Comparative assessment of Goods and services provided by grazing regulation and reforestation in degraded mediterranean mangelands

dc.contributor.authorPapanastasis, Vasilios
dc.contributor.authorBautista, Susana
dc.contributor.authorChouvardas, Dimitrios
dc.contributor.authorMantzanas, Konstantinos
dc.contributor.authorPapadimitriou, Maria
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Mayor, Ángeles Pilar
dc.contributor.authorKoukioumi, Polina
dc.contributor.authorPapaioannou, Athanasios
dc.contributor.authorVallejo, Ramon
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-07T09:38:49Z
dc.date.available2024-02-07T09:38:49Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractSeveral management actions are applied to restore ecosystem services in degraded Mediterranean rangelands, which range from adjusting the grazing pressure to the removal of grazers and pine plantations. Four such actions were assessed in Quercus coccifera L. shrublands in northern Greece: (i) moderate grazing by goats and sheep; (ii) no grazing; (iii) no grazing plus pine (Pinus pinaster Aiton) plantation in forest gaps (gap reforestation); and (iv) no grazing plus full reforestation of shrubland areas, also with P. pinaster. In addition, heavy grazing was also assessed to serve as a control action. We comparatively assessed the impact of these actions on key provisioning, regulating and supporting ecosystem services by using ground-based indicators. Depending on the ecosystem service considered, the management actions were ranked differently. However, the overall provision of services was particularly favoured under moderate and no grazing management options, with moderate grazing outranking any other action in provisioning services and the no grazing action presenting the most balanced provision of services. Pine reforestations largely contributed to water and soil conservation and C sequestration but had a negative impact on plant diversity when implemented at the expense of removing natural vegetation in the area. Heavy grazing had the lowest provision of ecosystem services. It is concluded that degraded rangelands can be restored by moderating the grazing pressure rather than completely banning livestock grazing or converting them into pine plantations.
dc.description.departmentDepto. de Biodiversidad, Ecología y Evolución
dc.description.facultyFac. de Ciencias Biológicas
dc.description.refereedTRUE
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Commission
dc.description.sponsorshipMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad (España)
dc.description.sponsorshipMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (España)
dc.description.statuspub
dc.identifier.citationPapanastasis, Vasilios P., et al. «Comparative Assessment of Goods and Services Provided by Grazing Regulation and Reforestation in Degraded Mediterranean Rangelands». Land Degradation & Development, vol. 28, n.o 4, mayo de 2017, pp. 1178-87. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2368.
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ldr.2368
dc.identifier.essn1099-145X
dc.identifier.issn1085-3278
dc.identifier.officialurlhttps://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2368
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/99826
dc.issue.number4
dc.journal.titleLand Degradation and Development
dc.language.isoeng
dc.page.final1187
dc.page.initial1178
dc.publisherWiley
dc.rights.accessRightsrestricted access
dc.subject.keywordCarbon sequestration
dc.subject.keywordEcosystem services
dc.subject.keywordForage
dc.subject.keywordGrazing management
dc.subject.keywordLandscape functional analysis
dc.subject.keywordPlant diversity
dc.subject.keywordRestoration actions
dc.subject.keywordSoilfunctions
dc.subject.ucmBiología
dc.subject.unesco24 Ciencias de la Vida
dc.titleComparative assessment of Goods and services provided by grazing regulation and reforestation in degraded mediterranean mangelands
dc.typejournal article
dc.volume.number28
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication2548da49-358e-4555-b413-dec6bae3af5d
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery2548da49-358e-4555-b413-dec6bae3af5d

Download

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Services_provided_by_grazing_regulation.pdf
Size:
1.29 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections