Aviso: para depositar documentos, por favor, inicia sesión e identifícate con tu cuenta de correo institucional de la UCM con el botón MI CUENTA UCM. No emplees la opción AUTENTICACIÓN CON CONTRASEÑA
 

Decontamination of biofilm-contaminated implant surfaces: An in vitro evaluation

dc.contributor.authorIchioka, Yuki
dc.contributor.authorVirto Ruiz, Leire
dc.contributor.authorNuevo, Paula
dc.contributor.authorGamonal, Juan Daniel
dc.contributor.authorDerks, Jan
dc.contributor.authorLarsson, Lena
dc.contributor.authorSanz, Mariano
dc.contributor.authorBerglundh, Tord
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-11T11:03:39Z
dc.date.available2024-01-11T11:03:39Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the cleaning efficacy of two mechanical and two chemical protocols in the decontamination of implant surfaces. Methods: In total, 123 commercially available implants were mounted in plastic models mimicking peri-implant circumferential intra-bony defects. A multispecies biofilm was grown on implant surfaces. Mechanical (air-polishing (AP), rotating titanium brush (TiB)) and chemical decontamination (alkaline electrolyzed water, N-acetyl-L-cysteine) protocols were used. Cleaning efficacy in terms of residual biofilm area, chemical surface properties, and bacterial counts were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, and quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Results: Surface decontamination protocols including use of an AP device or a rotating TiB were superior in terms of biofilm removal and in reducing atomic% of Carbon on implant surfaces when compared to methods restricted to wiping with gauze. The use of chemical agents as adjuncts to the mechanical cleaning protocols provided no relevant overall benefit over saline. No treatment modality, however, resulted in complete biofilm removal. Conclusion: Air-polishing and rotating TiB were more effective implant surface decontamination protocols than wiping with gauzes. Use of chemical agents did not improve cleaning efficacy
dc.description.departmentDepto. de Anatomía y Embriología
dc.description.facultyFac. de Óptica y Optometría
dc.description.refereedTRUE
dc.description.sponsorshipTUA research funding
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversity of Gothenburg and the National Microscopy Infrastructure
dc.description.statusinpress
dc.identifier.citation: Ichioka, Y., Virto, L., Nuevo, P., Gamonal, J. D., Derks, J., Larsson, L., Sanz, M., & Berglundh, T. (2023). Decontamination of biofilm-contaminated implant surfaces: An in vitro evaluation. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 00, 1–15.
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/clr.14136
dc.identifier.essn1600-0501
dc.identifier.officialurlhttps://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14136
dc.identifier.relatedurlhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/clr.14136
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/92487
dc.journal.titleClinical Oral Implants Research
dc.language.isoeng
dc.page.final15
dc.page.initial1
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons Ltd
dc.relation.projectIDTUAGBG-966128
dc.relation.projectIDNMI (VR-RFI 2016-00968)
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject.cdu611.95
dc.subject.keywordchemical cleaning; decontamination; dental implant; mechanical instrumentation; peri-implantitis
dc.subject.ucmAnatomía
dc.subject.unesco2410.02 Anatomía Humana
dc.titleDecontamination of biofilm-contaminated implant surfaces: An in vitro evaluation
dc.typejournal article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication2bbceacb-841f-4572-81a1-d4ebc3aa9329
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery2bbceacb-841f-4572-81a1-d4ebc3aa9329

Download

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Clinical Oral Implants Res - 2023 - Ichioka.pdf
Size:
12.29 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections