Aviso: para depositar documentos, por favor, inicia sesión e identifícate con tu cuenta de correo institucional de la UCM con el botón MI CUENTA UCM. No emplees la opción AUTENTICACIÓN CON CONTRASEÑA
 

Costly capital reallocation and energy use

dc.contributor.authorDíaz, Antonia
dc.contributor.authorPuch González, Luis Antonio
dc.contributor.authorGuilló, María D.
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-21T01:44:46Z
dc.date.available2023-06-21T01:44:46Z
dc.date.issued2001
dc.description.abstractIn time series data, energy use does not change much with energy price changes. However, energy use is responsive to international differences in energy prices in cross-section data across countries. In this paper we consider a model of energy use in which production takes place at individual plants and capital can be used either to directly produce output or to reduce the energy required to run the planto We assume that reallocating capital from one use to another is costly. This turns out to be crucial for the quantitative properties of the model to be in conformity with the low short-mn and high long-run elasticities of energy use seen in data. Furthermore, our model displays variations in capacity utilization that are in line with those observed during the period of major oil price increases.
dc.description.abstractSe propone un modelo para demostrar que los datos de series temporales muestran que el uso de la energía responde poco a cambios en su precio, pero que, sin embargo, los datos de sección cruzada entre países muestran que el uso de la energía responde a las diferencias internacionales en su precio.
dc.description.facultyFac. de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales
dc.description.facultyInstituto Complutense de Análisis Económico (ICAE)
dc.description.refereedTRUE
dc.description.statuspub
dc.eprint.idhttps://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/6795
dc.identifier.doib19839984
dc.identifier.relatedurlhttps://www.ucm.es/icae
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/64470
dc.issue.number11
dc.language.isoeng
dc.page.total26
dc.publication.placeMadrid
dc.publisherInstituto Complutense de Análisis Económico. Universidad Complutense de Madrid
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDocumentos de trabajo del Instituto Complutense de Análisis Económico (ICAE)
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.subject.jelE22
dc.subject.jelE23
dc.subject.jelQ43
dc.subject.keywordUso de la Energía
dc.subject.keywordPrecio
dc.subject.keywordEnergy price
dc.subject.keywordEnergy use
dc.subject.keywordCostly capital reallocation
dc.subject.keywordNumber of plants
dc.subject.ucmEconomía industrial
dc.titleCostly capital reallocation and energy use
dc.typetechnical report
dc.volume.number2001
dcterms.referencesAndrew Atkeson and Patriek J. Kehoe. Models of energy use: Putty-putty versus putty-elay. American Economic Rcvicw, 80(4):1028-43, 1000. Timothy F. Bresnahan and Valerie A. Ramey. Segments shifts and eapaeity utilization in the u.s. automobile industry. American Economic Review, 83(2):213-218, 1993. T. F. Cooley and E. C. Preseott. Eeonomie growth and business eyeles. In T. F. Cooley, editor, Ji'rontiers of Business Cycle Research, chapter 1. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 199,5. Thomas F. Cooley, Gary H. Hansen, and Edward C. Prescott. Equilibrium business cyeles with idle resources and variable capacity utilization. Economic Theory, 6:3945, 1995. Steven J. Davis and John Haltiwanger. Sectoral job ereation and destruction responses to oil price changes. NBER Working Paper 7095, 1999. Mark E. Doms and Timothy Dunne. Energy intensity, electricity consumption, and advanced manufacturing technology usage. Center for Economic Studies Working Paper 93-9, U.U. Bureau of the Census, 1993. Mary G. Finn. Variance properties of solow's productivity residual and their cyelical implications. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 19(5-7):1249-81, July-September 1996. Lawrence H. Goulder. Carbon tax design and U.S. industry performance. In James M. Poterba, editor, Tax Policy and the Economy, Vol. 6, chapter 6. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992. Lawrenee H. Goulder. Energy tmws: Traditional effieieney effeets and environmental implications. NBER Working Paper 4582, 1993. Lawrence H. Goulder. Effects of carbon taxes in an economy with prior tax distortions: An intertemporal general eqllilibrillm analysis. JOUT1J.n.1 of Environmf'nto.l Economics and Management, 29(3):271-97, 1995. James D. Hamilton. A neoelassical model of unemployment and the business cyele. Journal of Political Economy, 96(3):593-617, June 1988. G. D. Hansen. Indivisible labor and the business cyele. Journal of Monetary Economics, 16:300-18, 1085. Dale W. Jorgenson and Pcter J. Wileoxen. Redueing U.S. earbon em¡ss¡ons: An econometric general equilibrium assessment. Resource and Energy Economics, 15(1):7-25, 1003. In Moo Kim and Prakash Loungani. The role of energy in real business cycle models. Journal of Monetary Economics, 29(2): 173-89, April 1992. Robert G. King and Sergio Rebelo. Transitional dynamics and economic growth in the neoclassical model. American Economic Review, 83(4):908-931, 1993. Richard G. Newell, Adam B. Jaffe, and Robert N. Stavins. The induced innovation hypothesis and energy-saving technological change. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3):941-75, 1999. Robert S. Pindyck and Julio J. Rotemberg. Dynamic factor demands and the effects of energy price shocks. American Economic Review, 73(5):1066-79, 1983. R. Rogerson. Indivisible labour lotteries and equilibrium. Journal of Monetary Economics, 21:3-16, 1988. Julio J. Rotemberg and Michael Woodford. Imperfect competition and the effects of energy price increases on economic activity. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 38(4):549-77, November 1996.
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication269b8cd4-4a3b-4c1f-981d-2590f9cc8f20
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery269b8cd4-4a3b-4c1f-981d-2590f9cc8f20

Download

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
0111.pdf
Size:
299.33 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format