Aviso: para depositar documentos, por favor, inicia sesión e identifícate con tu cuenta de correo institucional de la UCM con el botón MI CUENTA UCM. No emplees la opción AUTENTICACIÓN CON CONTRASEÑA
 

Bibliometric Rankings of Journals Based on the Thomson Reuters Citations Database

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorChang, Chia-Lin
dc.contributor.authorMcAleer, Michael
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-18T10:25:32Z
dc.date.available2023-06-18T10:25:32Z
dc.date.issued2015-03
dc.descriptionThe authors are grateful for the helpful comments and suggestions of the Editor-in-Chief. For financial support, the first author wishes to thank the National Science Council, Taiwan, and the second author acknowledges the Australian Research Council, the National Science Council, Taiwan, and the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.
dc.description.abstractVirtually all rankings of journals are based on citations, including self citations by journals and individual academics. The gold standard for bibliometric rankings based on citations data is the widely-used Thomson Reuters Web of Science (2014) citations database, which publishes, among others, the celebrated Impact Factor. However, there are numerous bibliometric measures, also known as research assessment measures, based on the Thomson Reuters citations database, but they do not all seem to have been collected in a single source. The purpose of this paper is to present, define and compare the 16 most well-known Thomson Reuters bibliometric measures in a single source. It is important that the existing bibliometric measures be presented in any rankings papers as alternative bibliometric measures based on the Thomson Reuters citations database can and do produce different rankings, as has been documented in a number of papers in the bibliometrics literature.
dc.description.facultyFac. de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales
dc.description.facultyInstituto Complutense de Análisis Económico (ICAE)
dc.description.refereedFALSE
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Science Council, Taiwan
dc.description.sponsorshipAustralian Research Council
dc.description.sponsorshipJapan Society for the Promotion of Science
dc.description.statusunpub
dc.eprint.idhttps://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/34135
dc.identifier.issn2341-2356
dc.identifier.relatedurlhttps://www.ucm.es/icae
dc.identifier.relatedurlhttps://www.ucm.es/fundamentos-analisis-economico2/documentos-de-trabajo-del-icae
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/27531
dc.issue.number15
dc.language.isoeng
dc.page.total14
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDocumentos de Trabajo del Instituto Complutense de Análisis Económico (ICAE)
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.subject.jelC18
dc.subject.jelC81
dc.subject.jelY10
dc.subject.keywordResearch assessment measures
dc.subject.keywordImpact factors
dc.subject.keywordBibliometric measures.
dc.subject.ucmEconometría (Economía)
dc.subject.unesco5302 Econometría
dc.titleBibliometric Rankings of Journals Based on the Thomson Reuters Citations Database
dc.typetechnical report
dc.volume.number2015
dcterms.referencesBergstrom C. (2007), Eigenfactor: Measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journals, C&RL News, 68, 314-316. Bergstrom, C.T. and. J.D. West (2008), Assessing citations with the Eigenfactor™ metrics, Neurology, 71, 1850–1851. Bergstrom, C.T., J.D. West and M.A. Wiseman (2008), The Eigenfactor™ metrics, Journal of Neuroscience, 28(45), 11433–11434 (November 5, 2008). Chang, C.-L. and M. McAleer (2012), Citations and impact of ISI tourism and hospitality journals, Tourism Management Perspectives, 1(1), 2-8. Chang, C.-L. and M. McAleer (2013a), Ranking journal quality by harmonic mean of ranks: An application to ISI Statistics & Probability, Statistica Neerlandica, 67(1), 27-53. Chang, C.-L. and M. McAleer (2013b), What do experts know about forecasting journal quality? A comparison with ISI research impact in finance, Annals of Financial Economics, 8(1), 1-30. Chang, C.-L. and M. McAleer (2013c), Ranking leading econometrics journals using citations data from ISI and RePEc, Econometrics, 1, 217-235. Chang, C.-L. and M. McAleer (2014a), Quality weighted citations versus total citations in the sciences and social sciences, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper 14-023/III, Tinbergen Institute , The Netherlands. Chang, C.-L. and M. McAleer (2014b), Ranking economics and econometrics ISI journals by quality weighted citations, Review of Economics, 65(1), 35-52. Chang, C.-L. and M. McAleer (2014c), How should journal quality be ranked? An application to agricultural, energy, environmental and resource economics, Journal of Reviews on Global Economics, 3, 33-47. Chang, C.-L. and M. McAleer (2015), Quality weighted citations versus total citations in the sciences and social sciences, with an application to finance and accounting, to appear in Managerial Finance. Chang, C.-L., E. Maasoumi and M. McAleer (2014), Robust ranking of journal quality: An application to economics, to appear in Econometric Reviews. (DOI:10.1080/07474938.2014.956639, posted online 3 September 2014) Chang, C.-L., M. McAleer and L. Oxley (2011a), Great expectatrics: Great papers, great journals, great econometrics, Econometric Reviews, 30(6), 583-619. Chang, C.-L., M. McAleer and L. Oxley (2011b), What makes a great journal great in economics? The singer not the song, Journal of Economic Surveys, 25(2), 326-361. Chang, C.-L., M. McAleer and L. Oxley (2011c), What makes a great journal great in the sciences? Which came first, the chicken or the egg?, Scientometrics, 87(1), 17-40. Chang, C.-L., M. McAleer and L. Oxley (2011d), How are journal impact, prestige and article influence related? An application to neuroscience, Journal of Applied Statistics, 38(11), 2563-2573. Chang, C.-L., M. McAleer and L. Oxley (2013), Coercive journal self citations, impact factor, journal influence and article influence, Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 93, 190-197. Hirsch, J.E. (2005), An index to quantify an individual‟s scientific research output, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569-15572 (November 15, 2005). Thomson Reuters Web of Science (2014), Journal Citation Reports, Essential Science Indicators, Thomson Reuters.
dspace.entity.typePublication

Download

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1515.pdf
Size:
246.25 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
downoload Download

Collections

Documentos de trabajo e informes técnicos