Antropología y fenomenología en Nicolás Gómez Dávila
Loading...
Full text at PDC
Publication date
2020
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Pontificia Comillas
Citation
Torregroza Lara, Enver Joel (2020). Antropología y fenomenología en Nicolás Gómez Dávila. Pensamiento: Revista de información e investigación filosófica. 76 (291), pp.1153-1171. https://doi.org/10.14422/pen.v76.i291.y2020.017
Abstract
El propósito del artículo es ofrecer una aproximación a la filosofía del pensador bogotano Nicolás Gómez Dávila a partir de una interpretación de su libro Textos I, publicado en 1959. En el artí- culo se defiende que los diez ensayos aparentemente dispersos de Textos I se articulan temáticamente en torno a los grandes problemas de la antropología filosófica, y metódicamente, pueden ser descritos como ejercicios fenomenológicos. Se propone para ello una hermenéutica filosófica que distingue diferentes momentos de pensamiento en la obra del filósofo colombiano y que toma distancia de la pretensión de encontrar un sistema total de pensamiento en una obra intencionalmente fragmentaria.
The article aims to show a new interpretation of Nicolás Gómez Dávila’s philosophy by analyzing his early work Textos I. The article demonstrates that the ten essays of this book, apparently dispersed, are connected thematically around the big questions of philosophical anthropology. Methodologically, they also can be described as phenomenological exercises. Must be put forward a philosophical hermeneutic of Dávila’s work attending different moments of his philosophy and rejecting the will to find a total system of thinking in a fragmented work.
The article aims to show a new interpretation of Nicolás Gómez Dávila’s philosophy by analyzing his early work Textos I. The article demonstrates that the ten essays of this book, apparently dispersed, are connected thematically around the big questions of philosophical anthropology. Methodologically, they also can be described as phenomenological exercises. Must be put forward a philosophical hermeneutic of Dávila’s work attending different moments of his philosophy and rejecting the will to find a total system of thinking in a fragmented work.