Owl-like plaques of the Copper Age and the involvement of children
dc.contributor.author | Negro, Juan José | |
dc.contributor.author | Blanco, Guillermo | |
dc.contributor.author | Rodríguez-Rodríguez, Eduardo | |
dc.contributor.author | Díaz Núñez de Arenas, Víctor M. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-06-22T12:34:08Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-06-22T12:34:08Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-12-01 | |
dc.description.abstract | In the Copper Age, slate engraved plaques were produced massively in the southwestern corner of the Iberian Peninsula. Researchers have speculated about the function of these palm-sized stone objects for more than a century, although most have favored the idea that they represented goddesses, and served ritual purposes. The plaques are engraved with different designs of varying complexity. In some of them, the ones sporting two large frontal eyes, we clearly see owls modelled after two species present in the area: the little owl ( Athene noctua ), and the long-eared owl ( Asio otus ). These two species, living in semi-open habitats, were possibly the most abundant owls around the human settlements and surrounding cultivated fields of the Chalcolithic period. People must have been aware of the owl presence and possibly interacted with them. Why owls but no other animals have been the models may relate to the fact they are the most anthropomorphic of all animals, with large frontally-placed eyes in their enormous heads. In the iconography, owls are systematically represented, even today, with their two eyes staring at the observer, as opposed to the lateral view used for any other animal. Additionally, slate is one of the commonest surface rocks in southwestern Iberia, and it provides a blank canvas for engraving lines using pointed tools made of flint, quartz or copper. The way slates exfoliate makes easy to craft owl-looking plaques. To silhouette animals other than owls in a recognizable way would request extra carving abilities and specific tools. Plaque manufacture and design were simple and did not demand high skills nor intensive labor as demonstrated in replication experiments. Owl engravings could have been executed by youngsters, as they resemble owls painted today by elementary school students. This also suggests that schematic drawings are universal and timeless. We propose that the owl-like slate plaques are the remains of a set of objects used in both playful activities and in ritual ceremonies. The actual engraving of the plaques may have been part of the game. Owlish slate plaques were often perforated twice at the top. We interpret this as insertion points for actual bird feathers added to the plaques, right at the place where tufts emerge in live owls. The frontier among play and ritual is diffuse in liminal societies and there is no contradiction in playing with animal-like toys and, at some point, using them as offerings as part of community rituals related, for instance, to the colossal megalithic tombs so characteristic of the Copper Age. | |
dc.description.department | Depto. de Historia del Arte | |
dc.description.faculty | Fac. de Geografía e Historia | |
dc.description.refereed | TRUE | |
dc.description.status | pub | |
dc.eprint.id | https://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/76223 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1038/s41598-022-23530-0 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2045-2322 | |
dc.identifier.officialurl | https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-23530-0 | |
dc.identifier.relatedurl | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23530-0 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/72847 | |
dc.issue.number | 1 | |
dc.journal.title | Scientific reports | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | Nature publishing group | |
dc.rights | Atribución-NoComercial 3.0 España | |
dc.rights.accessRights | open access | |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/es/ | |
dc.subject.cdu | 903"636" | |
dc.subject.keyword | Edad del cobre | |
dc.subject.keyword | búho | |
dc.subject.keyword | Copper age | |
dc.subject.keyword | owl | |
dc.subject.ucm | Antropología (Psicología) | |
dc.subject.ucm | Biología | |
dc.subject.ucm | Aves | |
dc.subject.ucm | Arqueología | |
dc.subject.ucm | Prehistoria | |
dc.subject.ucm | Historia del Arte | |
dc.subject.unesco | 2402.07 Antropología Medica | |
dc.subject.unesco | 24 Ciencias de la Vida | |
dc.subject.unesco | 2401.20 Ornitología | |
dc.subject.unesco | 5505.01 Arqueología | |
dc.subject.unesco | 5504.05 Prehistoria | |
dc.subject.unesco | 5506.02 Historia del Arte | |
dc.title | Owl-like plaques of the Copper Age and the involvement of children | |
dc.type | journal article | |
dc.type.hasVersion | VoR | |
dc.volume.number | 12 | |
dcterms.references | 1. GarcíaRivero,D.&O’Brien,M.J.PhylogeneticanalysisshowsthatNeolithicslateplaquesfromthesouthwesternIberianPeninsula are not genealogical recording systems. PLoS ONE 9(2), e882961. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088296 (2014). 2. Lillios,K.T.HeraldryfortheDead:Memory,Identity,andtheEngravedStonePlaquesofNeolithicIberia(UniversityofTexasPress, 2008). 3. omas,J.T.,Gonçalves,V.S.&Andrade,M.A.ExperimentalproductionoftheLateNeolithic/EarlyChalcolithicengravedschist plaques of Southwestern Iberia: An approach to techniques and tools. Rev. Port. Arqueol. 24, 15–39 (2021). 4. García Rivero, D. e evolution of anthropomorphism in the neolithic engraved plaques of Southwestern Iberian Peninsula: A systematic approach from phylogenetics. Archaeol. Anthropol. Sci. 9, 1689–1714 (2017). 5. Morgan,J.Recherchessurlesoriginesdel’Egypte(E.Leroux,1897). 6. Cárdenes, V., Ponce de León, M., Rodríguez, X. A. & Rubio-Ordoñez, A. Roo ng slate industry in Spain: History, geology, and geoheritage. Geoheritage 11, 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-017-0263-y (2019). 7. Vasconcelos,J.L.ReligiõesdaLusitâniaVol.1(ImprensaNacional,1897). 8. Correia,V.Artepré-histórico:osídolosplacas.TerraPortuguesa12,29–35(1917). 9. Gimbutas,M. eGoddessesandGodsofOldEurope(UniversityofCaliforniaPress,1974). 10. Gimbutas,M. eCivilizationoftheGoddess eWorldofOldEurope(HarperSanFrancisco,1991). 11. Frankowski,E.EstelasDiscoideasdelaPenínsulaIbérica(MuseoNacionaldeCienciasNaturales,1920). 12. Caubet,A.(ed.)Idols. ePowerofImages(SkiraEditore,2018). 13. BuenoRamírez,P.&SolerDíaz,J.(eds)Ídolos.MiradasMilenarias(ComunidaddeMadrid,2020). 14. Langley,M.C.&Litster,M.Isitritual?Orisitchildren?Distinguishingconsequencesofplayfromritualactionsintheprehistoric archaeological record. Curr. Anthropol. 59(5), 616–643. https://doi.org/10.1086/699837 (2018). 15. Renfrew,C.Introduction:Playastheprecursorofritualinearlyhumansocieties.InRitual,PlayandBeliefinEvolutionandEarly Human Societies (eds Renfrew, C. et al.) 9–19 (Cambirdge University Press, 2018). 16. Crown,P.L.LearningtomakepotteryinthePrehispanicAmericanSouthwest.J.Anthropol.Res.57,451–469(2001). 17. Crown,P.L.Lifehistoriesofpotsandpotters:Situatingtheindividualinarchaeology.Am.Antiq.72,677–690(2007). 18. Maicas,R.Alookintothepast:IdolsoftheIberianPeninsula.InIdols. ePowerofImages(ed.Caubet,A.)69–81(SkiraEditore, 2018). 19. Kamp,K.A.Wherehaveallthechildrengone? earchaeologyofchildhood.J.Archaeol.8(1),1–34(2001). 20. Lbova,L. eSiberianPaleolithicsiteofMal’ta:Auniquesourceforthestudyofchildhoodarchaeology.Evol.Hum.Sci.3(2021). 21. Polyakov,A.V.&Esin,Y.N.Horn gurinesfromanOkunevburialonLakeItkul,Khakassia,southernSiberia.Archaeol.Ethnol. Anthropol. Eurasia 43(2), 43–57 (2015). 22. Crown, P. L. Learning about learning. In Archaeological Anthropology (eds Skibo, J. et al.) 198–217 (University of Arizona Press, 2007). 23. Morris,D.Owl(ReaktionBooksLtd.,2009). 24. Svensson,L.,Grant,P.J.,Mullarney,K.&Zetterstrom,D.CollinsBirdGuide: eMostCompleteFieldGuidetotheBirdsofBritain and Europe (Harper Collins Publishers Ltd., 1999). 25. Negro,J.J.,Figueroa-Luque,E.&Galván,I.Melanin-basedsexualdichromatismintheWesternPalearcticavifaunaimpliesdarker males and lighter females. J. Avian Biol. 49, 1–8 (2018). 26. Horváth, M. B., Martínez-Cruz, B., Negro, J. J., Kalmár, L. & Godoy, J. A. An overlooked DNA source for non-invasive genetic analysis in birds. J. Avian Biol. 36(1), 84–88 (2005). 27. Lillios,K.T. eEngravedStonePlaqueRegistryandInquiryTool(ESPRIT)http://research2.its.uiowa.edu/iberian(2004). 28. Blanco,G.,Sánchez-Marco,A.&Negro,J.J.Nightcaptureofroostingcavebirdsbyneanderthals:Anactualisticapproach.Front. Ecol. Evol. 9, 9 (2021). 29. Leighton, G. R., Hugo, P. S., Roulin, A. & Amar, A. Just Google it: Assessing the use of Google images to describe geographical variation in visible traits of organisms. Methods. Ecol. Evol. 7, 1060–1070. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12562 (2016). 30. CharleyHarperStudiohttps://www.charleyharperartstudio.com/catalogsearch/result/?q=owl(accessed29/June/2022). 31. Gonçalves, V. S. Alguns casos de placas de xisto gravadas excepcionais do Sul de Portugal: Anta do Curral da Antinha, Anta Grande da Comenda da Igreja, Anta do Zambujo, Gruta arti cial Alapraia 2. In 5.o Congresso do Neolítico Peninsular. Actas (eds. Gonçalves, V. S., Diniz, M & Sousa, A.C.) 662–676 (UNIARQ, Lisboa, 2011). 32. Pirovano, A., Rubolini, D., Brambrilla, S. & Ferrari, N. Winter diet of urban roosting long-eared owls (Asio otus) in northern Italy: e importance of the brown rat (Rattus norvegicus). Bird Study 47, 242–244 (2000). 33. GarcíaSanjuán,L.,Fernández-Flores,A.&Díaz-ZoritaBonilla,M.Montelirio.Valoracióneinterpretacióndeunatumbaexcep- cional. In Montelirio. Un gran monumento megalítico de la Edad del Cobre, (eds Fernández-Flores, A. et al.) 503–553 (Junta de Andalucía, Consejería de Cultura, 2016). 34. omas,J.T.,McCall,G.&Lillios,K.Revisitingtheindividualinprehistory:idiosyncraticengravingvariationandtheNeolithic slate plaques of the Iberian peninsula. Camb. Archael. J. 19, 53–72 (2009). 35. Ruiz,J.F.etal.CalciumoxalateAMS14Cdatingandchronologyofpost-PaleolithicrockpaintingsintheIberianPeninsula:Two dates from Abrigo de los Oculados (Henarejos, Cuenca, Spain). J. Archaeol. Sci. 39, 2655–2667 (2012). 36. Weinstein,K. eOwlinArt,MythandLegend(CrescentBooks,1985). 37. Cocker,M.&Tipling,D.Birds&People(JonathanCape,2013). 38. Lišková, S. & Frynta, D. What determines bird beauty in human eyes?. Anthrozoös 26(1), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.2752/17530 3713X13534238631399 (2013). 39. GarcíaSanjuán,L.,LuciañezTriviño,M.,Schuhmacher,T.X.,Wheatley,D.&Bane,A.Ivorycra smanship,tradeandsocialsig- ni cance in the southern Iberian copper age: e evidence from the pp4-montelirio sector of Valencina de la Concepción (Seville, Spain). Eur. J. Archaeol. 16(4), 610–635 (2013). 40. Maicas,R.Unossonmásigualesqueotros.LosídolosenlaColecciónSiret.InÍdolos.MiradasMilenarias,(eds.BuenoRamírez, P. & Soler Díaz, J.) 289–302 (Museo Arqueológico de Alicante, 2020). 41. Wendrich, W., Archaeology and apprenticeship: Body knowledge, identity, and Communities of Practice. In Archaeology and Apprenticeship: Body Knowledge, Identity, and Communities of practice (Wendrich, W. ed.) 1–19 (University of Arizona Press, Tucson, 2012). 42. Finlayson, C. et al. Birds of a feather: Neanderthal exploitation of raptors and corvids. PLoS ONE 7, e45927. https://doi.org/10. 1371/journal.pone.0045927 (2012). 43. Negro, J. J., Blasco, R., Rosell, J. & Finlayson, C. Potential exploitation of avian resources by fossil hominins: An overview from ethnographic and historical data. Quat. Int. 421, 6–11 (2016). 44. Negro,J.J.Raptorsandpeople:Anancientrelationshippersistingtoday.InBirdsofPrey(edsSarasola,J.H.etal.)161–176(Springer, 2018). 45. Lew-Levy,S.,Andersen,M.M.,Noa,L.&Riede,F.Hunter-gathererchildren’sobjectplayandtooluse:Anethnohistoricalanalysis. Front. Psychol. 13, 824983. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.824983 (2022). 46. Eastham,A.Magdaleniansandsnowyowls:BonesrecoveredattheGrottedeBourrouilla,Arancou(PyrénéesAtlantiques).Paleo 10, 95–108 (1998). 47. Stépano ,C.Shamanicritualandancientcircumpolarmigrations. espreadofthedarktenttraditionthroughNorthAsiaand North America. Curr. Anthropol. 62, 239–246. https://doi.org/10.1086/713536 (2021). 48. Negro,J.J.,Prenda,J.,Ferrero,J.J.,Rodríguez,A.&Reig-Ferrer,A.Atimelinefortheurbanizationofwildbirds: ecaseofthe lesser kestrel. Quat. Sci. Rev. 249, 106638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2020.106638 (2020). 49. Bernáldez, E., García, E., Gamero, M., Amores, F. & Ocaña, A. Knucklebones and other animal deposits in the “Cruz del Negro” necropolis: Possible phoenician funerary rituals in SW Spain. Anthropozoologica 48(2), 323–340 (2013). 50. Ottoni,C.etal. epalaeogeneticsofcatdispersalintheancientworld.Nat.Ecol.Evol.1(7),0139.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559- 017-0139 (2017). 51. Prummel, W. & Drenth, E. Two tureen-amphorae of the TRB West Group decorated with the caput femoris of a long-eared owl (Asio otus). In Birds in Archaeology. Proceedings of the 6th Meeting of the ICAZ Bird Working Group in Groningen (eds Prummel, W. et al.) 197–201 (Barkhuis Publisher & Groningen University Library, 2010). 52. Renfrew,C.etal.(eds)Ritual,PlayandBeliefinEvolutionandEarlyHumanSocieties(CambridgeUniversityPress,2018). 53. Dissanayake, E. From play and ritualisation to ritual and its arts: Sources of Upper Pleistocene ritual practices in Lower Middle Pleistocene ritualised and play behaviours in ancestral hominins. In Ritual, Play and Belief in Evolution and Early Human Societies (eds Renfrew, C. et al.) 87–98 (Cambridge University Press, 2018). 54. Malafouris,L.Playandritual:Somethoughtsfromamaterial-cultureperspective.InRitual,PlayandBeliefinEvolutionandEarly Human Societies (eds Renfrew, C. et al.) 311–315 (Cambirdge University Press, 2018). 55. Riede,F.,Walsh,M.J.,Nowell,A.,Langley,M.C.&Johannsen,N.N.Childrenandinnovation:Play,playobjectsandobjectplay in cultural evolution. Evol. Hum. Sci. 3, e11. https://doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2021.7 (2021). 56. Negro, J. J., Bustamante, J., Milward, J. & Bird, D. M. Captive edgling American Kestrels prefer to play with objects resembling natural prey. Anim. Behav. 52, 707–714 (1996). 57. Osborne,R.Believinginplayandritual.InRitual,PlayandBeliefinEvolutionandEarlyHumanSocieties(edsRenfrew,C.etal.) 316–320 (Cambridge University Press, 2018). 58. Burghardt, G. M. e origins, evolution and interconnections of play and ritual: Setting the stage. In Ritual, Play and Belief in Evolution and Early Human Societies (eds Renfrew, C. et al.) 23–39 (Cambridge University Press, 2018). 59. Morley, I. Pretend-play, cognition and life history in human evolution. In Ritual, Play and Belief in Evolution and Early Human Societies (eds Renfrew, C. et al.) 66–86 (Cambridge University Press, 2018). 60. Smith,P.Pretendandsocio-dramaticplayinevolutionaryanddevelopmentalperspective.InRitual,PlayandBeliefinEvolution and Early Human Societies (eds Renfrew, C. et al.) 53–65 (Cambridge University Press, 2018). 61. Dissanayake,E.WhatisArtfor?(UniversityofWashingtonPress,2002). 62. Miller,H.M.-L.Typesoflearninginapprenticeship.InArchaeologyandApprenticeship:BodyKnowledge,Identity,andCommunities of practice (ed. Wendrich, W.) 224–239 (University of Arizona Press, 2012). 63. Gell,A.ArtandAgency:AnAnthropological eory(ClarendonPress,1998). 64. BuenoRamírez,P.,deBalbínBehrmann,R.,BarrosoBermejo,R.,CarreraRamírez,F.&HuntOrtiz,M.A.Elarteylaplásticaen el tholos de Montelirio. In Montelirio. Un gran monumento megalítico de la Edad del Cobre (eds Fernandez Flores, F. et al.) 365–405 (Junta de Andalucía, Consejería de Cultura, 2016). 65. IUCN. eIUCNRedListof reatenedSpecies.Version2021–3.https://www.iucnredlist.org(2021;accessed5/July/2022)]. | |
dspace.entity.type | Publication |
Download
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1