Para depositar en Docta Complutense, identifícate con tu correo @ucm.es en el SSO institucional. Haz clic en el desplegable de INICIO DE SESIÓN situado en la parte superior derecha de la pantalla. Introduce tu correo electrónico y tu contraseña de la UCM y haz clic en el botón MI CUENTA UCM, no autenticación con contraseña.

Welfare assessment of turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo gallopavo) on farm

dc.contributor.authorNielsen, Søren Saxmose
dc.contributor.authorÁlvarez Sánchez, Julio
dc.contributor.authorBoklund, Anette
dc.contributor.authorDippel, Sabine
dc.contributor.authorDorea, Fernanda
dc.contributor.authorFiguerola, Jordi
dc.contributor.authorHerskin, Mette S.
dc.contributor.authorMichel, Virginie
dc.contributor.authorMiranda Chueca, Miguel Angel
dc.contributor.authorNannoni, Eleonora
dc.contributor.authorNonno, Romolo
dc.contributor.authorStahl, Karl
dc.contributor.authorBerk, Jutta
dc.contributor.authorMarchewka, Joanna
dc.contributor.authorvan Staaveren, Nienke
dc.contributor.authorBalmos, Oana Maria
dc.contributor.authorFabris, Chiara
dc.contributor.authorMosbach‐Schulz, Olaf
dc.contributor.authorVan der Stede, Yves
dc.contributor.authorVitali, Marika
dc.contributor.authorRojo Gimeno, Cristina
dc.contributor.authorVelarde, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorRiber, Anja Brinch
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-24T18:02:25Z
dc.date.available2026-02-24T18:02:25Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.descriptionACKNOWLEDGEMENTS EFSA wishes to thank the following for the support provided to this scientific output: Nedra Abdelli that provided preparatory work under Specific agreement no 5 of the Framework Partnership Agreement No GP/EFSA/ALPHA/2021/10, Karen Schwean Lardner who provided preparatory work through contract EOI/EFSA/2022/01‐ CT 37 BIOHAW and Martina Zappaterra who provided preparatory work through contract EOI/EFSA/2022/01‐ CT 25 BIOHAW. EFSA wishes to thank EFSA trainees Giulia Cecchinatto and Julia Kondrashova for their support with the references. EFSA wishes to thank Tim Burnside, John Ralph and Ana Granados Chapatte for their participation in the technical hearing and Gerard Leveque for his inputs. EFSA wishes to thank Julia Ribalta and Mieria Campoy for the provision of data. EFSA wishes to acknowledge all European competent institutions, Member State bodies and other organisations that provided data through the Public call for evidence for this scientific output
dc.description.abstractThis Scientific Opinion assesses the welfare of turkeys of all ages (Meleagris gallopavo gallopavo) on farm in relation to the type and condition of the litter, type and availability of enrichment (including covered veranda and outdoor range), space allowance, concentrations of ammonia and carbon dioxide, effective environmental temperature, group size, nest conditions, lighting conditions and hatchery conditions, by using 19 welfare consequences and associated animal-based measures (ABMs) for their assessment. In addition, the risks posed by the practices of flock thinning and removal of hens, mutilations (i.e. beak trimming, desnooding and toe trimming), artificial insemination (including semen collection) and feed restriction are assessed, with the latter two practices only in turkey breeders. The welfare consequences of breeding is assessed. Recommendations to prevent and/or mitigate relevant welfare consequences in fattening and breeder turkeys include increasing space allowance compared to the currently provided space, avoiding feed and water deprivation of newly-hatched poults for more than 48 h, and providing enrichment such as elevated platforms, straw-bales and a covered veranda. It is recommended to maintain dry litter conditions, i.e. below a threshold of 35%-40% humidity. Beak trimming, desnooding and toe trimming as well as the associated welfare consequences can be avoided if the recommended housing and management practices are implemented, e.g. increasing space allowance and providing suitable enrichment. It is recommended to discontinue flock thinning and avoid quantitative feed restriction, the latter currently practised in breeder toms. Also, it is recommended to place more emphasis on leg health and less on weight gain in genetic selection. The selected ABMs to monitor relevant welfare consequences at the slaughterhouse are total mortality, plumage damage, carcass condemnation, wounds, breast blisters and footpad dermatitis
dc.description.departmentDepto. de Sanidad Animal
dc.description.facultyFac. de Veterinaria
dc.description.refereedTRUE
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Commission
dc.description.statuspub
dc.identifier.citationEFSA Panel Animal Health and Animal Welfare (AHAW), Nielsen, S. S., Alvarez, J., Boklund, A., Dippel, S., Dorea, F., Figuerola, J., Herskin, M. S., Michel, V., Miranda Chueca, M. A., Nannoni, E., Nonno, R., Stahl, K., Berk, J., Marchewka, J., van Staaveren, N., Balmos, O. M., Fabris, C., Mosbach-Schulz, O., Van der Stede, Y., … Riber, A. B. (2026). Welfare assessment of turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo gallopavo) on farm. EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 24(2), e9851. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2026.9851
dc.identifier.doi10.2903/j.efsa.2026.9851
dc.identifier.essn1831-4732
dc.identifier.officialurlhttps://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2026.9851
dc.identifier.pmid41640975
dc.identifier.relatedurlhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41640975/
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/133114
dc.issue.numbere9851
dc.journal.titleEFSA Journal
dc.language.isoeng
dc.page.final187
dc.page.initial1
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.projectIDGP/EFSA/ALPHA/2021/10
dc.relation.projectIDEOI/EFSA/2022/01- CT 37 BIOHAW
dc.relation.projectIDEOI/EFSA/2022/01- CT 25 BIOHAW
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subject.cdu636.5
dc.subject.keywordAnimal‐based measures
dc.subject.keywordMutilation
dc.subject.keywordRisk assessment
dc.subject.keywordSpace allowance
dc.subject.keywordTurkeys
dc.subject.keywordWelfare
dc.subject.ucmAvicultura
dc.subject.unesco3104.09 Avicultura
dc.titleWelfare assessment of turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo gallopavo) on farm
dc.typejournal article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number24(2)
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication7a0cfc93-a3f1-45bf-b529-403f216cf8f7
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery7a0cfc93-a3f1-45bf-b529-403f216cf8f7

Download

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Welfare assessment.pdf
Size:
5.09 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections