A comparison of confocal and epifluorescence microscopy for quantification of RNAScope and immunohistochemistry fluorescent images

dc.contributor.authorHonzel, Emily
dc.contributor.authorJoshi, Abhinav
dc.contributor.authorHernández Morato, Ignacio
dc.contributor.authorPennington-FitzGerald, William
dc.contributor.authorPitman, Michael J.
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-04T11:42:52Z
dc.date.available2025-06-04T11:42:52Z
dc.date.issued2023-12-23
dc.description.abstractBackground Quantification of RNA expression and protein production in fluorescent stainings provides critical information concerning neurodevelopment. A trustable independent quantification technique requires acquisition of reliable images prior to image processing. There is uncertainty in existing literature regarding the use of confocal microscopy compared to standard epifluorescence microscopy, especially in the context of RNA in situ hybridization protocols. New method The hindbrains of developing rat embryos from embryologic day 14 (E14) to E20 were sectioned and stained for expression of Hoxb1, Hoxb2, and Phox2b using both RNAScope and immunohistochemistry. Islet1 was used for identification of hindbrain motoneuron cell bodies. Slides were imaged using both confocal and epifluorescence microscopy. Results Expression patterns of both mRNA and protein were similar in both imaging modalities. Analyses of Hoxb1 and Hoxb2 mRNA expression were particularly concordant between-scopes, with similar p-values and posthoc differences between timepoints. Confocal imaging of Hoxb2 protein yielded a significant peak at E18, but this level of significance was not reached using epifluorescence microscopy. Although similar trends were observed, only Phox2b RNAScope results were statistically significant when analyzed with confocal microscopy. In contrast, Phox2b immunostaining analyses showed significant differences using both microscopes. Comparison with existing methods Researchers may save time and financial resources if epifluorescence microscopy provides comparable or equal results as confocal. Conclusions Epifluorescence microscopy appears sufficient for quantification of RNAScope experiments with relatively low puncta per cell, while confocal microscopy gives clearer definition to immunohistochemical protein relationships and may be preferable especially in targets with low protein production.
dc.description.departmentDepto. de Anatomía y Embriología
dc.description.facultyFac. de Medicina
dc.description.refereedTRUE
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institutes of Health
dc.description.statuspub
dc.identifier.citationHonzel, E., Joshi, A., Hernandez-Morato, I., Pennington-FitzGerald, W., & Pitman, M. J. (2024). A comparison of confocal and epifluorescence microscopy for quantification of RNAScope and immunohistochemistry fluorescent images. Journal of neuroscience methods, 403, 110050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2023.110050
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/J.JNEUMETH.2023.110050
dc.identifier.issn0165-0270
dc.identifier.officialurlhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2023.110050
dc.identifier.relatedurlhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165027023002698
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/120890
dc.journal.titleJournal of Neuroscience Methods
dc.language.isoeng
dc.page.initial110050
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.projectID1R01DC018060
dc.rights.accessRightsrestricted access
dc.subject.cdu611
dc.subject.keywordRNAScope
dc.subject.keywordImmunohistochemistry
dc.subject.keywordConfocal
dc.subject.keywordEpifluorescence
dc.subject.keywordMicroscopy
dc.subject.ucmAnatomía
dc.subject.ucmBiología molecular (Biología)
dc.subject.unesco2401.01 Anatomía Animal
dc.subject.unesco2302.21 Biología Molecular
dc.titleA comparison of confocal and epifluorescence microscopy for quantification of RNAScope and immunohistochemistry fluorescent images
dc.typejournal article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number403
dspace.entity.typePublication

Download

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
A comparison of confocal and epifluorescence microscopy.pdf
Size:
4.75 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections