T. Mandibular bone block harvesting from the retromolar region: a 10-year prospective clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2015;30(3):688–697. 80. Peñarrocha-Diago M, Aloy-Prósper A, Peñarrocha-Oltra D, Calvo-Guirado JL, Peñarrocha-Diago M. Localized lateral alveolar ridge augmentation with block bone grafts: simultaneous versus delayed implant placement: a clinical and radiographic retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013;28(3):846- 53. 81. Starch-Jensen T, Deluiz D, Tinoco EMB. Horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation with allogeneic bone block graft compared with autogenous Bone block graft: a systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Res 2020; 11(1): e1.
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/9247
dc.language.isospa
dc.master.titleMáster en Ciencias Odontológicas
dc.page.total96
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.subject.cdu616.314-089.843
dc.subject.cdu615.46
dc.subject.keywordMateriales dentales
dc.subject.keywordImplantes dentales
dc.subject.keywordCirugía bucofacial
dc.subject.ucmImplantes dentales
dc.subject.ucmCirugía bucofacial
dc.subject.ucmMateriales dentales
dc.subject.unesco3213.13 Ortodoncia-Estomatología
dc.subject.unesco3213.13 Ortodoncia-Estomatología
dc.titleEvaluación del comportamiento clínico, radiológico e histomorfométrico de los injertos en bloque alogénicos vs autógenos: revisión sistemática y meta-análisis.
dc.typemaster thesis
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAdvisorOfPublicationfe475bbf-5475-4843-92d3-147c51977f5c
relation.isAdvisorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryfe475bbf-5475-4843-92d3-147c51977f5c
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
TFM - ISMAEL LAAZOUZI JELLOULI - editado y borrado.pdf
Size:
4.58 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format