Is There a Relationship Between Physical Performance Factors and Adverse Reactions to Foodstuffs? The ALASKA Study
Loading...
Download
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication date
2024
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
MDPI
Citation
Pantoja-Arévalo, L., Gesteiro, E., Pérez-Ruiz, M., Tang, S., Urrialde, R., & González-Gross, M. (2024). Is there a relationship between physical performance factors and adverse reactions to foodstuffs? The alaska study. Nutrients, 16(24), 4384. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16244384
Abstract
Background/Objectives: An optimal physical condition has beneficial effects in adults at risk of chronic diseases. However, research data on how adverse reactions to food (ARFSs) are linked to physical performance are lacking. The aims of this study were (a) to investigate the prevalence of ARFS according to age; (b) to analyze physical performance level according to the type of ARFS; and (c) to determine the probability of having a positive ARFS according to physical performance levels. Methods: A cross-sectional study with 254 Spanish adults (61% women; mean age 43.7 ± 13 y) scoring ≥ 6 in PSIMP-ARFSQ-10 (pathologies and symptomatology questionnaire associated with adverse reactions to foodstuffs) was conducted in the region of Madrid, Spain, following the ALASKA study protocol. Immune-mediated variables used to measure ARFS were sIgE and sIgG4 antibody reactions (AbR) (type 1 and type 2 food hypersensitivities, respectively); non-immune-mediated variables used to measure ARFS were lactose intolerance and fructose malabsorption. Physical performance variables were body balance, leg power, sit-to-stand speed, resting heart rate, handgrip strength, and cardiorespiratory fitness. Statistical significance was set at 0.05. Results: The most prevalent sIgE- and sIgG4-mediated ARFSs were against legumes (53% and 46%; 60% and 68% in subjects with ≤45 y and >45 y, respectively). Handgrip strength was significantly lower in subjects positive for lactose intolerance compared to subjects negative for lactose intolerance (p < 0.05). Both the positive mean sIgE and sIgG4 AbR were significantly associated with high physical performance (p < 0.05). Subjects with high physical performance showed a 1.5-fold increase in the odds of the positive mean total sIgE and positive sIgG4 AbR against legumes. Conclusions: In conclusion, subjects aged 45 or younger had a higher prevalence of total type 1 and type 2 food hypersensitivities than subjects older than 45 y. Positive lactose intolerance was linked to lower values of handgrip strength. Subjects with high physical performance, whether male or female, aged ≤45 years, or with a BMI of ≥25, showed significant odds of experiencing type 1 food hypersensitivity to nuts.
Description
This research was partially funded by funds from the ImFINE Research Group. Additional funding was received from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III through CIBEROBN (CB12/03/30038), which is co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund. Lisset Pantoja-Arévalo (L.P.-A.) is supported by the Universidad Politécnica de Madrid by means of an Official Predoctoral Research Contract grant of the Universidad Politécnica de Madrid for research personnel in research training (reference: CPGI/007/2020) for performing a PhD project. This project was additionally funded by Aesku.Diagnostics GmbH through an agreement with the Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (project number: P2011600273). AESKUBLOTS® kits were manufactured and blind-processed by Aesku.Diagnostics GmbH (Aesku.Diagnostics GmbH, Wendelsheim, Germany). However, the design, management, statistical analysis, and reporting of the study have been performed entirely independent of Aesku.Diagnostics GmbH or any other private institute. The ALASKA study was conducted by the ImFINE Research Group of the Department of Health and Human Performance of the Faculty of Physical Activity and Sport Sciences of the Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Industries and/or private institutions had no role in the design, execution, analyses, interpretation of the data, or decision to submit the results.