Edición filológica y estudio literario del Espejo de ilustres y perfectas señoras de José Rojo
Loading...
Download
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication date
2024
Defense date
27/04/2023
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Citation
Abstract
La presente tesis doctoral, titulada Edición filológica y estudio literario del Espejo de ilustres y perfectas señoras de José Rojo, busca contribuir al panorama científico e investigador a través de la aportación de la edición de dicho diálogo escrito en Madrid a finales del siglo XVII (c. 1670). En él se aborda por extenso cómo ha de ser la educación de las mujeres, la cual se articula en torno a la estructura tradicional, es decir, a través de una división tripartita que reduce la vida femenil a tres categorías: doncella (juventud), casada (madurez) y viuda (senectud).Este texto ha permanecido inédito hasta la fecha. Su transmisión fue, hasta donde se conoce, manuscrita (mss. 8802 custodiado por la Biblioteca Nacional de España). Existe, además, un segundo testimonio —aunque con otro título y sin mención a su autor, José Rojo— de la misma naturaleza (mss. 17939, también en la BNE); las conclusiones alcanzadas permiten afirmar que podría tratarse de un texto posterior. Si bien el segundo testimonio, como se detalla en el estudio filológico, puede dar lugar a cierta problemática en cuanto a la atribución, existen evidencias suficientes para confiar en la autoría de Rojo. La fechación del diálogo resulta más compleja, pues ambos manuscritos carecen de información de este tipo. Cautelarmente se ha fijado en torno a las últimas décadas del siglo XVII. Para ello se han tenido en cuenta las informaciones sobre la producción literaria del autor, así como su biografía y otros rasgos que aparecen abordados con detalle en los estudios que preceden a la edición...
This doctoral thesis, entitled Edición filológica y estudio literario del Espejo de ilustres y perfectas señoras de José Rojo, has the objective of contributing to the scientific and research community the edition of a literary dialogue written in Madrid at the end of the 17th century (c. 1670). The text explains how women should be educated. Such instruction is organised according to a traditional structure that is divided into three stages of female life: maiden (youth), married (maturity) and widow (senescence).The text has remained hitherto unpublished. According to the information preserved, it was transmitted in manuscript (mss. 8802; Biblioteca Nacional de España). There is also a second manuscript testimony, although this one has a different title and no mention of its author, José Rojo (mss. 17939, BNE). The conclusions reached allow us to affirm that this could be a later text. As explained in detail in the philological study, the second manuscript could generate certain problems of attribution; however, the evidence supporting Rojo's authorship is sufficient to reaffirm the proposal. The dating of the dialogue is a more complex question. The two manuscripts do not contain any information of this kind. Cautiously, we consider the possibility that the text belongs to the last decades of the 17th century. In order to put forward this hypothesis, we have compiled different information on the author's literary production, his biography and other features that we will analyse minutely in the studies that precede this edition...
This doctoral thesis, entitled Edición filológica y estudio literario del Espejo de ilustres y perfectas señoras de José Rojo, has the objective of contributing to the scientific and research community the edition of a literary dialogue written in Madrid at the end of the 17th century (c. 1670). The text explains how women should be educated. Such instruction is organised according to a traditional structure that is divided into three stages of female life: maiden (youth), married (maturity) and widow (senescence).The text has remained hitherto unpublished. According to the information preserved, it was transmitted in manuscript (mss. 8802; Biblioteca Nacional de España). There is also a second manuscript testimony, although this one has a different title and no mention of its author, José Rojo (mss. 17939, BNE). The conclusions reached allow us to affirm that this could be a later text. As explained in detail in the philological study, the second manuscript could generate certain problems of attribution; however, the evidence supporting Rojo's authorship is sufficient to reaffirm the proposal. The dating of the dialogue is a more complex question. The two manuscripts do not contain any information of this kind. Cautiously, we consider the possibility that the text belongs to the last decades of the 17th century. In order to put forward this hypothesis, we have compiled different information on the author's literary production, his biography and other features that we will analyse minutely in the studies that precede this edition...
Description
Tesis inédita de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Filología, leída el 27-04-2023