Limits and Possibilities of Resilience as a Psycho-Sociological Strategic Game: an Interdisciplinary Approach
| dc.contributor.author | Romero Moñivas, Jesús | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-06-24T09:58:55Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-06-24T09:58:55Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022-07-19 | |
| dc.description | This paper is funded by the R&D Project ‘A proposal for the epistemological integration of sociology and biology from the analysis of human ambivalence (PR65/19-22435) (2020–2022)’ granted to the author by the Administration of the Community of Madrid and Complutense University of Madrid (Spain). Referencias Bibliográficas: • Fletcher D., Sarkar M. (2013). Psychological resilience: a review and critique of definitions, concepts, and theory. European Psycholigist, 18(1), 12–23 • Dartnell, L. (2020). Orígenes. Cómo la historia de la tierra determina la historia de la humanidad .Barcelona: Debate. • Romero Moñivas, J. (2022). La sociedad a medias: hacia una definición de los rasgos de la socialidad humana. Revista Centra de Ciencias Sociales,1(1), 133-150. • Liu, H., Zhang, C., Ji, Y. & Yang, L. (2018). Biological and Psychological Perspectives of Resilience: Is It Possible to Improve Stress Resistance? Frontiers in human neuroscience, 12, 326. • Westphal, Maren & Bonanno, George. (2007). Posttraumatic Growth and Resilience to Trauma: Different Sides of the Same Coin or Different Coins? Applied Psychology, 56, 417-427. • Frankl, V. (2004).El hombre en busca de sentido.Barcelona: Herder. • Romero Moñivas, J. (2010). Génesis y desarrollo de la metafísica (dinámica) de la unión de Teilhard de Chardin. Estudio histórico-sistemático. Estudios filosóficos, (171), 221-255. • Iriarte, E. (1998). Aportes de la ética al estudio de la tragedia. Aportes de la tragedia al estudio de la ́etica. Universithas Philosphica, 29-30, 83-104. • Damasio, A. y Damasio, H. (2016). Exploring the concept of homeostasis and considering its implications for economics. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 126, 25-129. • Elias, N. (1985). Humana Conditio: Beobachtungen zur Entwicklung der Menschheit am 40 . Jahrestag eines Kriegsendes, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. • Romero Moñivas, J. (2013). The Problem of Freedom in Norbert Elias in Dialogue with the Neurosciences. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 142, 93-116. • Stix, Gary (2011). The Neuroscience of True Grit. Scientific American, 304(3), 28-33. • Sapolsky, R. (2019). Desigualdad econ ́omica y salud p ́ublica. Investigaci ́on y Ciencia , 508, 69-71. • Russo, S. J., Murrough, J. W., Han, M. H., Charney, D. S., & Nestler, E. J. (2012). Neurobiology of resilience. Nature neuroscience, • Turner, J. (2021). On human nature. The Biology and Sociology of What Made us Human. New York: Routledge. • Turner, J. y Maryanski, A. (2016). On the Origin of Societies by Natural Selection. London: Routledge. • Sosa, J. L. R., Buonomano, D., & Izquierdo, A. (2021). The orbitofrontal cortex in temporal cognition. Behavioral Neuroscience, 135(2), 154-164. • Gazzaniga, M. S. (2019). El instinto de la conciencia. Cómo el cerebro crea la mente.. Barcelona: Paidós • Lumbreras, S. (2020).Respuestas al transhumanismo. Cuerpo, autenticidad y sentido. Madrid: Digital Reasons. • Durkheim, E. (1913). Le probl`eme religieux et la dualit ́e de la nature humaine. Bulletin de la Soci ́et ́e fran ̧caise de philosophie, 13, 63-100. • Kerbo, H. R. (2004) .Estratificación Social y Desigualdad. El conflicto de clase en perspectiva histórica, comparada y global .Madrid: McGrawHill. • Cabada Castro, M. (1994). La vigencia del amor. Afectividad, hominización y religiosidad. Madrid: San Pablo. • Strahler, J. (2018). Las cualidades de la resiliencia. Mente y Cerebro, 91, 24-29. • Thivissen, P. (2018). Meditar para mantener la calma. Mente y Cerebro, 91, 30-32. • Hartmann, U. Schneider, U., Emrich H. M. (2003). La búsqueda de la felicidad. Mente y Cerebro,4, 78-83. • Thivissen, P. (2018). La importancia del sentido de la vida. Mente y Cerebro , 90, 50-55. • Retzbach, J. (2018). La felicidad se construye con sentido. Mente y Cerebro, 90, 44-49. • Perrin, A. J. (2007). The undertheorized environment: sociological theory and the ontology of behavioral genetics. Social Perspectives, 50(2), 303-322. • García, E. (2004). Medio ambiente y sociedad. La civilización industrial y los límites del planeta. Madrid: Alianza Editorial. • Frankl, V. (2004). El hombre en busca de sentido. Barcelona: Herder. • Durán, A. J. (2017) Matemáticas. Una breve historia de la ciencia más Antigua y sus personajes. Barcelona: Crítica. • Giner, S. (2014). Sociodicea. Revista internacional de sociología, 72(2), 287-302. • Cabanas, E., Illouz, E. (2019). Happycracia: Cómo la ciencia y la industria de la felicidad controlan nuestras vidas. Barcelona: Paidós. • Elias, N. (1981).Was ist Soziologie? M ̈unchen: Juventa Verlag • Romero Moñivas, J. (2022). La sociedad a medias: hacia una definición de los rasgos de la socialidad humana. Revista Centra de Ciencias Sociales, 1(1), 133-150. • Lieberman, M. D. (2013). Social. Why our brains are wired to connect. New York: Brodway Books. • Serpell, J. (1996). In the company of animals. A study of Human-Animal Relationships Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. • Romero Moñivas, J. (2022). Ageing Brain and geopolitical leadership. A bio-psicho-sociological approach to the fall of Sharif of Mecca Hussein ibn Ali, 1908-1924. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 47(1), 76-96. • Romero Moñivas, J. (2018). Is the Ambivalence a Sign of the Multiple-Self Nature of the Human Being? Interdisciplinary Remarks. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science 52, 523-545. • Ampudia de Haro, F. (2010). El logro del éxito: la dimensión social de la literatura de autoayuda. Revista Española de Sociología 13, 11-30. • Lawrence, R. (2020). Advancing with Transdisciplinarity: Effective Responses for Coronavirus. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science, 11. https://doi.org/10.22545/2020/00141 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The aim of this paper is to analyze the psycho-sociological complexity inherent in the exercise of resilience. The concept of resilience has become so popular that it is usual in academic publications, In popular self-help publications, and in everyday conversations. This monographic issue shows the variety of empirical studies of resilience in different fields. However, my contribution is fundamentally theoretical insofar as it tries to analyze the limits and possibilities of the very concept of resilience. Indeed, human society is inherently ambiguous and ambivalent. This requires a capacity for flexible adaptation in which risk and uncertainty are always present. However, resilience or the ability to adapt to adverse situations is a quality that can only be adequately analyzed within the complex etiological triangle of human behavior. Resilience is an exercise in which biology, culture, and environment establish the framework that enables or frustrates its success. Resilience is a relational and ambivalent dynamic process in which people are both passive and active subjects. Overcoming adversity means ceasing to be who we were and becoming different people. Therefore, resilience calls in question the sameness approach to human beings. This complexity of resilience always requires an integrated interdisciplinary approach that accounts for human reality. The most important conclusion is that resilience is a useful concept as long as it is sufficiently rooted in a realistic anthropological model such as the one I will try to develop throughout the article. | |
| dc.description.department | Depto. de Sociología Aplicada | |
| dc.description.faculty | Fac. de Educación | |
| dc.description.refereed | TRUE | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Comunidad de Madrid | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Universidad Complutense de Madrid | |
| dc.description.status | pub | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.22545/2022/00191 | |
| dc.identifier.essn | 1949-0569 | |
| dc.identifier.officialurl | https://doi.org/10.22545/2022/00191 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/105191 | |
| dc.issue.number | 3 | |
| dc.journal.title | Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.page.final | 13 | |
| dc.page.initial | 1 | |
| dc.relation.projectID | PR65/19-22435 | |
| dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International | en |
| dc.rights.accessRights | open access | |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ | |
| dc.subject.cdu | 159.928.22 | |
| dc.subject.cdu | 159.923.2 | |
| dc.subject.cdu | 165.7"19/20" | |
| dc.subject.cdu | 1 | |
| dc.subject.cdu | 303.4 | |
| dc.subject.cdu | 316 | |
| dc.subject.cdu | 37.015.3 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | Resilience | |
| dc.subject.keyword | Adversity | |
| dc.subject.keyword | Etiological triangle | |
| dc.subject.keyword | Social actor | |
| dc.subject.keyword | Ego multiplicity | |
| dc.subject.keyword | Sameness | |
| dc.subject.keyword | Resiliencia | |
| dc.subject.keyword | Adversidad | |
| dc.subject.keyword | Triángulo etiológico | |
| dc.subject.keyword | Social actor | |
| dc.subject.keyword | Multiplicidad del ego | |
| dc.subject.keyword | Igualdad | |
| dc.subject.ucm | Ciencias Sociales | |
| dc.subject.ucm | Psicología social (Psicología) | |
| dc.subject.ucm | Psicología de la educación (Psicología) | |
| dc.subject.ucm | Investigación social | |
| dc.subject.ucm | Filosofía | |
| dc.subject.unesco | 63 Sociología | |
| dc.subject.unesco | 61 Psicología | |
| dc.title | Limits and Possibilities of Resilience as a Psycho-Sociological Strategic Game: an Interdisciplinary Approach | |
| dc.type | journal article | |
| dc.type.hasVersion | VoR | |
| dc.volume.number | 13 | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | e33701c4-2b7f-4001-acbe-443775a4c023 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | e33701c4-2b7f-4001-acbe-443775a4c023 |
Download
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
