Aviso: para depositar documentos, por favor, inicia sesión e identifícate con tu cuenta de correo institucional de la UCM con el botón MI CUENTA UCM. No emplees la opción AUTENTICACIÓN CON CONTRASEÑA
 

Volunteer Engagement: Does Engagement Predict the Degree of Satisfaction among New Volunteers and the Commitment of Those who have been Active Longer?

dc.contributor.authorVecina Jiménez, María Luisa
dc.contributor.authorChacón Fuertes, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorBarrón López de Roda, Ana
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-20T03:52:26Z
dc.date.available2023-06-20T03:52:26Z
dc.date.issued2012-01-14
dc.description.abstractThis study examines the concept of engagement in samples of volunteers from different non-profit organisations. Study 1 analyzes the psychometric properties of the abbreviated version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) (Schaufeli, Bakker, & Salanova, 2006a). Two factorial structures are examined: one-dimensional and three-dimensional structures. Based on the Three-Stage Model of Volunteers’ Duration of Service (Chacón, Vecina, & Dávila, 2007), Study 2 investigates the relationship between engagement, volunteer satisfaction, and intention to remain in a sample of new volunteers and the relationship between engagement, organisational commitment, and intention to remain in a sample of veteran volunteers. Moderated mediation analysis is provided using duration of service as a moderator in order to set a splitting point between new and veteran volunteers. The results of the confirmatory factor analysis suggest that the three-factor model fits better to the data. Regarding the structural models, the first one shows that engagement is crucial to volunteer satisfaction during the first stage, while volunteer satisfaction is the key variable in explaining intention to continue. The second structural model shows that engagement reinforces the participant’s commitment to the organisation, while organizational commitment predicts intention to continue. Both models demonstrate a notable decline when samples are changed.
dc.description.departmentDepto. de Psicología Social, del Trabajo y Diferencial
dc.description.facultyFac. de Psicología
dc.description.refereedTRUE
dc.description.statuspub
dc.eprint.idhttps://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/30407
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1464-0597.2011.00460.x
dc.identifier.issn0269-994x
dc.identifier.officialurlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2011.00460.x
dc.identifier.relatedurlhttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1464-0597
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/44595
dc.issue.number1
dc.journal.titleApplied Psychology
dc.language.isoeng
dc.page.final148
dc.page.initial130
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing
dc.relation.projectIDPrograma de Creación y Consolidación de Gruposde Investigación UCM-BSCH
dc.rights.accessRightsrestricted access
dc.subject.cdu316.6
dc.subject.cdu159.9.072
dc.subject.keywordPsicologia social
dc.subject.keywordPsicometría
dc.subject.ucmPsicología social (Psicología)
dc.subject.ucmPsicometría
dc.subject.ucmPsicología comunitaria
dc.subject.unesco6114 Psicología Social
dc.subject.unesco6105.05 Psicometría
dc.subject.unesco6114.04 Psicología Comunitaria
dc.titleVolunteer Engagement: Does Engagement Predict the Degree of Satisfaction among New Volunteers and the Commitment of Those who have been Active Longer?
dc.typejournal article
dc.volume.number61
dcterms.referencesAjzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Bakker, A.B., & Leiter, M.P. (2010). Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research. New York: Psychology Press. Bakker, A.B., Schaufeli, W.B., Leiter, M.P., & Taris, T.W. (2008). Work engagement: An emerging concept in occupational health psychology. Work & Stress, 22, 187–200. Brickman, P. (1987). Commitment, conflict, and caring. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Britt, T.W., Dickinson, J.M., Greene, T.M., & McKibben, E. (2007). Self-engagement at work. In C.L. Cooper & D. Nelson (Eds.), Positive organizational behavior: Accentuating the positive at work (pp. 143–158). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Callero, P.L. (1985). Role-identity salience. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 203–215. 16 VECINA ET AL. © 2011 The Authors. Applied Psychology: An International Review © 2011 International Association of Applied Psychology. Callero, P.L., Howard, J.A., & Piliavin, J.A. (1987). Helping behavior as role behavior: Disclosing social structure and history in the analysis of prosocial action. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50, 247–256. Chacón, F., Vecina, M.L., & Dávila, M.C. (2007). The three-stage model of volunteers’duration of service. Social Behavior and Personality, 35, 627–642. Clary, E., Snyder, M., Ridge, R.D., Copeland, J., Stukas, A.A., Haugen, J., & Miene, P. (1998). Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: A functional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1516–1530. Dávila, M.C., & Chacón, F. (2003). Adaptación de instrumentos para la evaluación de aspectos organizacionales en ONG’s. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 19, 159–179. Durán, M.A., Extremera, N., Montalbán, F.M., & Rey, L. (2005). Engagement y Burnout en el ámbito docente: Análisis de sus relaciones con la satisfacción laboral y vital en una muestra de profesores. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 2, 145–158. González-Romá, V., Schaufeli, W.B., Bakker, A.B., & Lloret, S. (2006). Burnout and work engagement: Independent factors or opposite poles? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 165–174. Greenslade, J.H., & White, K.M. (2005). The prediction of above-average participation in volunteerism: A test of the Theory of Planned Behavior and the Volunteers Functions Inventory in older Australian adults. Journal of Social Psychology, 145, 155–172. Grube, J.A., & Piliavin, J.A. (2000). Role identity, organizational experiences and volunteer performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1108–1119. Hallberg, U.E., & Schaufeli, W.B. (2006). “Same same” but different? Can work engagement be discriminated from job involvement and organizational commitment? European Psychologist, 11, 119–127. Hu, L., & Bentler, M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. Jamison, I.B. (2003). Turnover and retention among volunteers in human service agencies. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 23, 114–132. Macey, W.H., & Schneider, B. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 3–30. Maslach, C., & Leiter, M.P. (2008). Early predictors of job burnout and engagement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 498–512. Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W.B., & Leiter, M.P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 397–422. Meyer, J.P., & Allen, N.J. (1984). Testing the “side-bet theory” of organizational commitment: Some methodological considerations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 327–379. Meyer, J.P., & Allen, N.J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and application. London: Sage. Mowday, R.T., Porter, L.W., & Steers, R.M. (1982). Employee–organization linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. New York: Academic Press. VOLUNTEER ENGAGEMENT 17 © 2011 The Authors. Applied Psychology: An International Review © 2011 International Association of Applied Psychology. Mowday, R.T., Steers, R.M., & Porter, L.W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 224–247. Muthén, B.O. (2007). Mplus: Statistical analysis with latent variables. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. Muthén, L.K., & Muthén, B.O. (2007). Mplus user’s guide (5th edn.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. Omoto, A.M., & Snyder, M. (1995). Sustained helping without obligation: Motivation, longevity of service, and perceived attitude change among AIDS volunteers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 671–686. Penner, L.A. (2002). Dispositional and organizational influences on sustained volunteerism: An interactionist perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 447–467. Penner, L.A., & Finkelstein, M.A. (1998). Dispositional and structural determinants of volunteerism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 525–537. Porter, L.W., Steers, R.M., Mowday, R.T., & Boulian, P.V. (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 603–609. Preacher, K.J., Rucker, D.D., & Hayes, A.F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185–227. Salanova, M., & Llorens, S. (2008). Estado actual y retos futuros en el estudio del burnout. Papeles del Psicólogo, 29, 59–67. Salanova, M., Martínez, I., Bresó, E., Llorens, S., & Grau, R. (2005). Bienestar psicológico en estudiantes universitarios: facilitadores y obstaculizadores del desempeño académico. Anales de Psicología, 21, 170–180. Salanova, M., & Schaufeli, W. (2004). La ilusión por el trabajo (engagement): ¿el polo opuesto al burnout? In J. Martinez (Ed.), Quemarse en el trabajo (burnout): 11 perspectivas del burnout. Madrid: Elgido. Salanova, M., & Schaufeli, W.B. (2008). A cross-national study of work engagement as a mediator between job resources and proactive behavior: A cross-national study. International Journal of Human Resources Management, 19, 226–231. Salanova, M., & Schaufeli, W. (2009). El engagement en el trabajo. Cuando el trabajo se convierte en pasión. Madrid: Alianza Editorial. Salanova, M., Schaufeli, W.B., Llorens, S., Peiró, J.M., & Grau, R.M. (2000). Desde el burnout al engagement: ¿una nueva perspectiva? Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 16, 117–134. Satorra, A., & Bentler, P.M. (2010). Ensuring positiveness of the scaled difference chi-square test statistic. Psychometrika, 75, 243–248. Schaufeli, W., Bakker, A.B., & Salanova, M. (2006a). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 701–716. Schaufeli, W.B., & Salanova, M. (2007). Work engagement: An emerging psychological concept and its implication for organizations. In S.W. Gilliland, D.D. Steiner, & D.P. Skarlicki (Eds.), Research in social issues in management: Managing social and ethical issues in organizations (pp. 135–177). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishers. 18 VECINA ET AL. © 2011 The Authors. Applied Psychology: An International Review © 2011 International Association of Applied Psychology. Schaufeli, W.B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A.B. (2002). The measurement of burnout and engagement: A confirmative analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71–92. Schaufeli, W.B., Taris, T.W., & Bakker, A. (2006b). Dr Jekyll and Mr Hide: On the differences between work engagement and workaholism. In R.J. Burke (Ed.), Research companion to working time and work addiction (pp. 139–252). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar. Schreiber, J.B., Nora, A., Stage, F.K., Barlow, E.A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. Journal of Educational Research, 99, 323–338. Seppälä, P., Mauno, S., Feldt, T., Hakanen, J., Kinnunen, U., Tolvanen, A., & Schaufeli, W. (2009). The construct validity of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale: Multisample and longitudinal evidence. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10, 459–481. Shirom, A. (2003). Feeling vigorous at work? The construct of vigor and the study of positive affects in organizations. In D. Ganster & P.L. Perrewe (Eds.), Research in organizational stress and well-being (pp. 135–165). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Sonnentag, S. (2003). Recovery, work engagement, and proactive behavior: A new look at the interface between nonwork and work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 518–528. Sonnentag, S., Dormann, C., & Demerouti, E. (2010). Not all days are created equal: The concept of state work engagement. In A.B. Bakker & M.P. Leiter (Eds.), Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research (pp. 25–38). New York: Psychology Press. Vecina, M.L., Chacón, F., & Sueiro, M.J. (2009). Satisfacción en el voluntariado: estructura interna y relación con la permanencia en las organizaciones. Psicothema, 21, 112–117. Vecina, M.L., Chacón, F., & Sueiro, M.J. (2010). Differences and similarities among volunteers who drop out during the first year and volunteers who continue after eight years. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 13, 335–344. Wefald, A.J., & Downey, R.G. (2009). Construct dimensionality of engagement and its relation with satisfaction. Journal of Psychology, 143, 91–11. Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A.B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W.B. (2009). Work engagement and financial returns: A diary study on the role of job and personal resources. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82, 183–200.
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication2efdd18b-ea10-4378-971a-bef1ec5cc4a0
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationb4b87f9c-c550-40b5-b9c1-a4bd37e02091
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery2efdd18b-ea10-4378-971a-bef1ec5cc4a0

Download

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Applied Psychology publicado (4).pdf
Size:
204.62 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections