Aviso: para depositar documentos, por favor, inicia sesión e identifícate con tu cuenta de correo institucional de la UCM con el botón MI CUENTA UCM. No emplees la opción AUTENTICACIÓN CON CONTRASEÑA
 

Evaluación clínica de las coronas de circona monolítica de la tercera generación en sectores posteriores. Estudio piloto

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorPeláez Rico, Jesús
dc.contributor.authorGseibat, Mustafa A M
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-17T10:15:53Z
dc.date.available2023-06-17T10:15:53Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractLos objetivos del presente trabajo de investigación clínica prospectivo son: 1- Evaluar el comportamiento clínico de coronas posteriores dentosoportadas de circona monolítica, de la tercera generación a un año de su colocación. 2- Evaluar la resistencia funcional, mediante la presencia o ausencia de fracturas o grietas. 3- Evaluar los parámetros periodontales: índice de gingivitis, índice de placa y profundidad de bolsas. 4- Evaluar la satisfacción del paciente.
dc.description.departmentDepto. de Odontología Conservadora y Prótesis
dc.description.facultyFac. de Odontología
dc.description.refereedTRUE
dc.description.statussubmitted
dc.eprint.idhttps://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/61587
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/9024
dc.language.isospa
dc.master.titleMáster de Ciencias Odontológicas
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.subject.cdu616.314-089.28
dc.subject.keywordPrótesis dentales
dc.subject.keywordOdontología restauradora
dc.subject.keywordMateriales dentales
dc.subject.keywordDentures
dc.subject.keywordRestorative dentistry
dc.subject.keywordDental materials
dc.subject.ucmMateriales dentales
dc.subject.ucmPrótesis dental
dc.subject.unesco3213.13 Ortodoncia-Estomatología
dc.subject.unesco3314.02 Prótesis
dc.titleEvaluación clínica de las coronas de circona monolítica de la tercera generación en sectores posteriores. Estudio piloto
dc.typemaster thesis
dcterms.references1.Raigrodski AJ, Hillstead MB, Meng GK, Chung K-H. Survival and complications ofzirconia-based fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2012;107(3):170–7. 2. Peláez J, Cogolludo PG, Serrano B, Lozano JFL, Suárez MJ. A prospective evaluation of zirconia posterior fixed dental prostheses: three-year clinical results. J Prosthet Dent 2012;107:373–9. 3. Lopez-Suarez C, Rodriguez V, Pelaez J, Agustin-Panadero R, Suarez MJ. Comparative fracture behavior of monolithic and veneered zirconia posterior fixed dental prostheses.Dent Mater J 2017 29;36:816–21. 4. Freire Y, Gonzalo E, Lopez-Suarez C, Suarez MJ. The Marginal Fit of CAD/CAM Monolithic Ceramic and Metal-Ceramic Crowns. J Prosthodont 2019;28:299–304. 5. Gracis S, Thompson VP, Ferencz JL, Silva NRFA, Bonfante EA. A new classification system for all-ceramic and ceramic-like restorative materials. Int J Prosthodont 2015;28:227–35. 6. Pjetursson BE, Sailer I, Makarov NA, Zwahlen M, Thoma DS. All-ceramic or metalceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part II: Multiple-unit FDPs. Dent Mater 2015;31:624–39. 7. Rodríguez V, Castillo-Oyagüe R, López-Suárez C, Gonzalo E, Peláez J, Suárez-García MJ. Fracture Load Before and After Veneering Zirconia Posterior Fixed Dental Prostheses. J Prosthodont 2016;25:550–6. 8. Lopez-Suarez C, Gonzalo E, Pelaez J, Serrano B, Suarez MJ. Marginal Vertical Discrepancies of Monolithic and Veneered Zirconia and Metal-Ceramic Three-Unit Posterior Fixed Dental Prostheses. Int J Prosthodont 2016;29:256–8. 9. Johansson C, Kmet G, Rivera J, Larsson C, Vult Von Steyern P. Fracture strength of monolithic all-ceramic crowns made of high translucent yttrium oxide-stabilized zirconium dioxide compared to porcelain-veneered crowns and lithium disilicate crowns. Acta Odontol Scand 2014;72:145–53. 10. Janyavula S, Lawson N, Lawson N, Cakir D, Beck P, Ramp LC, et al. The wear of polished and glazed zirconia against enamel. J Prosthet Dent 2013;109:22–9. 11. Kim H-K, Kim S-H, Lee J-B, Han J-S, Yeo I-S. Effect of polishing and glazing on the color and spectral distribution of monolithic zirconia. J Adv Prosthodont 2013;5:296–304. 12. Lawson NC, Janyavula S, Syklawer S, McLaren EA, Burgess JO. Wear of enamel opposing zirconia and lithium disilicate after adjustment, polishing and glazing. J Dent 2014;42:1586–91. 13. Sripetchdanond J, Leevailoj C. Wear of human enamel opposing monolithic zirconia, glass ceramic, and composite resin: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1141–50. 14. Chong BJ, Thangavel AK, Rolton SB, Guazzato M, Klineberg IJ. Clinical and laboratory surface finishing procedures for zirconia on opposing human enamel wear: A laboratory study. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2015;50:93–103. 15. Preis V, Schmalzbauer M, Bougeard D, Schneider-Feyrer S, Rosentritt M. Surface properties of monolithic zirconia after dental adjustment treatments and in vitro wear simulation. J Dent 2015;43:133–9. 16. Zandparsa R, El Huni RM, Hirayama H, Johnson MI. Effect of different dental ceramic systems on the wear of human enamel: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:230–7. 17. Huh Y-H, Park C-J, Cho L-R. Evaluation of various polishing systems and the phase transformation of monolithic zirconia. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116:440–9. 18. D’Arcangelo C, Vanini L, Rondoni GD, De Angelis F. Wear properties of dental ceramics and porcelains compared with human enamel. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:350–5. 19. Buciumeanu M, Queiroz JRC, Martinelli AE, Silva FS, Henriques B. The effect of surface treatment on the friction and wear behavior of dental Y-TZP ceramic against human enamel. Tribology International 2017;116:192–8. 20. Fathy SM, Swain MV. In-vitro wear of natural tooth surface opposed with zirconia reinforced lithium silicate glass ceramic after accelerated ageing. Dent Mater 2018;34:551–9. 21. Esquivel-Upshaw JF, Rose WF, Barrett AA, Oliveira ER, Yang MCK, Clark AE, et al.Three years in vivo wear: core-ceramic, veneers, and enamel antagonists. Dent Mater 2012;28:615–21. 22. Stober T, Bermejo JL, Rammelsberg P, Schmitter M. Enamel wear caused by monolithic zirconia crowns after 6 months of clinical use. J Oral Rehabil 2014;41:314–22. 23. Mundhe K, Jain V, Pruthi G, Shah N. Clinical study to evaluate the wear of natural enamel antagonist to zirconia and metal ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:358–63. 24. Esquivel-Upshaw JF, Kim MJ, Hsu SM, Abdulhameed N, Jenkins R, Neal D, et al.Randomized clinical study of wear of enamel antagonists against polished monolithic zirconia crowns. J Dent 2018;68:19–27. 25. Martínez Rus F, Pradíes Ramiro G, Suárez García MJ, Rivera Gómez B. Cerámicas dentales: clasificación y criterios de selección. RCOE 2007;12:253–63. 26. Guess PC, Schultheis S, Bonfante EA, Coelho PG, Ferencz JL, Silva NRFA. All-ceramic systems: laboratory and clinical performance. Dent Clin North Am 2011;55:333–52. 27. McLaren EA, Figueira J. Updating Classifications of Ceramic Dental Materials: A Guide to Material Selection. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2015;36:400–416. 28. Nasr E, Makhlouf A-C, Zebouni E, Makzoumé J. All-ceramic Computer-aided Design and Computer-aided Manufacturing Restorations: Evolution of Structures and Criteria for Clinical Application. J Contemp Dent Pract 2019;20:516–23. 29. Van Dijken JW. All-ceramic restorations: classification and clinical evaluations. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1999;20:1115–24. 30. Helvey G. Classification of Dental Ceramics. Inside Dentistry. April 2013. 31. Piconi C, Maccauro G. Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial. Biomaterials 1999;20:1–25. 32. Vagkopoulou T, Koutayas SO, Koidis P, Strub JR. Zirconia in dentistry: Part 1.Discovering the nature of an upcoming bioceramic. Eur J Esthet Dent 2009;4:130–51. 33. Burgess JO. Zirconia: The Material, Its Evolution, and Composition. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2018;39(suppl 4):4–8. 34. Gautam C, Joyner J, Gautam A, Rao J, Vajtai R. Zirconia based dental ceramics: structure,mechanical properties, biocompatibility and applications. Dalton Trans 2016;45:19194–215. 35. Stawarczyk B, Keul C, Eichberger M, Figge D, Edelhoff D, Lümkemann N. Three generations of zirconia: 
From veneered to monolithic. Part I. Quintessence Int 2017;48:369–80. 36. Stawarczyk B, Keul C, Eichberger M, Figge D, Edelhoff D, Lümkemann N. Three generations of zirconia: 
From veneered to monolithic. Part II. Quintessence Int 2017;48:441–50. 37. Manicone PF, Rossi Iommetti P, Raffaelli L. An overview of zirconia ceramics: basic properties and clinical applications. J Dent 2007;35:819–26. 38. Zhang Y, Lawn BR. Novel Zirconia Materials in Dentistry. J Dent Res 2018;97:140–7. 39. Madfa A, Al-Sanabani F, Al-Qudami N, Al-Sanabani J, Amran A. Use of Zirconia in Dentistry: An Overview. The Open Biomaterials Journal 2014;5:1–9. 40. Zhang Y. Making yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia translucent. Dent Mater 2014;30:1195–203. 41. Fonseca YR, Elias CN, Monteiro SN, Santos HESD, Santos CD. Modeling of the Influence of Chemical Composition, Sintering Temperature, Density, and Thickness in the Light Transmittance of Four Zirconia Dental Prostheses. Materials (Basel) 2019;12:16. 42. Elsaka SE. Optical and Mechanical Properties of Newly Developed Monolithic Multilayer Zirconia. J Prosthodont 2019;28:279–84. 43. Zhang F, Inokoshi M, Batuk M, Hadermann J, Naert I, Van Meerbeek B, et al. Strength,toughness and aging stability of highly-translucent Y-TZP ceramics for dental restorations.Dent Mater 2016;32:327–37. 44. Pereira GKR, Venturini AB, Silvestri T, Dapieve KS, Montagner AF, Soares FZM, et al.Low-temperature degradation of Y-TZP ceramics: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2015;55:151–63. 45. Luna M, Molina I, Vasconcellos D, Volpato C, Suarez M. Consideraciones mecánicas y biológicas sobre el envejecimiento del óxido de circonio odontológico. Revista Internacional de Prótesis Estomatológica 2014;16:15-23. 46. Muñoz EM, Longhini D, Antonio SG, Adabo GL. The effects of mechanical and hydrothermal aging on microstructure and biaxial flexural strength of an anterior and a posterior monolithic zirconia. J Dent 2017;63:94–102. 47. Kim H-K, Kim S-H. Effect of hydrothermal aging on the optical properties of precolored dental monolithic zirconia ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 2019;121:676–82. 48. Teichmann M, Wienert AL, Rückbeil M, Weber V, Wolfart S, Edelhoff D. Ten-year survival and chipping rates and clinical quality grading of zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses. Clin Oral Investig 2018;22:2905–15. 49. Stefanescu C, Ionita C, Nechita V, Drafta S, Oancea L, Petre A. Survival Rates and Complications for Zirconia-Based Fixed Dental Prostheses in a Period up to 10 Years: A Systematic Review. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2018;26:54–61. 50. Tanner J, Niemi H, Ojala E, Tolvanen M, Närhi T, Hjerppe J. Zirconia single crowns and multiple-unit FDPs-An up to 8 -year retrospective clinical study. J Dent 2018;79:96–101. 51. Spies BC, Balmer M, Jung RE, Sailer I, Vach K, Kohal R-J. All-ceramic single crowns supported by zirconia implants: 5-year results of a prospective multicenter study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2019;30:466–75. 52. Kontonasaki E, Rigos AE, Ilia C, Istantsos T. Monolithic Zirconia: An Update to Current Knowledge. Optical Properties, Wear, and Clinical Performance. Dent J (Basel) 2019;7:3. 53. Schriwer C, Skjold A, Gjerdet NR, Øilo M. Monolithic zirconia dental crowns. Internal fit,margin quality, fracture mode and load at fracture. Dent Mater 2017;33:1012–20. 54. Ozer F, Naden A, Turp V, Mante F, Sen D, Blatz MB. Effect of thickness and surface modifications on flexural strength of monolithic zirconia. J Prosthet Dent 2018;119:987–93. 55. Candido LM, Miotto LN, Fais L, Cesar PF, Pinelli L. Mechanical and Surface Properties of Monolithic Zirconia. Oper Dent 2018;43:119–28. 56. Fuster-Torres MA, Albalat-Estela S, Alcañiz-Raya M, Peñarrocha-Diago M. CAD / CAM dental systems in implant dentistry: update. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2009;14:141-145. 57. Tabatabaian F. Color in Zirconia-Based Restorations and Related Factors: A Literature Review. J Prosthodont 2018;27:201–11. 58. Maroulakos G, Thompson GA, Kontogiorgos ED. Effect of cement type on the clinical performance and complications of zirconia and lithium disilicate tooth-supported crowns:A systematic review. Report of the Committee on Research in Fixed Prosthodontics of the American Academy of Fixed Prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 2019;121:754–65. 59. Malkondu O, Tinastepe N, Kazazoglu E. Influence of type of cement on the color and translucency of monolithic zirconia. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116:902–8. 60. Turkoglu P, Sen D. Evaluation of Dual-Cure Resin Cement Polymerization under Different Types and Thicknesses of Monolithic Zirconia. Biomed Res Int 2019;1:1-9. 61. Ruales-Carrera E, Cesar PF, Henriques B, Fredel MC, Özcan M, Volpato CAM. Adhesion behavior of conventional and high-translucent zirconia: Effect of surface conditioning methods and aging using an experimental methodology.J Esthet Restor Dent 2019;31:388–97. 62. Dantas AM, Campos F, Pereira SM, Dos Santos EJ, Pereira LL, Moura DM, et al. The effect of air-particle abrasion and a zirconia primer application on resin cement bonding strength to zirconia. Minerva Stomatol 2019;68:89–94. 63. Blatz MB, Conejo J. Cementation and Bonding of Zirconia Restorations. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2018;39:9–13. 64. Alves M, Campos F, Bergoli CD, Bottino MA, Özcan M, Souza R. Effect of Adhesive Cementation Strategies on the Bonding of Y-TZP to Human Dentin. Oper Dent 2016;41:276–83. 65. Campos F, Valandro LF, Feitosa SA, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ, de Jager N, et al. Adhesive Cementation Promotes Higher Fatigue Resistance to Zirconia Crowns. Oper Dent 2017;42:215–24. 66. Ryge G, Snyder M. Evaluating the clinical quality of restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1973;87:369–77. 67. Peláez Rico J. Evaluación clínica de puentes posteriores de circonio. [MADRID]: UCM; 2010. 68. Sailer I, Makarov NA, Thoma DS, Zwahlen M, Pjetursson BE. All-ceramic or metalceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: Single crowns (SCs). Dent Mater 2015;31:603–23. 69. Pjetursson BE, Sailer I, Zwahlen M, Hämmerle CHF. A systematic review of the survivaland complication rates of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic rec onstructions after an observation period of at least 3 years. Part I: Single crowns. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:73–85. 70. Kassardjian V, Varma S, Andiappan M, Creugers NHJ, Bartlett D. A systematic review and meta analysis of the longevity of anterior and posterior all-ceramic crowns. J Dent 2016;55:1–6. 71. Spitznagel FA, Boldt J, Gierthmuehlen PC. CAD/CAM Ceramic Restorative Materials for Natural Teeth. J Dent Res 2018;97:1082–91. 72. Monaco C, Caldari M, Scotti R, AIOP Clinical Research Group. Clinical evaluation of 1,132 zirconia-based single crowns: a retrospective cohort study from the AIOP clinical research group. Int J Prosthodont 2013;26:435–42. 73. Pjetursson BE, Valente NA, Strasding M, Zwahlen M, Liu S, Sailer I. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic singlecrowns. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018;29:199–214. 74. Aldegheishem A, Ioannidis G, Att W, Petridis H. Success and Survival of Various Types of All-Ceramic Single Crowns: A Critical Review and Analysis of Studies with a Mean Follow-Up of 5 Years or Longer. Int J Prosthodont 2017;30:168–81. 75. Rodrigues SB, Franken P, Celeste RK, Leitune VCB, Collares FM. CAD/CAM or conventional ceramic materials restorations longevity: a systematic review and metaanalysis. J Prosthodont Res 2019;63:389–95. 76. Miura S, Kasahara S, Yamauchi S, Okuyama Y, Izumida A, Aida J, et al. Clinical evaluation of zirconia-based all-ceramic single crowns: an up to 12-year retrospective cohort study. Clin Oral Investig 2018;22:697–706. 77. Larsson C, Wennerberg A. The clinical success of zirconia-based crowns: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont 2014;27:33–43. 78. Spies BC, Balmer M, Jung RE, Sailer I, Vach K, Kohal R-J. All-ceramic single crowns supported by zirconia implants: 5-year results of a prospective multicenter study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2019;30:466–75. 79. Broseghini C, Broseghini M, Gracis S, Vigolo P. Aesthetic functional area protection concept for prevention of ceramic chipping with zirconia frameworks. Int J Prosthodont 2014;27:174–6. 80. Felberg RV, Bassani R, Pereira GKR, Bacchi A, Silva-Sousa YTC, Gomes EA, et al.Restorative Possibilities Using Zirconia Ceramics for Single Crowns. Braz Dent J 2019;30:446–52. 81. Miyazaki T, Nakamura T, Matsumura H, Ban S, Kobayashi T. Current status of zirconiarestoration. J Prosthodont Res 2013;57:236–61. 82. Levartovsky S, Pilo R, Shadur A, Matalon S, Winocur E. Complete rehabilitation of patients with bruxism by veneered and non-veneered zirconia restorations with an increased vertical dimension of occlusion: an observational case-series study. J Prosthodont Res 2019;63:440–6. 83. Koenig V, Wulfman C, Bekaert S, Dupont N, Le Goff S, Eldafrawy M, et al. Clinical behavior of second-generation zirconia monolithic posterior restorations: Two-year results of a prospective study with Ex vivo analyses including patients with clinical signs of bruxism. J Dent 2019;91:1-10. 84. Manziuc M-M, Gasparik C, Burde AV, Colosi HA, Negucioiu M, Dudea D. Effect of glazing on translucency, color, and surface roughness of monolithic zirconia materials. J Esthet Restor Dent 2019;31:478–85. 85. Lee J-H, Kim S-H, Han J-S, Yeo I-SL, Yoon H-I. Optical and Surface Properties of Monolithic Zirconia after Simulated Toothbrushing. Materials (Basel) 2019;12-7. 86. Al Hamad KQ, Abu Al-Addous AM, Al-Wahadni AM, Baba NZ, Goodacre BJ. Surface Roughness of Monolithic and Layered Zirconia Restorations at Different Stages of Finishing and Polishing: An In Vitro Study. J Prosthodont 2019;28:818–25. 87. Baldissara P, Wandscher VF, Marchionatti AME, Parisi C, Monaco C, Ciocca L.Translucency of IPS e.max and cubic zirconia monolithic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2018;120:269–75. 88. Hamza TA, Sherif RM. In vitro evaluation of marginal discrepancy of monolithic zirconia restorations fabricated with different CAD-CAM systems. J Prosthet Dent 2017;117:762–6. 89. Kale E, Cilli M, Özçelik TB, Yilmaz B. Marginal fit of CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated by using cone beam computed tomography scans. J Prosthet Dent 2020;123:731–7. 90. Dandoulaki C, Rigos AE, Kontonasaki E, Karagiannis V, Kokoti M, Theodorou GS, et al.In vitro evaluation of the shear bond strength and bioactivity of a bioceramic cement for bonding monolithic zirconia. J Prosthet Dent 2019;122:167-179. 91. Tang Z, Zhao X, Wang H, Liu B. Clinical evaluation of monolithic zirconia crowns for posterior teeth restorations. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019;98:1-7. 92. Konstantinidis I, Trikka D, Gasparatos S, Mitsias ME. Clinical Outcomes of Monolithic Zirconia Crowns with CAD/CAM Technology. A 1-Year Follow-Up Prospective Clinical Study of 65 Patients. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018;15:1-11. 93. Bankoğlu Güngör M, karakoca nemli S, Caglar A, Aydın C, Yılmaz H. Clinical study on the success of posterior monolithic zirconia crowns and fixed dental prostheses: preliminary report. Acta Odontologica Turcica 2017;34:104-108. 94. Kitaoka A, Akatsuka R, Kato H, Yoda N, Sasaki K. Clinical Evaluation of Monolithic Zirconia Crowns: A Short-Term Pilot Report. Int J Prosthodont 2018;31:124–6. 95. Gunge H, Ogino Y, Kihara M, Tsukiyama Y, Koyano K. Retrospective clinical evaluation of posterior monolithic zirconia restorations after 1 to 3.5 years of clinical service. Journal of Oral Science 2017;60:154-158. 96. Bömicke W, Rammelsberg P, Stober T, Schmitter M. Short-Term Prospective Clinical Evaluation of Monolithic and Partially Veneered Zirconia Single Crowns. J Esthet Restor Dent 2017;29:22–30. 97. Batson ER, Cooper LF, Duqum I, Mendonça G. Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:770–7. 98. Pathan MS, Kheur MG, Patankar AH, Kheur SM. Assessment of Antagonist Enamel Wear and Clinical Performance of Full-Contour Monolithic Zirconia Crowns: One-Year Results of a Prospective Study. J Prosthodont 2019;28:411–6. 99. Worni A, Katsoulis J, Kolgeci L, Worni M, Mericske-Stern R. Monolithic zirconia reconstructions supported by teeth and implants: 1- to 3-year results of a case series. Quintessence Int 2017;48:459–67. 100. Sulaiman TA, Abdulmajeed AA, Donovan TE, Cooper LF, Walter R. Fracture rate of monolithic zirconia restorations up to 5 years: A dental laboratory survey. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116:436–9. 101. Rayyan MR. Marginal Adaptation of Monolithic High-Translucency Versus PorcelainVeneered Zirconia Crowns. Int J Prosthodont 2019;32:364–6. 102. Paul N, Raghavendra Swamy KN, Dhakshaini MR, Sowmya S, Ravi MB. Marginal and internal fit evaluation of conventional metal-ceramic versus zirconia CAD/CAM crowns. J Clin Exp Dent 2020;12:31–7. 103. Meirowitz A, Bitterman Y, Levy S, Mijiritsky E, Dolev E. An in vitro evaluation of marginal fit zirconia crowns fabricated by a CAD-CAM dental laboratory and a milling center. BMC Oral Health 2019;19:1-6. 104. Rau SA, Raedel M, Mikeli A, Raedel M, Walter MH. Clinical Fit of Monolithic Zirconia Single Crowns. Int J Prosthodont 2018;31:443–5. 105. Sakornwimon N, Leevailoj C. Clinical marginal fit of zirconia crowns and patients’preferences for impression techniques using intraoral digital scanner versus polyvinyl siloxane material. J Prosthet Dent 2017;118:386–91. 106. California Dental Association. CDA Code of Ethics. J Calif Dent Assoc 2005;33:65–71. 107. Suarez MJ, Perez C, Pelaez J, Lopez-Suarez C, Gonzalo E. A Randomized ClinicalTrial Comparing Zirconia and Metal-Ceramic Three-Unit Posterior Fixed Partial Dentures:A 5-Year Follow-Up. J Prosthodont 2019;28:750–6. 108. Viitaniemi L, Abdulmajeed A, Sulaiman T, Söderling E, Närhi T. Adhesion and Early Colonization of S. Mutans on Lithium Disilicate Reinforced Glass-Ceramics, Monolithic Zirconia and Dual Cure Resin Cement. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2017;25:228–34. 109. Vrochari AD, Eliades G, Hellwig E, Wrbas KT. Water sorption and solubility of four self-etching, self-adhesive resin luting agents. J Adhes Dent 2010;12:39–43. 110. Lee D-H, Mai H-N, Thant PP, Hong S-H, Kim J, Jeong S-M, et al. Effects of different surface finishing protocols for zirconia on surface roughness and bacterial biofilm formation. J Adv Prosthodont 2019;11:41–7. 111. Mai H-N, Hong S-H, Kim S-H, Lee D-H. Effects of different finishing/polishing protocols and systems for monolithic zirconia on surface topography, phase transformation, and biofilm formation. J Adv Prosthodont 2019;11:81–7. 112. Nakamura K, Mouhat M, Nergård JM, Lægreid SJ, Kanno T, Milleding P, et al. Effect of cements on fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia crowns. Acta Biomater Odontol Scand 2016;2:12–9. 113. Franco-Tabares S, Stenport VF, Hjalmarsson L, Johansson CB. Limited Effect of Cement Material on Stress Distribution of a Monolithic Translucent Zirconia Crown: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis. Int J Prosthodont 2018;31:67–70. 114. Blatz MB, Vonderheide M, Conejo J. The Effect of Resin Bonding on Long-Term Success of High-Strength Ceramics. J Dent Res 2018;97:132–9. 115. Bayindir F, Koseoglu M. The effect of restoration thickness and resin cement shade on the color and translucency of a high-translucency monolithic zirconia. J Prosthet Dent 2020;123:149–54.
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAdvisorOfPublication99246851-94a2-44a2-aaa7-813b0dc6f2a0
relation.isAdvisorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery99246851-94a2-44a2-aaa7-813b0dc6f2a0

Download

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
MUSTAF A M GSEIBAT TFM (1).pdf
Size:
4.68 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
downoload Download

Collections

Trabajos Fin de Master (TFM)