Dysexecutive Questionnaire (DEX): Unrestricted structural analysis in large clinical and non-clinical samples
Loading...
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication date
2014
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Citation
Pedrero Pérez, E.J., Ruiz Sánchez de León, J.M. & Winpenny Tejedor, C. (2015). Dysexecutive Questionnaire (DEX): Unrestricted structural analysis in large clinical and non-clinical samples. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 25(6), 879-894.
Abstract
Objective: The factorial structure of the Dysexecutive Questionnaire (DEX) is an unresolved issue in scientific literature. One-to-five-factor solutions have been found in several studies by applying different research methods. Only a few of these studies used appropriate analysis procedures to suit a Likert scale type of answer or investigated large enough samples to ensure the stability of factorial solutions. Method: The present study examines a sample of 2151 subjects, out of which 1482 formed part of the general population and 669 were taken out of a clinical population. An unrestricted factorial analysis was carried out on both samples. Results: the results unequivocally point to a single-factor solution in both samples. This means that only one latent variable is displayed in the DEX, which accounts for symptoms of oversight malfunction in activities of daily living. Conclusions: The diversity of results previously obtained in other studies may be due to using research methods that depict Likert–type scales on a continuum when they are actually ordinal categorical measures. In conclusion, the DEX should be considered a screening test that reports symptoms of prefrontal malfunction, although it is unable to specify what areas or functions have been affected, as previous studies have claimed.