Academic integrity at risk. Joan Robinson’s interpretation of Marxian Economics and her ethic critique of orthodox Economic Theory

dc.contributor.authorJiménez Contreras, Baruc
dc.description.abstractDuring the twentieth century, Joan Robinson introduced Marx’s political economy into academic discussions of economic thought. This article argues that Robinson’s work generates a proposal for academic integrity in economic ideas through an ethical vision of Marx’s discourse and an epistemic critique of orthodox economic theory. Robinson’s research shows that economic theory has been characterized by hiding the interests of the bourgeoisie, consolidating an “unethical behavior”. Following Macfarlane’s (2009) work on virtue theory, it is possible to identify in Robinson’s production virtues that can enhance the academic integrity of economists.
dc.description.abstractDurante el siglo XX, Joan Robinson introdujo la economía política de Marx en las discusiones académicas del pensamiento económico. Este artículo sostiene que el trabajo de Robinson genera una propuesta de integridad académica en la economía a través de una visión ética del discurso de Marx y una crítica epistémica de la teoría económica ortodoxa. La investigación de Robinson muestra que la teoría económica se ha caracterizado por ocultar los intereses de la burguesía, consolidando un "comportamiento poco ético". Siguiendo el trabajo de Macfarlane (2009) sobre la teoría de la virtud, es posible identificar en la producción de Robinson virtudes que pueden mejorar la integridad académica de los economistas.
dc.description.abstractDurante o século 20, Joan Robinson introduziu a economia política de Marx nas discussões acadêmicas do pensamento econômico. Este artigo argumenta que a obra de Robinson gera uma proposta de integridade acadêmica em economia por meio de uma visão ética do discurso de Marx e uma crítica epistêmica da teoria econômica ortodoxa. A pesquisa de Robinson mostra que a teoria econômica tem se caracterizado por esconder os interesses da burguesia, consolidando o “comportamento antiético”. Seguindo o trabalho de Macfarlane (2009) sobre a teoria da virtude, é possível identificar virtudes na produção de Robinson que podem melhorar a integridade acadêmica dos economistas.
dc.description.departmentDepto. de Economía Aplicada, Estructura e Historia
dc.description.facultyFac. de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales
dc.identifier.citationAn open letter to Greg Mankiw. (2012). The Critical Quarterly, 54(2), 10-11. Anscombe, G. E. M. (1958). Modern Moral Philosophy. Philosophy, 33(124), 1-19. Beauchamp, T., & Childress, J. [1979] (2013). Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford Universi-ty Press. Blosser, J. (2016). More Than Free Markets: Adam Smith and the Virtue of Responsibil-ity. Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics, 36(1), 163-179. Bretag, T. (2018). Academic Integrity. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Man-agement. Routledge. Callahan, D. (2003). Principlism and Communitarianism. Journal of Medical Ethics, 29(5), 287-291. Clouser, K. D. (1990). A critique of Principlism. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy (United Kingdom), 15(2), 219-236. 10.1093/jmp/15.2.219 Champernowne, D. G. (1936). Unemployment, Basic and Monetary: the Classical Analysis and the Keynesian. The Review of Economic Studies, 3(3), 201-216. 10.2307/2967628 Dobb, M. (1929). A Sceptical View of the Theory of Wages. The Economic Journal, 39(156), 506-519. 10.2307/2223662 Douglass, R. (2020). Bernard Mandeville on the Use and Abuse of Hypocrisy. Political Studies, 0032321720972617. 10.1177/0032321720972617 Emami, Z. (1992). History versus Equilibrium: Joan Robinson on Teaching Econo-mics. International Journal of Social Economics, 19(10), 83-94. 10.1108/EUM0000000000505 Gaido, D., & Quiroga, M. (2021). Marxism in the Age of Imperialism – the Second Internation-al. In A. Callinicos, S. Kouvelakis & L. Pradella (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Marxism and Post-Marxism (pp. 51-65). Routledge. Haakonssen, K. (1981). The Science of a Legislator: The Natural Jurisprudence of David Hume and Adam Smith. Cambridge University Press. Harrod, R. F. (1937). Mr. Keynes and Traditional Theory. Econometrica, 5(1), 74-86. 10.2307/1905402 Hicks, J. R. (1937). Mr. Keynes and the "Classics"; A Suggested Interpretation. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 147-159. Hirschman, A. O. (1977). The Passion and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism before its Triumph. Princeton Univ. Press. Kalecki, M. [1933] (1990). Essay on the Business Cycle Theory. In J. Osiatynski (Ed.), Collected Works of Michal Kalecki. Volume I. Capitalism Business Cycle and Full Employment (pp. 65-108). Oxford University Press. Kalecki, M. (1935). A Macrodynamic Theory of Business Cycles. Econometrica, 3(3), 327-344. 10.2307/1905325 Kalecki, M. (1938). The Determinants of Distribution of the National Inco-me. Econometrica, 6(2), 97-112. 10.2307/1907142 Kaye, F. B. 1922. "The Influence of Bernard Mandeville." Studies in Philology 19: 83-108. Keynes, J. M. [1936] (2018). The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and money. Springer International Publishing; Palgrave Macmillan. King, J. E. (2017). Post Keynesian Economics in Cambridge. In R. A. Cord (Ed.), The Palgrave Companion to Cambridge Economics (pp. 135-155). Palgrave Macmillan UK. 10.1057/978-1-137-41233-1_7 Macfarlane, B. (2009). Researching with Integrity: The Ethics of Academic Enquiry. Routledge. Mandeville, B. [1714] (1998). The Fable of the Bees or Private Vices, Public Benefits. Liberty Fund. Marx, K., & Engels, F. [1867] (1992a). Capital: Critique of Political Economy Volume 1. Penguin Classics. Marx, K., & Frederick, E. [1894] (1992b). Capital: Critique of Political Economy Volume 3. Penguin Classics. MacIntyre, A. (1981). After virtue. Duckworth. McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (1999). Academic Integrity in Honor Code and Non-Honor Code Environments: A Qualitative Investigation. The Journal of Higher Education, 70(2), 211-234. 10.2307/2649128 Meade, J. E. (1937). A Simplified Model of Mr Keynes' System. The Review of Economic Studies, 4(2), 98-107. 10.2307/2967607 Nuremberg Trials. [1947] (1991). The Nuremberg Code. Law, Medicine & Health Care: A Publication of the American Society of Law & Medicine, 19(3-4), 266–266. Nussbaum, M. C. (2001). Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge University Press. Ozoliņš, J. (. T. (2015). Ethical principlism. In J. T. Ozoliņš, & J. Grainger (Eds.), Foundations of healthcare ethics: Theory to practice (pp. 33-50, Chapter xviii, 283 Pages). Cambridge Uni-versity Press, New York, NY. Quddus, M., & Rashid, S. (1994). The Overuse of Mathematics in Economics: Nobel Re-sistance. Eastern Economic Journal, 20(3), 251-265. Rachels, J. (1999). The Elements of Moral Philosophy. McGraw-Hill. Reddaway, W. B. (1937). The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. Economic Record, 12(1‐2), 28-36. Robinson, J. [1933] (1969). The Economics of Imperfect Competition. St. Martim's Press. Robinson, J. (1947). Essays in The Theory of Employment. Basil Blackwell. Robinson, J. [1947] (1982). An essay on Marxian economics. Macmillan Press. Robinson, J. (1951). Introduction. In R. Luxemburg (Ed.), The Accumulation of Capital (pp. 13-28). Routledge and Kegan Paul LTD. Robinson, J. (1962). Economic Philosophy. Penguin Books. Robinson, J. (1967). Economics: An Awkward Corner. Pantheon Books. Robinson, J. [1970] (2018). Freedom and Necessity: An Introduction to the Study of Society. Routledge. Robinson, J. (1972). The Second Crisis of Economic Theory. The American Economic Re-view, 62(1), 1-10. Robinson, J. (1974). History versus Equilibrium. Indian Economic Journal, 21(3), 202. Robinson, J. (1978). The Growlery: Morality and Economics Challenge, 21(1), 62-64. 10.1080/05775132.1978.11470407 Sen, A. K. (1977). Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 6(4), 317-344. Sen, A. (1987). On Ethics and Economics. Basil Blackwell. Trincado Aznar, E. (2003). Adam Smith, crítico del utilitarismo. Telos: Revista Iberoamericana de Estudios Utilitaristas, 12(1), 43-59. Trincado Aznar, E. (2004). Crítica a la doctrina de la utilidad y revisión de las teorías de Hume, Smith y Bentham. Trincado, E. (2019). The Birth of Economic Rhetoric: Communication, Arts and Economic Stimulus in David Hume and Adam Smith. Springer International Publishing AG. United States. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1978). The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research (Ser. Dhew publication, no. (os) 78-0012-78-0014). Vivenza, G. (2001). Adam Smith and the Classics: The Classical Heritage in Adam Smith's Thought. Oxford Univ Pr. World Medical Association. [1969] (1982). The Declaration of Helsinki. World Medical Journal, 29(6), 86-8.
dc.journal.titleIberian Journal of the History of Economic Thought
dc.publisherUniversidad Complutense de Madrid
dc.rightsAtribución 3.0 España
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.subject.keywordAcademic integrity
dc.subject.keywordJoan Robinson
dc.subject.keywordPost-Keynesian economics
dc.subject.keywordKarl Marx
dc.subject.keywordOrthodox Economic Theory
dc.subject.keywordIntegridad académica
dc.subject.keywordEconomía post-keynesiana
dc.subject.keywordTeoría económica ortodoxa
dc.subject.keywordIntegridade acadêmica
dc.subject.keywordEconomia pós-keynesiana
dc.subject.keywordTeoria econômica ortodoxa
dc.subject.ucmTeorías económicas
dc.subject.unesco5307 Teoría Económica
dc.titleAcademic integrity at risk. Joan Robinson’s interpretation of Marxian Economics and her ethic critique of orthodox Economic Theory
dc.title.alternativeIntegridad académica en riesgo. La interpretación de Joan Robinson de la economía marxista y su crítica ética de la teoría económica ortodoxa
dc.title.alternativeIntegridade acadêmica em risco. A interpretação de Joan Robinson da economia marxista e sua crítica ética da teoria econômica ortodoxa
dc.typejournal article
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
356.07 KB
Adobe Portable Document Format