Aviso: para depositar documentos, por favor, inicia sesión e identifícate con tu cuenta de correo institucional de la UCM con el botón MI CUENTA UCM. No emplees la opción AUTENTICACIÓN CON CONTRASEÑA
 

Evidence of Bilateral Localized, but Not Widespread, Pressure Pain Hypersensitivity in Patients With Upper Extremity Tendinopathy/Overuse Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

dc.contributor.authorFernández de las Peñas, César
dc.contributor.authorNavarro Santana, Marcos José
dc.contributor.authorCleland, Joshua A.
dc.contributor.authorArias Buría, José L.
dc.contributor.authorPlaza Manzano, Gustavo
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-13T14:21:25Z
dc.date.available2024-06-13T14:21:25Z
dc.date.issued2021-05-13
dc.description.abstractObjective The presence of altered nociceptive pain processing in patients with upper extremity tendinopathy/overuse injury is conflicting. Our aim was to compare pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) in symptomatic and distant pain-free areas between patients with upper extremity tendinopathy/overuse injury and controls. Methods Five databases were searched from inception to October 15, 2020. The authors selected case-control studies comparing PPTs between individuals with upper extremity tendinopathy/overuse injury and pain-free controls. Data were extracted for population, diagnosis, sample size, outcome, and type of algometer. Results were extracted by 3 reviewers. The methodological quality/risk of bias (Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale) and evidence level (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach) were assessed. Meta-analyses of symptomatic, segment-related, and distant pain-free areas were compared. Results The search identified 807 publications with 19 studies (6 shoulder, 13 elbow) eligible for inclusion. The methodological quality ranged from fair (48%) to good (37%). Patients exhibited lower bilateral PPTs than controls at the symptomatic area (affected side: MD = −175.89 kPa [95% CI = −220.30 to −131.48 kPa]; nonaffected side: MD = −104.50 kPa [95% CI = −142.72 to −66.28 kPa]) and the segment-related area (affected side: MD = −150.63 kPa [95% CI = −212.05 to −89.21 kPa]; nonaffected side: MD = −170.34 kPa [95% CI = − 248.43 to −92.25]) than controls. No significant differences in PPTs over distant pain-free areas were observed. Conclusion Low to moderate quality evidence suggests bilateral hypersensitivity to pressure pain at the symptomatic and contralateral/mirror areas in patients with upper extremity tendinopathies/overuse injury. Moderate quality of evidence supports bilateral pressure pain sensitivity in the segment-related area (neck) in lateral epicondylalgia, but not in subacromial impingement syndrome. No evidence of widespread pressure pain hyperalgesia was reported. Impact Early identification of people with altered pain modulation could guide clinicians in treatment strategies. This review shows that there is a complex interplay between peripheral and central pain mechanisms in upper extremity tendinopathies/overuse injuries and that there likely are different subgroups of patients with upper extremity conditions.
dc.description.departmentSección Deptal. de Radiología, Rehabilitación y Fisioterapia (Enfermería)
dc.description.facultyFac. de Enfermería, Fisioterapia y Podología
dc.description.refereedTRUE
dc.description.statuspub
dc.identifier.citationFernández-de-Las-Peñas, C., Navarro-Santana, M. J., Cleland, J. A., Arias-Buria, J. L., & Plaza-Manzano, G. (2021). Evidence of bilateral localized, but not widespread, pressure pain hypersensitivity in patients with upper extremity tendinopathy/overuse injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Physical Therapy, 101(8), pzab131.
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ptj/pzab131
dc.identifier.issn0031-9023
dc.identifier.issn1538-6724
dc.identifier.officialurlhttps://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzab131
dc.identifier.relatedurlhttps://academic.oup.com/ptj/article/101/8/pzab131/6275369?login=false
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/104901
dc.issue.number8
dc.journal.titlePhysical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal
dc.language.isoeng
dc.page.initialpzab131
dc.publisherOxford University Press
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subject.cdu615.8
dc.subject.keywordTendinopathy
dc.subject.keywordAlgometer
dc.subject.keywordElbow
dc.subject.keywordMeta-Analysis
dc.subject.keywordPressure Pain
dc.subject.keywordShoulder Impingement Syndrome
dc.subject.ucmFisioterapia (Enfermería, Fisioterapia y Podología)
dc.subject.unesco3213.11 Fisioterapia
dc.titleEvidence of Bilateral Localized, but Not Widespread, Pressure Pain Hypersensitivity in Patients With Upper Extremity Tendinopathy/Overuse Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
dc.typejournal article
dc.type.hasVersionAM
dc.volume.number101
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationd91506ee-5ef0-43c6-a67b-96f83794f686
relation.isAuthorOfPublicatione7f91ea8-207a-4a4b-9dc4-48d4616fe468
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd91506ee-5ef0-43c6-a67b-96f83794f686

Download

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2021 Evidence of Bilateral Localized, but Not Widespread, Pressure Pain Hypersensitivity in Patients with Upper Extremity Tendinopathy Overuse Injury.pdf
Size:
1.48 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections