Ru(II)-phthalocyanine sensitized solar cells: the influence of co-adsorbents upon interfacial electron transfer kinetics

dc.contributor.authorMorandeira Ramírez, Ana
dc.contributor.authorLópez Duarte, Ismael
dc.contributor.authorO'Regan, Brian
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Díaz, María Victoria
dc.contributor.authorForneli Rubio, María Amparo
dc.contributor.authorPalomares Gil, Emilio
dc.contributor.authorTorres Cebada, Tomás
dc.contributor.authorDurrant, James Robert
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-07T16:46:11Z
dc.date.available2024-02-07T16:46:11Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.description.abstractThe development of efficient red sensitizer dyes is essential for the optimization of dye-sensitized photoelectrochemical solar cells. Ru-phthalocyanines are good candidates because they show high absorbance in the red while their axial ligands hinder the formation of aggregates, a recurrent problem among phthalocyanine dyes. In this paper, we present the photophysics and photovoltaic device performance for a series of novel Ru-phthalocyanines. We focus in particular upon the origin of the enhancement in device performance observed in the presence of two additives, Li+ and chenodeoxycholic acid. The addition of Li+ lowers the conduction band edge of the TiO2 semiconductor leading to a higher electron injection yield and a higher photocurrent in the device. The increases in injection yield and photocurrent are large for these sensitizers, compared to the widely studied ruthenium bipyridyl dye N719, due to the relatively slow injection dynamics, emphasizing the importance of injection yield in limiting device performance for this Ru-phthalocyanine dye series. Of particular interest is the effect of chenodeoxycholic acid. This coadsorbent dramatically enhances the photocurrent of the studied devices without lowering the photovoltage. Unlike previous studies, in this case the photocurrent rise can not be attributed to an increment in the electron injection yield due to the effect of the coadsorbent hindering the formation of dye aggregates. Photophysical measurements instead show that the slower recombination of dye cations with the TiO2 electrons and faster regeneration of the dye cations by the electrolyte are the reasons for the enhanced photocurrent.en
dc.description.departmentDepto. de Química en Ciencias Farmacéuticas
dc.description.facultyFac. de Farmacia
dc.description.refereedTRUE
dc.description.statuspub
dc.identifier.citationMorandeira A, López-Duarte I, O’Regan B, Martínez-Díaz MV, Forneli A, Palomares E, et al. Ru(II)-phthalocyanine sensitized solar cells: the influence of co-adsorbents upon interfacial electron transfer kinetics. J Mater Chem 2009;19:5016. https://doi.org/10.1039/b904179f.
dc.identifier.doi10.1039/b904179f
dc.identifier.essn1364-5501
dc.identifier.issn0959-9428
dc.identifier.officialurlhttps://doi.org/10.1039/b904179f
dc.identifier.relatedurlhttps://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2009/jm/b904179f
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/100090
dc.journal.titleJournal of Materials Chemistry
dc.language.isoeng
dc.page.final5026
dc.page.initial5016
dc.publisherThe Royal Society of Chemistry
dc.rights.accessRightsmetadata only access
dc.subject.ucmQuímica
dc.subject.unesco23 Química
dc.titleRu(II)-phthalocyanine sensitized solar cells: the influence of co-adsorbents upon interfacial electron transfer kinetics
dc.typejournal article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationdec7fdad-6ad2-427a-8113-8d81e6becccb
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoverydec7fdad-6ad2-427a-8113-8d81e6becccb

Download

Collections