Aviso: para depositar documentos, por favor, inicia sesión e identifícate con tu cuenta de correo institucional de la UCM con el botón MI CUENTA UCM. No emplees la opción AUTENTICACIÓN CON CONTRASEÑA
 

An exploratory study about patterns of parental home literacy activities during the COVID-19 confinement among spanish families

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Full text at PDC

Publication date

2021

Advisors (or tutors)

Editors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Routledge
Citations
Google Scholar

Citation

López-Escribano, C., Escudero, A., & Pérez-López, R. (2021). An ExploratorStudy about Patterns of Parental Home Literacy Activities during the COVID-19 Confinement among Spanish Families. Early Education and Development, 32(6), 812–829. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2021.1916184

Abstract

Research Findings: The COVID-19 pandemic is leading to an unprecedented crisis worldwide. With schools closed, the frequency with which Spanish parents engage in home literacy activities with their children between the ages of 2 and 8 and the sociodemographic variables that influence this collaboration are unknown. The present research aimed to understand interactions among parents and children in the context of literacy activities at home. A total of 337 Spanish parents completed the Home Literacy Activities Questionnaire (HLAQ). Results from the reliability test showed a good adequacy and consistency (Cronbach’s alpha.85), and a factorial analysis indicated all items could be grouped into four factors: reading activities, writing activities, digital literacy activities, and dialogic-creative literacy activities. A latent class cluster analysis, based on parents’ factorial scores in the HLAQ and their sociodemographic data, suggested four discrete parental clusters: parents prioritizing writing activities, interested in practicing all type of literacy activities, willing to do digital activities, or ready to practice dialogic-creative literacy activities. All indicators and sociodemographic characteristics–the children’s age, the number of children in the family, and the parents’ educational level–were significant and discriminated among the parental clusters. The activities carried out with least frequency were dialogic-creative literacy activities and digital literacy activities. Practice or Policy: Schools, as well as researchers, must be intentional about engaging families who may not be aware of certain activities to support their young children’s literacy skills, in times of crisis, for all children and families, for specific groups of families and children, and at varying grade levels.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Description

Referencias bibliográficas: • American Academy of Pediatrics. (2016). Media and young minds. Pediatrics, 138 (5), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-2591 • Aram, D., & Levin, I., (2014). Promoting early literacy: The differential effects of parent-child joint writing and joint storybook reading interventions. In R., Chen (Ed.), Psychology research progress. Cognitive development: Theories, stages and processes and challenges (pp. 189–212). Nova Science Publishers. • Arndt, P. A., (2016). Computer usage for learning how to read and write in primary school. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 5 (3), 90–98. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2016.07.003 • Blake, J., (1981). Family size and the quality of children. Demography, 18 (4), 421–442. https://doi.org/10.2307/2060941 • Bornstein, M. H., (2015). Children’s parents. In M. H., Bornstein, T., Leventhal, & R. M., Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science: Ecological settings and processes (pp. 55–132). John Wiley. • Burns, M. S., Griffin, P., & Snow, C. E., (1999). Starting out right: A guide to promoting children’s reading success. Specific recommendations from America’s leading researchers on how to help children become successful readers. National Academy Press. • Bus, A. G., Neuman, S. B., & Roskos, K., (2020). Screens, apps, and digital books for young children: The promise of multimedia. AERA Open, 6 (1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858420901494 • Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M., (Eds). (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. Routledge. • Dore, R. A., Hassinger-Das, B., Brezack, N., Valladares, T. L., Paller, A., Vu, L., Golinkoff, R. M., & Hirsh-Pasek, K., (2018). The parent advantage in fostering children’s e-book comprehension. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 44(3), 24–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2018.02.002 • Elimelech, A., & Aram, D., (2019). Using a digital spelling game for promoting alphabetic knowledge of preschoolers: The contribution of auditory and visual supports. Reading Research Quaterly, 55 (2), 235–250. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.264 • Fernández-Freire, L., Rodríguez-Ruiz, B., & Martínez-González, R. A., (2019). Padres y madres ante las tareas escolares: La visión del profesorado [Parents and homework: The teachers’ perspective]. Aula Abierta, 48 (1), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.17811/rifie.48.1.2019.77-84 • Galvez-Nieto, J. L., García, J. A., Vera-Bachmann, D., Trizano-Hermosilla, I., & Polanco, K., (2020). Análisis de clases latentes multinivel del clima escolar: Factores individuales, familiares y comunitarios [Multilevel latent class cluster analysis of school climate: Individual, familiy and comunity factors]. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 25 (2), 85–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicod.2020.01.001 • García, J. A., (2016). Market segmentation based on time use: An empirical analysis in the historic city of Toledo, Spain. Current Issues in Tourism, 19 (2), 155–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2013.842205 • García, J. A., (2017). Time use patterns of Spanish people at weekends: In search of what, who and when. Leisure Studies, 36 (6), 793–810. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2016.1252786 • Gassó Pérez-Portabella, N., (2020, March 16). 21 ideas creativas (y educativas) para hacer con los niños y niñas en casa [21 creative (and educational) ideas todo with children at home]. El Diario de la Educación. https://bit.ly/3ic9JzM • Hoel, T., & Tønnessen, E. S., (2019). Organizing shared digital reading in groups: Optimizing the affordances of text and medium. AERA Open, 5 (4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419883822 • Hood, M., Conlon, E., & Andrews, G., (2008). Preschool home literacy practices and children’s literacy development: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100 (2), 252–271. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.252 • Iacovou, M., (2008). Family size, birth order, and educational attainment. Marriage and Family Review, 42 (3), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.1300/J002v42n03_03 • Ihmeideh, F. M., (2014). The effect of electronic books on enhancing emergent literacy skills of pre-school children. Computers and Education, 79(10), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.07.008 • Inoue, T., Manolitis, G., De Jong, P. F., Landerl, K., Parrila, R., & Georgiou, G., (2020). Home literacy environment and early literacy development across languages varying in orthographic consistency. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(1923), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01923 • Jewitt, C., (2013). Multimodal methods for researching digital technologies. In S., Price, C., Jewitt, & B., Brown (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of digital technology research (pp. 250–266). SAGE Publising. • Jung, E., (2016). The development of reading skills in kindergarten influence of parental beliefs about school readiness, family activities, and children’s attitudes to school. International Journal of Early Childhood, 48 (1), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-016-0156-2 • Keller, K., Troesch, L. M., & Grob, A., (2015). First-born siblings show better second language skills than later born siblings. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(705), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00705 • Klop, D., Marais, L., Msindwana, A., & De Wet, F., (2018). Learning new words from an interactive electronic storybook intervention. South African Journal of Communication Disorders, 65 (1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajcd.v65i1.601 • Korat, O., Levin, I., Atishkin, S., & Turgeman, M., (2014). E-book as facilitator of vocabulary acquisition: Support of adults, dynamic dictionary and static dictionary. Reading and Writing, 27 (4), 613–629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9474-z • Leppänen, U., Niemi, P., Aunola, K., & Nurmi, J. E., (2004). Development of reading skills among preschool and primary school pupils. Reading Research Quarterly, 39 (1), 72–93. https://doi.org/10.1598/rrq.39.1.5 • Levy, B. A., Gong, Z., Hessels, S., Evans, M. A., & Jared, D., (2006). Understanding print: Early reading development and the contributions of home literacy experiences. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 93 (1), 63–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2005.07.003 • Liu, C., Georgiou, G. K., & Manolitsis, G., (2018). Modeling the relationships of parents’ expectations, family’s SES, and home literacy environment with emergent literacy skills and word reading in Chinese. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 43(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2017.11.001 • Marsh, J., (2004). The techno-literacy practices of young children. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 2 (1), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X0421003 • Marsh, J., Plowman, L., Yamada-Rice, D., Bishop, J. C., Lahmar, J., Scott, F., Davenport, A., Davis, S., French, K., Piras, M., Thornhill, S., Robinson, P., & Winter, P., (2015). Exploring play and creativity in pre-schoolers’ use of apps: Final project report. Technology and play. University of Sheffield. http://www.techandplay.org/reports/TAP_Final_Report.pdf • Martín, E., Rodríguez, V., & Marchesi, A., (2005). La opinión de los profesores sobre la convivencia en los centros [Teachers opinions in cohabitation in schools]. Centro de innovación educativa (CIE-FUHEM) and Instituto de Evaluación y Asesoramiento (IDEA). https://bit.ly/2PqPrGv • McBride-Chang, C., (2012). Shared-book reading: There is no downside for parents. In S., Suggate & E., Reese (Eds.), Contemporary debates in childhood education and development (pp. 52–58). Routledge. • Meoded Karabanov, G., & Aram, D., (2020, June). Literacy activities with preschool children in the digital home environment and children’s early literacy [Paper presentation]. Society for Scientific Studies of Reading Annual Conference, Los Angeles, CA. • Miller, E. B., & Warschauer, M., (2014). Young children and e-reading: Research to date and questions for the future. Learning, Media and Technology, 39 (3), 283–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.867868 • Ministerial Order SND/535/2020. Agencia Estatal Boletín Oficial del Estado. Gobierno de Esapaña. Retrieved June 17, 2020, from https://bit.ly/3fvj1Fr • Ministry of Education and Professional Training. (2020). #Aprendoencasa [#Ilearnathome]. Author. https://aprendoencasa.educacion.es • Mol, S. E., Bus, A. G., De Jong, M. T., & Smeets, D. J. H., (2008). Added value of dialogic parent-child book readings: A meta-analysis. Early Education and Development, 19 (1), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409280701838603 • Neumann, M. M., & Neumann, D. L., (2017). The use of touch-screen tablets at home and pre-school to foster emergent literacy. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 17 (2), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798415619773 • Niklas, F., & Schneider, W., (2013). Home literacy environment and the beginning of reading and spelling. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38 (1), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2012.10.001 • Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). The assessment of reliability. In Psychometric theory (3rd ed., pp. 248–292). McGraw-Hill, Inc. • Oberski, D., (2016). Mixture models: Latent profile and latent class analysis. In J., Robertson & M., Kaptein (Eds.), Modern statistical methods for HCI (pp. 275–287). Springer. • Oppewal, H., Paas, L. J., Crouch, G. I., & Huybers, T., (2010). Segmenting consumers based on how they spend a tax rebate: An analysis of the Australian stimulus payment. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31 (4), 510–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2010.03.013 • Pan American Health Organization & World Health Organization. (2020). Consejos para el público sobre la enfermedad por coronavirus (COVID-19): Crianza saludable [Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) advice for the public: Advocacy]. Author. https://bit.ly/3kchx6x • Park, H., (2008). Public policy and the effect of sibship size on educational achievement: A comparative study of 20 countries. Social Science Research, 37 (3), 874–887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2008.03.002 • Plowman, L., McPake, J., & Stephen, C., (2008). Just picking it up? Young children learning with technology at home. Cambridge Journal of Education, 38 (3), 303–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640802287564 • Plowman, L., Stevenson, O., Stephen, C., & McPake, J., (2012). Preschool children’s learning with technology at home. Computers & Education, 59 (1), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.11.014 • Pomerantz, E. M., Moorman, E. A., & Litwack, S. D., (2007). The how, whom, and why of parents’ involvement in children’s academic lives: More is not always better. Review of Educational Research, 77 (3), 373–410. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430305567 • Reich, S. M., Yau, J. C., & Warschauer, M., (2016). Tablet-based ebooks for young children: What does the research say? Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 37 (7), 585–591. https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000335 • Rideout, V., (2013). Zero to Eight. Children’s media use in Amarica 2013. Common Sense Media. • Rideout, V., (2014). Learning at home: Families’ educational media use in America. The Joan Ganz Cooney Center. • Rideout, V., (2017). The common sense census: Media use by kids age zero to eight. Common Sense Media. • Rowe, M. L., (2013). A longitudinal investigation of the role of quantity and quality of child-directed speech in vocabulary development. Child Development, 83 (5), 1762–1774. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01805.x • Royal Decree, 463/2020. Agencia Estatal Boletín Oficial del Estado. Gobierno de España. Retrieved March 14, 2020, from https://bit.ly/33AAidQ • Salmon, L. G., (2014). Factors that affect emergent literacy development when engaging with electronic books. Early Childhood Education Journal, 42 (2), 85–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-013-0589-2 • Schaub, M., (2015). Is there a home advantage in school readiness for young children? Trends in parent engagement in cognitive activities with young children, 1991–2001. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 13 (1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X12468122 • Sénéchal, M., (2006). Testing the home literacy model: Parent involvement in kindergarten is differentially related to grade 4 reading comprehension, fluency, spelling, and reading for pleasure. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10 (1), 59–87. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr1001_4 • Sénéchal, M., Whissell, J., & Bildfell, A., (2017). Starting from home: Home literacy practices that make a difference. In K., Cain, D. L., Compton, & R. K., Parrilla (Eds.), Theories of reading development (pp. 383–408). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/swll.15.22sen • Sénéchal, M., & Lefevre, J. A., (2014). Continuity and change in the home literacy environment as predictors of growth in vocabulary and reading. Child Development, 85 (4), 1552–1568. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12222 • Sénéchal, M., & LeFevre, J. A., (2002). Parental involvement in the development of children’s reading skill: A five-year longitudinal study. Child Development, 73 (2), 445–460. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00417 • Sénéchal, M., & Young, L., (2008). The effect of family literacy interventions on children’s acquisition of reading from kindergarten to grade 3: A meta-analytic review. Review of Educational Research, 78 (4), 880–907. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308320319 • Silinskas, G., Lerkkanen, M. K., Tolvanen, A., Niemi, P., Poikkeus, A. M., & Nurmi, J. E., (2012). The frequency of parents’ reading-related activities at home and children’s reading skills during kindergarten and Grade 1. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 33 (6), 302–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2012.07.004 • Silinskas, G., Parrila, R., Lerkkanen, M. K., Poikkeus, A. M., Niemi, P., & Nurmi, J. E., (2010). Mothers’ reading-related activities at home and learning to read during kindergarten. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 25 (2), 243–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-010-0014-9 • Silinskas, G., Sénéchal, M., Torppa, M., & Lerkkanen, M., (2020). Home literacy activities and children ’ s reading skills, independent reading, and interest in literacy activities from Kindergarten to Grade 2. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(1508), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01508 • Silinskas, G., Torppa, M., Lerkkanen, M. K., & Nurmi, J. E., (2020). The home literacy model in a highly transparent orthography. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 31 (1), 80–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2019.1642213 • Sonnenschein, S., & Munsterman, K., (2002). The influence of home-based reading interactions on 5-year-olds’ reading motivations and early literacy development. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 17 (3), 318–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2006(02)00167-9 • Stephen, C., Stevenson, O., & Adey, C., (2013). Young children engaging with technologies at home: The influence of family context. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 11 (2), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X12466215 • Strauss, G. A., & Ganea, P. A., (2017). A print book preference: Caregivers report higher child enjoyment and more adult-child interactions when reading print than electronic books. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 12(2), 8–15. https//doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2017.02.001 • Tang, J., Hallam, R. A., & Sawyer-Morris, G., (2020). Preschool parents’ perceptions of early care and education arrangements: A latent profile analysis. Early Education and Development, 32 (1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2020.1774280 • Torppa, M., Poikkeus, A. M., Laakso, M. L., Eklund, K., & Lyytinen, H., (2006). Predicting delayed letter knowledge development and its relation to grade 1 reading achievement among children with and without familial risk for dyslexia. Developmental Psychology, 42 (6), 1128–1142. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.42.6.1128 • Van Kleeck, A., & Schuele, M., (2010). Historical perspective on literacy in early childhood. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19 (4), 341–355. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2010/09-0038) • Van Steensel, R., Herppich, S., McElvany, N., & Kurvers, J., (2011). How effective are family literacy programs for children’s literacy skills? A review of the meta-analytic evidence. Review of Educational Research, 81 (1), 69–96. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310388819 • Van Voorgis, F. L., Maier, M. F., Epstein, J. L., & Lloyd, C. L., (2013). The impact of family involvement on the education of children ages 3 to 8. A focus on literacy and math achievement outcomes and socio-emotional skills. MDRC. Building Knowledge to Improve Social Policy. • Vicente-Fernández, P., Vinader-Segura, R., & Puebla-Martínez, B., (2020). Padres ante el desafío educativo en situación de confinamiento comparativo entre Educación Infantil y Educación Primaria [Parents facing the educational challenge in a situation of confinement: A comparative analysis between preeschol education and primary education]. Revista de Estilos de Aprendizaje, 13(27), 56–67. https://revistaestilosdeaprendizaje.com/article/view/2654 • Wedel, M., & Kamakura, W. A., (2000). Market segmentation: Conceptual and methodological foundations (2nd ed.). Kluwer Academic. • Whalon, K., Hanline, M. F., & Davis, J., (2016). Parent implementation of RECALL: A systematic case study. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 51 (2), 211–220. https://bit.ly/3kAfgSU • Yeung, S. S., & Savage, R., (2020). Teaching grapheme–phoneme correspondences using a direct mapping approach for at-risk second language learners: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 53 (2), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219419894563 • Zhou, N., & Yadav, A., (2017). Effects of multimedia story reading and questioning on preschoolers’ vocabulary learning, story comprehension and reading engagement. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65 (6), 1523–1545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9533-2 • Zipke, M., (2017). Preschoolers explore interactive storybook apps: The effect on word recognition and story comprehension. Education and Information Technologies, 22 (4), 1695–1712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9513-x • Zuilkowski, S. S., McCoy, D. C., Jonason, C., & Dowd, A. J., (2019). Relationships among home literacy behaviors, materials, socioeconomic status, and early literacy outcomes across 14 Low- and middle-income countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 50 (4), 539–555. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022119837363

Keywords

Collections