Implementation of endoscopic submucosal dissection in a country with a low incidence of gastric cancer: Results from a prospective national registry

dc.contributor.authorFernández-Esparrach, G.
dc.contributor.authorMarín Gabriel, José Carlos
dc.contributor.authorHerreros De Tejada López, Albe
dc.contributor.authorAlbéniz, E.
dc.contributor.authorNogales, O.
dc.contributor.authordel Pozo-García, A.J.
dc.contributor.authorRosón, P.J.
dc.contributor.authorGoicotxea, U.
dc.contributor.authorUchima, H.
dc.contributor.authorTerán, A.
dc.contributor.authorAlberto, A.
dc.contributor.authorJoaquín, R.S.
dc.contributor.authorLiseth, R.S.
dc.contributor.authorJosé, S.
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-19T11:04:02Z
dc.date.available2026-01-19T11:04:02Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become the treatment of choice for early gastric malignancies. In recent years, the ESD technique has been implemented in Western countries with increasing use. Objectives: To describe the results of gastric ESD in a Western country with a low incidence of gastric cancer. Patients and Methods: The prospective national registry was conducted over 4 years in 23 hospitals, including 30 endoscopists. Epithelial and subepithelial lesions (SEL) qualified to complete removal with ESD were assessed. The technique, instruments, and solution for submucosal injection varied at the endoscopist's discretion. ESD was defined as difficult when: en-bloc resection was not achieved, had to be converted to a hybrid resection, lasted more than 2 h or an intraprocedural perforation occurred. Additionally, independent risk factors for difficult ESD were analyzed. Results: Two hundred and thirty gastric ESD in 225 patients were performed from January 2016 to December 2019 (196 epithelial and 34 SEL). Most lesions were located in the lower stomach (111; 48.3%). One hundred and twenty-eight (55.6%) ESD were considered difficult. The median procedure time was 105 min (interquartile range [IQR]: 60–150). The procedure time for SEL was shorter than for epithelial lesions (90 min [45–121] vs. 110 min [62–160]; p = 0.038). En-bloc, R0, and curative resection rates were 91.3%, 75.2%, and 70.9%, respectively. Difficult ESD had lower R0 resection rates than ESD that did not meet the difficulty criteria (64.8% and 87.6%; p = 0.000, respectively). Fibrosis and poor maneuverability were independent factors associated with difficult ESD (OR 3.6, 95%CI 1.1–11.74 and OR 5.07, 95%CI 1.6–16.08; respectively). Conclusions: Although the number of cases is limited, the results of this analysis show acceptable en-bloc and R0 rates in gastric ESD considering the wide variability in experience among the operators. Fibrosis and poor maneuverability were associated with more difficulty in completing ESD.
dc.description.departmentDepto. de Medicina
dc.description.facultyFac. de Medicina
dc.description.refereedTRUE
dc.description.statuspub
dc.identifier.citationFernández‐Esparrach G, Marín‐Gabriel J, De Tejada AH, Albéniz E, Nogales O, Del Pozo‐García AJ, et al. Implementation of endoscopic submucosal dissection in a country with a low incidence of gastric cancer: Results from a prospective national registry. UEG Journal 2021;9:718–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/ueg2.12101.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/ueg2.12101
dc.identifier.officialurlhttps://doi.org/10.1002/ueg2.12101
dc.identifier.relatedurlhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ueg2.12101
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/130542
dc.issue.number6
dc.journal.titleUnited European Gastroenterology Journal
dc.language.isoeng
dc.page.final726
dc.page.initial718
dc.publisherWiley
dc.rights.accessRightsrestricted access
dc.subject.ucmGastroenterología y hepatología
dc.subject.unesco3205.03 Gastroenterología
dc.titleImplementation of endoscopic submucosal dissection in a country with a low incidence of gastric cancer: Results from a prospective national registry
dc.typejournal article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number9
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication79847102-a4cf-4d5e-ac4e-6fbb37ca00b3
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationde859270-d598-4c97-b62e-a218306f9cb8
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery79847102-a4cf-4d5e-ac4e-6fbb37ca00b3

Download

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
DSE_gástrica_Fdez-Esparrach_Marín_UEGJ2021.pdf
Size:
555.71 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections