Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasonography for Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis
Loading...
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication date
2024
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Mary Ann Liebert
Citation
López-Moral M, García-Madrid M, Molines-Barroso RJ, García-Álvarez Y, Álvaro-Afonso FJ, Lázaro-Martínez JL. Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasonography for Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2024 Apr;13(4):167-175. doi: 10.1089/wound.2023.0135
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to analyze the potential diagnostic capability of ultrasonography (US) in detecting diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) in patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). Approach: A 1-year prospective study was conducted on 47 consecutive patients with active DFUs and suspicion of DFO at a specialized diabetic foot unit. The following ultrasonographic features were evaluated at baseline: (1) periosteal reaction; (2) periosteal elevation; (3) cortical disruption; (4) sequestrum; and (5) positive power Doppler. The primary outcome measure aimed to establish the effectiveness of ultrasonographic features compared with aseptic bone culture for diagnosing DFO. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were utilized to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ultrasonographic features. Sample size could not be determined as it is the first study to assess ultrasonographic features for the diagnosis of DFO. The research adhered to the guidelines for diagnostic accuracy studies (Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies [STARD] 2015). Results: All patients (n = 24) diagnosed with DFO exhibited positive power Doppler, resulting in a sensitivity (S) and specificity (SP) of 1 and an area under the curve (AUC) of 1 (p < 0.001 [1-1]). Cortical disruption was present in 23 patients (95.8%) with DFO, yielding an S of 0.93, SP of 1, and AUC of 0.96 (p < 0.001 [0.88-1]). Innovation: It validates the diagnostic value of US for DFO as it is the first and largest study of its kind to establish a clear reference standard to guide clinician decision-making. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the effectiveness of cortical disruption and positive power Doppler in assessing DFO through US.











