Aviso: para depositar documentos, por favor, inicia sesión e identifícate con tu cuenta de correo institucional de la UCM con el botón MI CUENTA UCM. No emplees la opción AUTENTICACIÓN CON CONTRASEÑA
 

Cosmovisión, estrategia y métodos de investigación: opciones teórico-metodológicas en las tesis de maestría del PGCIN-UFSC

Simple item page
dc.book.titleDesafíos y oportunidades de las Ciencias de la Información y la Documentación en la era digital: actas del VII Encuentro Ibérico EDICIC 2015 (Madrid, 16 y 17 de noviembre de 2015)
dc.contributor.authorKern, Vinícius M.
dc.contributor.authorAndrade, Wmylinn G. F.
dc.contributor.authorGarcía, Paula Balbis
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-18T07:15:08Z
dc.date.available2023-06-18T07:15:08Z
dc.date.issued2015-11-17
dc.description.abstractLa ciencia de la información es interdisciplinaria y multiparadigmática. ¿Cómo se distribuyen las opciones teóricas y metodológicas en el área? Hicimos un estudio piloto en una muestra aleatoria de 15 de las 112 tesis de maestría defendidas en el Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Informação (PGCIN) de la Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) desde la primera defensa en 2005 hasta 2014. Cada tesis fue clasificada por cosmovisión según Creswell: postpositivismo, constructivismo social, abordaje transformativo-participativo o pragmatismo. Fue considerado el nexo entre cosmovisión, estrategia amplia y técnicas e instrumentos de investigación, por eso también cada tesis fue clasificada como cuantitativa, cualitativa o mixta y registrado(s) su(s) técnica(s) e instrumento(s) utilizados. Resultaron 8 tesis clasificadas como cuantitativas-postpositivistas, 3 cualitativas (2 constructivistas y 1 transformativa) y 4 de estrategia mixta y cosmovisión pragmática. El resultado, aunque sin representatividad estadística, expresa diversidad epistemológica (además, ontológica) y metodológica compatible con la diversidad característica del área de la ciencia de la información.
dc.description.abstractInformation science is interdisciplinary and multiparadigmatic. What is the distribution of theoretical and methodological choices in the area? We did a pilot study in a random sample of 15 of 112 master's theses defended in the Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Informação (PGCIN) of the Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) from the first defense in 2005 until 2014. Each thesis was classified by worldview according Creswell: postpositivism, social constructivism, advocacy-participatory approach, or pragmatism. We took into account the nexus among worldview, general research strategy and techniques and instruments of investigation. For that reason, each thesis was also classified as quantitative, qualitative, or mixed and its research techniques and instruments were registered. The results indicate 8 theses as quantitative and post-positivist, 3 qualitative (2 constructivist and 1 advocacy-participatory), and 4 pragmatic with mixed research strategy. The results, though not statistically representative, expressed epistemological (also ontological) and methodological diversity, compatible with the characteristic diversity of the area of information science.
dc.description.facultyFac. de Ciencias de la Documentación
dc.description.refereedTRUE
dc.description.statuspub
dc.eprint.idhttps://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/34751
dc.identifier.isbn978-84-608-3330-7
dc.identifier.officialurlhttp://edicic2015.org.es/
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/24859
dc.language.isospa
dc.page.total11
dc.publication.placeMadrid
dc.publisherUniversidad Complutense de Madrid
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.subject.cdu002
dc.subject.keywordDiseño de la investigación
dc.subject.keywordEpistemología
dc.subject.keywordCiencia de la Información
dc.subject.keywordTeorías en la Ciencia de la Información
dc.subject.keywordMetodología de investigación
dc.subject.keywordPosgrado.
dc.subject.keywordResearch design
dc.subject.keywordEpistemology
dc.subject.keywordInformation Science
dc.subject.keywordTheory in Information Science
dc.subject.keywordResearch methodology
dc.subject.keywordGraduate studies.
dc.subject.ucmDocumentación
dc.subject.ucmTeoría de la información
dc.subject.unesco5701.06 Documentación
dc.subject.unesco5910.01 Información
dc.titleCosmovisión, estrategia y métodos de investigación: opciones teórico-metodológicas en las tesis de maestría del PGCIN-UFSC
dc.typebook part
dcterms.referencesAlise, M. A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). A continuation of the paradigm wars? Prevalence rates of methodological approaches across the social/behavioral sciences. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(2), 103-126. Araújo, C. A. Á. (2009). Correntes teóricas da ciência da informação. Ciência da Informação, 38(3), 192-204. Åsberg, R., Hummerdal, D., & Dekker, S. (2011). There are no qualitative methods–nor quantitative for that matter: the misleading rhetoric of the qualitative–quantitative argument. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 12(5), 408-415. Borko, H. (1968). Information science: what is it? American documentation, 19(1), 3-5. Buckland, M. (1991). Information as thing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42, 351-360. Buckland, M. (2012). What kind of science can information science be? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(1), 1-7. Bunge, M. (1979). Treatise on basic philosophy: Ontology II: A world of systems (vol. 4). Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel. Bunge, M. (1990). Wand and Weber on information systems. In P. Weingartner & G.J.W. Dorn (Eds.), Studies on Mario Bunge’s Treatise (pp. 593-595). Amsterdam: Rodopi. Bunge, M. (2003). Emergence and convergence: Qualitative novelty and the unity of knowledge. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press. Bunge, M. (2005). Diccionario de filosofía. Tercera ed. en español. Ciudad de México: Siglo xxi. Bush, V. (1945). As we may think. The Atlantic Monthly, 176(1), 101-108. Capurro, R. (2003). Epistemologia e Ciência da Informação. In Anais Eletrônicos do V Encontro Nacional de Pesquisa em Ciência da Informação. Belo Horizonte: ANCIB e ECI/UFMG. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 3rd ed. Sage Publications. Dubé, L., & Paré, G. (2003). Rigor in information systems positivist case research: current practices, trends, and recommendations. MIS Quarterly, 597-636. Fidel, R. (2008). Are we there yet? Mixed methods research in library and information science. Library & Information Science Research, 30(4), 265-272. Freire, I. M. (2008). Um olhar sobre a produção científica brasileira na temática epistemologia da ciência da informação. Tendências da Pesquisa Brasileira em Ciência da Informação, 1(1). Hjørland, B. (2002). Epistemology and the socio‐cognitive perspective in information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(4), 257-270. Hjørland, B. (2014). Information science and its core concepts: Levels of disagreement. In F. Ibekwe-SanJuan & T. M. Dousa (Eds.) Theories of information, communication and knowledge: A multidisciplinary approach (pp. 205-235). Springer Netherlands. Hjørland, B. and Albrechtsen, H. (1995). Toward a new horizon in information science: domain-analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(6), 400-425. Holland, G. A. (2008). Information science: an interdisciplinary effort? Journal of Documentation, 64(1), 7-23. Kilov, H., & Sack, I. (2009). Mechanisms for communication between business and IT experts. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 31(1), 98-109. Le Coadic, Y. F. (1996). A ciência da informação. Briquet de lemos Livros. Ritzer, G. (1975). Sociology: A multiple paradigm science. The American Sociologist, 156-167. Ruyer, R. (1954). La cybernétique et l'origine de l'information. Paris: Flammarion. Saracevic, T. (1995). Interdisciplinary nature of information science. Ciência da informação, 24(1), 36-41. Saracevic, T. (1996). Ciência da informação: origem, evolução e relações. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, 1(1), 41-62. Shera, J. H., & Cleveland, D. B. (1977). History and foundations of information science. Annual review of information science and technology, 12, 249-275. Silva, A. C. P. O., Pizarro, D. C., Inomata, D. O., Garcez, E. F., & Menezes, P. L. (2014a). Estudos e ações em informação e educação - 2013. Encontros Bibli, 19(39), 269-300. Silva, C., Ferreira, I., Ramos, I., & Amaral, L. (2014b). Interpretative research in information systems: Two qualitative research design projects. In Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management Studies: ECRM 2014 (p. 337). Academic Conferences Limited. Triviños, A. N. S. (1987). Introdução à pesquisa em ciências sociais: a pesquisa qualitativa em educação. Atlas. Vega-Almeida, R. L., Fernández-Molina, J. C., & Linares, R. (2009). Coordenadas paradigmáticas, históricas y epistemológicas de la Ciencia de la Información: una sistematización. Information Research, 14(2), paper 399. Zandonade, T. (2004). Social epistemology from Jesse Shera to Steve Fuller. Library Trends, 52(4), 810–832. Ziman, J. (2000). Real science: What it is and what it means. Cambridge University Press.
dspace.entity.typePublication

Download

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
X-8-Vinicius_Cosmovision-tesis-maestria.pdf
Size:
326.75 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
downoload Download

Collections

Secciones de libros