Aviso: para depositar documentos, por favor, inicia sesión e identifícate con tu cuenta de correo institucional de la UCM con el botón MI CUENTA UCM. No emplees la opción AUTENTICACIÓN CON CONTRASEÑA
 

Memories of past close encounters in extreme trans-Neptunian space: Finding unseen planets using pure random searches

dc.contributor.authorFuente Marcos, Carlos de la
dc.contributor.authorFuente Marcos, Raúl de la
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-17T09:05:03Z
dc.date.available2023-06-17T09:05:03Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.descriptionDe La Fuente Marcos, C., & De La Fuente Marcos, R. (2021). Memories of past close encounters in extreme trans-neptunian space: Finding unseen planets using pure random searches. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 646 doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140311 © ESO 2021
dc.description.abstractContext. The paths followed by the known extreme trans-Neptunian objects (ETNOs) effectively avoid direct gravitational perturbations from the four giant planets, yet their orbital eccentricities are in the range between 0.69-0.97. Solar system dynamics studies show that such high values of the eccentricity can be produced via close encounters or secular perturbations. In both cases, the presence of yet-to-be-discovered trans-Plutonian planets is required. Recent observational evidence cannot exclude the existence, at 600AU from the Sun, of a planet of five Earth masses. Aims. If the high eccentricities of the known ETNOs are the result of relatively recent close encounters with putative planets, the mutual nodal distances of sizeable groups of ETNOs with their assumed perturber may still be small enough to be identifiable geometrically. In order to confirm or reject this possibility, we used Monte Carlo random search techniques. Methods. Two arbitrary orbits may lead to close encounters when their mutual nodal distance is sufficiently small. We generated billions of random planetary orbits with parameters within the relevant ranges and computed the mutual nodal distances with a set of randomly generated orbits with parameters consistent with those of the known ETNOs and their uncertainties. We monitored which planetary orbits had the maximum number of potential close encounters with synthetic ETNOs and we studied the resulting distributions. Results.We provide narrow ranges for the orbital parameters of putative planets that may have experienced orbit-changing encounters with known ETNOs. Some sections of the available orbital parameter space are strongly disfavored by our analysis. Conclusions. Our calculations suggest that more than one perturber is required if scattering is the main source of orbital modification for the known ETNOs. Perturbers might not be located farther than 600AU and they have to follow moderately eccentric and inclined orbits to be capable of experiencing close encounters with multiple known ETNOs.
dc.description.departmentUnidad Deptal. de Astronomía y Geodesia
dc.description.facultyFac. de Ciencias Matemáticas
dc.description.refereedTRUE
dc.description.sponsorshipMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad (MINECO)
dc.description.statuspub
dc.eprint.idhttps://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/65547
dc.identifier.doi10.1051/0004-6361/202140311
dc.identifier.issn0004-6361
dc.identifier.officialurlhttps://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361%2F202140311
dc.identifier.relatedurlhttps://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2021/02/aa40311-21/aa40311-21.html
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/8128
dc.journal.titleAstronomy & Astrophysics
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherEDP Sciences
dc.relation.projectIDESP2017-87813-R
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.subject.cdu52
dc.subject.keywordData analysis
dc.subject.keywordNumerical methods
dc.subject.keywordCelestial mechanics
dc.subject.keywordPlanets and satellites detection
dc.subject.keywordMminor planets
dc.subject.keywordAsteroids
dc.subject.keywordKuiper belt
dc.subject.ucmAstronomía (Matemáticas)
dc.subject.unesco21 Astronomía y Astrofísica
dc.titleMemories of past close encounters in extreme trans-Neptunian space: Finding unseen planets using pure random searches
dc.typejournal article
dc.volume.number646
dcterms.references1. Bailey, V., Meshkat, T., Reiter, M., et al. 2014, ApJ, 780, L4 [Google Scholar] 2. Batygin, K., & Brown, M. E. 2016, AJ, 151, 22 [Google Scholar] 3. Batygin, K., Adams, F. C., Brown, M. E., et al. 2019, Phys. Rep., 805, 1 [Google Scholar] 4. Carusi, A., Valsecchi, G. B., & Greenberg, R. 1990, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron., 49, 111 [Google Scholar] 5. de la Fuente Marcos, C., & de la Fuente Marcos, R. 2014, MNRAS, 443, L59 [Google Scholar] 6. de la Fuente Marcos, C., & de la Fuente Marcos, R. 2017, MNRAS, 471, L61 [Google Scholar] 7. de la Fuente Marcos, C., de la Fuente Marcos, R., & Aarseth, S. J. 2016, MNRAS, 460, L123 [Google Scholar] 8. de la Fuente Marcos, C., de la Fuente Marcos, R., & Aarseth, S. J. 2017, Ap&SS, 362, 198 [Google Scholar] 9. de León, J., de la Fuente Marcos, C., & de la Fuente Marcos, R. 2017, MNRAS, 467, L66 [Google Scholar] 10. Fienga, A., Di Ruscio, A., Bernus, L., et al. 2020, A&A, 640, A6 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar] 11. Freedman, D., & Diaconis, P. 1981, Prob. Theor. Relat. Fields, 57, 453 [Google Scholar] 12. Ginsburg, A., Sipőcz, B. M., Brasseur, C. E., et al. 2019, AJ, 157, 98 [Google Scholar] 13. Giorgini, J. D. 2015, IAU Gen. Assem., 22, 2256293 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar] 14. Hamilton, D. P., & Burns, J. A. 1992, Icarus, 96, 43 [Google Scholar] 15. Hunter, J. D. 2007, Comput. Sci. Eng., 9, 90 [Google Scholar] 16. Ito, T., & Ohtsuka, K. 2019, Monogr. Environ. Earth Planets, 7, 1 [Google Scholar] 17. Kaib, N. A., Pike, R., Lawler, S., et al. 2019, AJ, 158, 43 [Google Scholar] 18. Kalinicheva, O. V., & Chernetenko, Y. A. 2020, Astrophys. Bull., 75, 459 [Google Scholar] 19. Kenyon, S. J., & Bromley, B. C. 2015, ApJ, 806, 42 [Google Scholar] 20. Kenyon, S. J., & Bromley, B. C. 2016, ApJ, 825, 33 [Google Scholar] 21. Kozai, Y. 1962, AJ, 67, 591 [Google Scholar] 22. Lidov, M. L. 1962, Planet. Space Sci., 9, 719 [Google Scholar] 23. Metropolis, N., & Ulam, S. 1949, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 44, 335 [Google Scholar] 24. Milani, A., Nobili, A. M., & Carpino, M. 1989, Icarus, 82, 200 [Google Scholar] 25. Naud, M.-E., Artigau, É., Malo, L., et al. 2014, ApJ, 787, 5 [Google Scholar] 26. Nguyen, M. M., De Rosa, R. J., & Kalas, P. 2021, AJ, 161, 22 [Google Scholar] 27. Saillenfest, M. 2020, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron., 132, 12 [Google Scholar] 28. Saillenfest, M., Fouchard, M., Tommei, G., et al. 2017, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron., 129, 329 [Google Scholar] 29. Trujillo, C. A., & Sheppard, S. S. 2014, Nature, 507, 471 [Google Scholar] 30. van der Walt, S., Colbert, S. C., & Varoquaux, G. 2011, Comput. Sci. Eng., 13, 22 [Google Scholar] 31. von Zeipel, H. 1910, Astron. Nachr., 183, 345 [Google Scholar] 32. Wan, X.-S., Huang, T.-Y., & Innanen, K. A. 2001, AJ, 121, 1155 [Google Scholar]
dspace.entity.typePublication

Download

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
delafuente_memories.pdf
Size:
1.45 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections