La disolución del Parlamento: el sistema español en el marco del parlamentarismo contemporáneo
Loading...
Download
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication date
2025
Defense date
20/12/2024
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Citation
Abstract
Desde la irrupción del multipartidismo polarizado, el régimen parlamentario español se ha enfrentado a situaciones críticas que han desencadenado novedosas controversias sobre la disolución de las Cámaras. Estos trances inesperados han hecho aflorar graves disfunciones en la regulación de esta institución y notables deficiencias en su tratamiento doctrinal. Este trabajo estudia los tres supuestos de disolución que prevé la Constitución de 1978 (arts. 99.5, 115 y 168.1), junto con las figuras análogas que existen en las Comunidades Autónomas. A través de un recurso constante al derecho comparado, se resaltan las peculiaridades del sistema de disolución vigente y se examina el origen, la finalidad y las implicaciones de sus distintas reglas. Para ello, se presta especial atención al modo en que interactúan la disolución y otros mecanismos constitucionales, así como a las influencias recíprocas entre el ordenamiento jurídico y la realidad política. El objetivo de esta memoria es triple: en primer lugar, busca esclarecer el significado de preceptos ambiguos y dar respuesta a hipótesis problemáticas que podrían surgir en el futuro; en segundo lugar, trata de aportar una nueva perspectiva que mejore la comprensión de nuestra forma de gobierno y despeje posibles confusiones; por último, pretende ofrecer un análisis crítico del diseño constitucional y de su rendimiento, que pueda servir de base para considerar su eventual reforma...
Since the emergence of a polarized multiparty system, the Spanish parliamentary system has faced critical situations that have triggered novel controversies on the dissolution of the Chambers. These unexpected events have brought to light serious dysfunctions in the regulation of this institution and notable gaps in its doctrinal treatment. This work studies the three cases of dissolution provided for in the 1978 Constitution (arts. 99.5, 115 and 168.1), as well as analogous procedures that exist in the Autonomous Communities. Through a constant recourse to comparative law, the peculiarities of the current dissolution system are highlighted and the origin, purpose and implications of its different rules are examined. Special attention is paid to the way in which dissolution and other constitutional mechanisms interact, and to the reciprocalinfluences between the legal system and the political reality. The aim of this thesis isthree fold: firstly, it seeks to clarify the meaning of ambiguous precepts and to provideanswers to problematic hypotheses that could arise in the future; secondly, it attempts to provide a new perspective that improves the understanding of our form of government and clears up possible confusion; lastly, it aims to offer a critical analysis of the constitutional design and its performance, which can serve as a basis for considering its eventual reform.
Since the emergence of a polarized multiparty system, the Spanish parliamentary system has faced critical situations that have triggered novel controversies on the dissolution of the Chambers. These unexpected events have brought to light serious dysfunctions in the regulation of this institution and notable gaps in its doctrinal treatment. This work studies the three cases of dissolution provided for in the 1978 Constitution (arts. 99.5, 115 and 168.1), as well as analogous procedures that exist in the Autonomous Communities. Through a constant recourse to comparative law, the peculiarities of the current dissolution system are highlighted and the origin, purpose and implications of its different rules are examined. Special attention is paid to the way in which dissolution and other constitutional mechanisms interact, and to the reciprocalinfluences between the legal system and the political reality. The aim of this thesis isthree fold: firstly, it seeks to clarify the meaning of ambiguous precepts and to provideanswers to problematic hypotheses that could arise in the future; secondly, it attempts to provide a new perspective that improves the understanding of our form of government and clears up possible confusion; lastly, it aims to offer a critical analysis of the constitutional design and its performance, which can serve as a basis for considering its eventual reform.