Para depositar en Docta Complutense, identifícate con tu correo @ucm.es en el SSO institucional. Haz clic en el desplegable de INICIO DE SESIÓN situado en la parte superior derecha de la pantalla. Introduce tu correo electrónico y tu contraseña de la UCM y haz clic en el botón MI CUENTA UCM, no autenticación con contraseña.

Measuring criteria weights by means of Dimension Theory

dc.contributor.authorGómez González, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorMontero De Juan, Francisco Javier
dc.contributor.authorYáñez Gestoso, Francisco Javier
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-20T10:50:40Z
dc.date.available2023-06-20T10:50:40Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.description.abstractMeasuring criteria weights in multicriteria decision making is a key issue in order to amalgamate information when reality is being described from several different points of view. In this paper we propose a method for evaluating those weights taking advantage of Dimension Theory, which allows the representation of the set of alternatives within a real space, provided that decision maker preferences satisfy certain consistency conditions. Such a representation allows a first information about possible underlying criteria in decision maker’s mind. In particular, we propose to measure the importance of those underlying criteria by means of all possible representations associated to the dimension of the binary preference relations between criteria, each one being understood as a linear order of the set of alternatives.en
dc.description.departmentDepto. de Estadística e Investigación Operativa
dc.description.facultyFac. de Ciencias Matemáticas
dc.description.refereedTRUE
dc.description.sponsorshipGobierno de España
dc.description.statuspub
dc.eprint.idhttps://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/29070
dc.identifier.issn1134-5632
dc.identifier.officialurlhttp://dmle.cindoc.csic.es/revistas/detalle.php?numero=4359
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/51325
dc.issue.number3
dc.journal.titleMathware & Soft Computing
dc.language.isoeng
dc.page.final188
dc.page.initial173
dc.publisherEuropean Society for Fuzzy Logic and Technology
dc.relation.projectIDTIN2006-0619
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.subject.cdu515.12
dc.subject.keywordMulticriteria Decision Analysis
dc.subject.keywordValued Preference Relations
dc.subject.keywordDimension Theory
dc.subject.ucmTopología
dc.subject.unesco1210 Topología
dc.titleMeasuring criteria weights by means of Dimension Theoryen
dc.typejournal article
dc.volume.number13
dcterms.references[1] A. Amo, D. Gomez, J. Montero and G. Biging. Relevance and redundancy in fuzzy classification systems. Mathware and Soft Computing 8, 203-216 (2001). [2] A. Amo, J. Montero and E. Molina. Representation of consistent recursive rules. European Journal of Operational Research 130, 29-53 (2001). [3] A. Amo, J. Montero, G. Biging and V. Cutello. Fuzzy classification systems. European Journal of Operational Research 156, 459-507 (2004). [4] T. Calvo, G. Mayor and R. Mesiar, eds. Aggregation operators. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg (2002). [5] V. Cutello and J. Montero. Recursive connective rules. Intelligent Systems 14,3-20 (1999). [6] J.P. Doignon and J. Mitas. Dimension of valued relations. European Journal of Operational Research 125, 571-587 (2000). [7] B. Dushnik and E.W. Miller. Partially ordered sets. American Journal of Mathematics 63, 600-610 (1941). [8] J. Figueira and B. Roy: Determining the weights of criteria in the ELECTRE type methods with a revised Simon’s procedure. European Journal Of Operational Research 139, 317-326 (2002). [9] J.C. Fodor and M. Roubens. Structure of valued binary relations. Mathematical Social Sciences 30, 71-94 (1995). [10] D. G´omez, J. Montero and J. Yañez. A dimension-based representation in multicriteria decision making. Proceedings EUSFLAT’05 Conference (UPC Press, Barcelona), pp. 910-915. [11] D. G´omez, J. Montero, J. Yañez, J. Gonzalez-Pachon and V. Cutello. Crisp dimension theory and valued preference relations. International Journal of General Systems 33, 115-131 (2004). [12] D. G´omez, J. Montero and J. Yañez. A coloring algorithm for image classifi-cation. Information Sciences 176, 3645-3657 (2006). [13] D. Gomez, J. Montero, J. Yañez, C. Poidomani. A graph coloring algorithm approach for image segmentation. Omega 35, 173-183 (2007). [14] J. Gonzalez-Pachon, D. Gomez, J. Montero and J.Yañez. Searching for the dimension of binary valued preference relations. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 33, 133-157 (2003). [15] J. Gonzalez-Pachon, D. Gomez, J. Montero and J. Yañez. Soft dimension theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 137, 137-149 (2003). [16] R. L. Keeny and H. Raiffa. Decision with multiple objetives- preferences and valued tradeoffs. Cambridge U iversity Press, Cambridge (1993). [17] B. Roy. Decision aid and decision making. European Journal of Operational Research 45, 324-331 (1990). [18] T. L. Saaty. The analytic hierarchy process, MacGraw Hill, New York (1980). [19] J. Simos. L’evaluation environnementale: Un processus cognitif negocie These de doctorat, DGF-EPFL, Lausanne. (1990). [20] E. Szpilrajn. Sur l’extension de l’ordre partiel. Fundamenta Mathematicae 16,386-389 (1930). [21] W.T. Trotter. Combinatorics and Partially Ordered Sets. Dimension Theory. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London (1992). [22] M. Yannakakis. On the complexity of the partial order dimension problem. SIAM Journal of Algebra and Discrete Mathematics 3, 351-358 (1982). [23] J. Yañez and J. Montero. A poset dimension algorithm. Journal of Algorithms 30, 185-208 (2000).
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication4dcf8c54-8545-4232-8acf-c163330fd0fe
relation.isAuthorOfPublication9e4cf7df-686c-452d-a98e-7b2602e9e0ea
relation.isAuthorOfPublication5ce22aab-a4c1-4dfe-b8f9-78e09cbd2878
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery4dcf8c54-8545-4232-8acf-c163330fd0fe

Download

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Montero120.pdf
Size:
229.77 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections