Aviso: para depositar documentos, por favor, inicia sesión e identifícate con tu cuenta de correo institucional de la UCM con el botón MI CUENTA UCM. No emplees la opción AUTENTICACIÓN CON CONTRASEÑA
 

Analysis of sealing vs tensile bond strength of eight adheisve restorative material systems

dc.contributor.authorDel-Nero Beneitez, María Olga
dc.contributor.authorEscribano, Nuria Isabel
dc.contributor.authorMacorra García, José Carlos De La
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-20T20:29:24Z
dc.date.available2023-06-20T20:29:24Z
dc.date.issued2000
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Using a simulated perfusion system, the intent was to determine: 1) the sealing ability of eight restorative materials (five composite resins and three compomers) used together with their corresponding dentin bonding systems, 2) their tensile bond strength, and 3) the correlation (if any) between both parameters. Materials and Methods: Permeability in crown segments from sound human third molars (n = 140) subjected to simulated perfusion (32 cm of distilled water) was measured before and after restoring with each material, and the percentage of decrease in permeability ((PPD) was recorded. Specimens were tater subjected to tensile tests to determine the tensile bond strength (TBS) of the interface. Finally, parameters were analyzed for correlation. Results: For the eight adhesive systems, the percentage of reduction in permeability was relatively hlgh [mean in %, (SD)]: F2000 93.6 (5.7),S B188.6 (11.31,S SC 86.0 (5.7), PB20 81.1 (15.9)C,O M 77.5 (10.8), OPTS 75.3 (20.6)D,Y R 73.7 (12.7)S,S PR 65.5 (19.8)T.B S values were relatively low [mean (SD)], in MPa: F2000 1.8 (0.71, SB1 4.9 (1.4)S,S C 2.6 (1.4), PB20 4.3 (1.21,C OM 2.4 {1.1),O PTS 4.5 (1.7)D,Y R L6 (0.6), SSPR.4.2 (1.5). We could not demonstrate any statistically significant correlation between both parameters for these results (maximum significance [F20001: r = 0.39, p = 0.206). Conclusion: No material completely ceased to filtrate through the interface. The low TBS values were probably due to the large size of adhesive areas. No significant correlation was found between PPD and TBS for the materials tested. There was a statistically significant relationship (r2 = 0.063, p = 0.018) between TBS and TEA (total bonded area), described by the equation TBS = 5.9 - 0.03'TBA.en
dc.description.departmentDepto. de Odontología Conservadora y Prótesis
dc.description.facultyFac. de Odontología
dc.description.refereedTRUE
dc.description.statuspub
dc.eprint.idhttps://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/5006
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/60351
dc.journal.titleJournal of Adhesive Dentistry
dc.language.isospa
dc.page.final127
dc.page.initial117
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.subject.keywordDentin
dc.subject.keywordSealing
dc.subject.keywordPerfusion
dc.subject.ucmMateriales dentales
dc.subject.unesco3213.13 Ortodoncia-Estomatología
dc.titleAnalysis of sealing vs tensile bond strength of eight adheisve restorative material systemsen
dc.typejournal article
dc.volume.number2
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication0b38ba8d-c9aa-404d-8ec6-b8c2d6a78884
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery0b38ba8d-c9aa-404d-8ec6-b8c2d6a78884

Download

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Analysis_of_sealing_vs_tensile_bond_strength_of_eight_adheisve_restorative_material_systems.pdf
Size:
2.65 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections