Críticas ordinarias y sentido de la justicia en contextos de inmigración
Loading...
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication date
2021
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas
Citation
Abstract
El artículo se centra en el análisis de críticas ordinarias formuladas por inmigrantes latinoamericanos con respecto a situaciones experimentadas en el marco de las relaciones laborales o ante la administración pública. Tras la exposición de las denuncias de acciones consideradas injustas y de las formas discursivas empleadas al hacerlo, se pone en evidencia las condiciones de posibilidad del diálogo y de la escucha, así como las diferentes lógicas y economías morales presentes según los contextos. Se destaca el contraste entre el discurso público y el privado, el juicio inmediato y el retrospectivo, y cómo la reapropiación reflexiva de los hechos mediante el relato contribuye a restablecer temporal y localmente la integridad moral de los agentes sociales.
This article focuses on the analysis of expressions of ordinary criticism made by Latin American immigrants with regard to situations experienced within the framework of labor relations or when dealing with public authorities in Spain. This article presents examples of complaints lodged for actions deemed unjust by Latin American immigrants, the discursive forms that formulate said grievances and the conditions for potentially facilitating the dialogue of the parties involved, as well as the differing rationales and moral economies manifested according to context. The study highlights the contrast between public and private discourse and between immediate and hindsight judgments, focusing on how the reflective re-appropriation of facts through the reporting of events allows social agents to reestablish, temporarily and locally, their moral integrity.
This article focuses on the analysis of expressions of ordinary criticism made by Latin American immigrants with regard to situations experienced within the framework of labor relations or when dealing with public authorities in Spain. This article presents examples of complaints lodged for actions deemed unjust by Latin American immigrants, the discursive forms that formulate said grievances and the conditions for potentially facilitating the dialogue of the parties involved, as well as the differing rationales and moral economies manifested according to context. The study highlights the contrast between public and private discourse and between immediate and hindsight judgments, focusing on how the reflective re-appropriation of facts through the reporting of events allows social agents to reestablish, temporarily and locally, their moral integrity.